• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大学环境中助产士教育里学生助产士对高保真模拟的体验:一项定性系统综述

Student midwives' experiences of high-fidelity simulation in midwifery education in the university setting: A qualitative systematic review.

作者信息

Jolly Louise, Ooms Ann, Ransome Hazel

机构信息

Kingston University London, UK.

Kingston University London, UK.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2025 Sep;152:106779. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106779. Epub 2025 May 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106779
PMID:40382860
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High- Fidelity Simulation is an increasingly popular, evidence-based, and technologically sophisticated pedagogical approach within nursing and midwifery education and simulated practice learning. Various systematic reviews exploring the effectiveness of High- Fidelity Simulation have been undertaken, yet there is limited evidence and no current systematic review about student midwives' experiences of High- Fidelity Simulation. Due to this lack of evidence, the proposed review into student midwives' experiences of High- Fidelity Simulation is highly justified. This review aims to provide new insights into this pedagogical approach within midwifery education and shape recommendations to assist midwifery educators to deliver high-quality High-Fidelity Simulation.

AIM

To explore what is known about the experiences of student midwives who have engaged in High- Fidelity Simulation as part of their midwifery education within the university setting.

DESIGN AND METHODS

The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for qualitative systematic reviews was followed and the study is reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS/FINDINGS: The review found High- Fidelity Simulation to be a beneficial learning process, however some negative experiences were also identified. Two main themes emerged related to barriers and facilitators. Facilitators included the following seven subthemes: practical skill development, authenticity of the manikin and surroundings, application of theory to practice, increased confidence, practicing in a safe learning environment, improved team working skills, and the value of feedback. Barriers included the following 5 subthemes: a lack of realism, stress and pressure whilst role playing, anxiety, feelings of guilt, shame and decreased self-esteem, and group allocation.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the synthesized findings highlight that student midwives perceive the use of High- Fidelity Simulation to be highly beneficial, positively impacting their clinical competence and team working skills. Moreover, if High- Fidelity Simulation was used consistently and alongside adequate preparation and debriefing processes any unnecessary emotional harm could be avoided. Therefore, the application of High-Fidelity Simulation has the potential to develop a midwifery workforce that is better equipped to practice safely and more effectively at the point of registration, which could reduce mortality and morbidity rates for women and babies.

摘要

背景

高保真模拟是护理和助产教育及模拟实践学习中一种越来越受欢迎、基于证据且技术复杂的教学方法。已经进行了各种探讨高保真模拟有效性的系统评价,但关于助产专业学生高保真模拟体验的证据有限,且目前尚无系统评价。由于缺乏此类证据,对助产专业学生高保真模拟体验进行拟议的评价具有充分的合理性。本评价旨在为助产教育中的这种教学方法提供新的见解,并形成相关建议,以协助助产教育工作者开展高质量的高保真模拟。

目的

探讨在大学环境中,作为助产教育一部分参与过高保真模拟的助产专业学生的体验。

设计与方法

遵循乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)定性系统评价方法,并按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南报告本研究。

结果/发现:评价发现高保真模拟是一个有益的学习过程,但也发现了一些负面体验。出现了与障碍和促进因素相关的两个主要主题。促进因素包括以下七个子主题:实践技能发展、人体模型及环境的真实性、理论应用于实践、信心增强、在安全的学习环境中练习、团队协作技能提高以及反馈的价值。障碍包括以下五个子主题:缺乏真实感、角色扮演时的压力和紧张、焦虑、内疚感、羞耻感和自尊降低以及分组。

结论

总体而言,综合研究结果表明,助产专业学生认为使用高保真模拟非常有益,对他们的临床能力和团队协作技能有积极影响。此外,如果持续使用高保真模拟,并辅以充分的准备和汇报过程,任何不必要的情感伤害都可以避免。因此,高保真模拟的应用有可能培养出一支在注册时就能更好地安全、有效执业的助产队伍,这可以降低妇女和婴儿的死亡率和发病率。

相似文献

1
Student midwives' experiences of high-fidelity simulation in midwifery education in the university setting: A qualitative systematic review.大学环境中助产士教育里学生助产士对高保真模拟的体验:一项定性系统综述
Nurse Educ Today. 2025 Sep;152:106779. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106779. Epub 2025 May 13.
2
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.基于母婴模拟的学习中学生和教育工作者的体验:定性证据的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Nov;15(11):2666-2706. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003147.
3
Effect of an Extended Reality Simulation Intervention on Midwifery Students' Anxiety: Systematic Review.扩展现实模拟干预对助产专业学生焦虑情绪的影响:系统评价
JMIR Nurs. 2025 Jun 18;8:e68984. doi: 10.2196/68984.
4
A systematic mixed-methods review of interventions, outcomes and experiences for midwives and student midwives in work-related psychological distress.对助产士和助产专业学生工作相关心理困扰的干预措施、结果及体验的系统混合方法综述
Midwifery. 2017 Jul;50:163-173. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
5
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
Factors that enhance midwifery students' learning and development of self-efficacy in clinical placement: A systematic qualitative review.促进助产专业学生在临床实习中学习及自我效能感发展的因素:一项系统性质性综述
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Jan;66:103510. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103510. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
9
Feasibility study of Learning Together for Mental Health: fidelity, reach and acceptability of a whole-school intervention aiming to promote health and wellbeing in secondary schools.“共同学习促进心理健康”可行性研究:一项旨在促进中学健康与幸福的全校性干预措施的保真度、覆盖面和可接受性。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jun 18:1-36. doi: 10.3310/RTRT0202.
10
Team based learning in nursing and midwifery higher education; a systematic review of the evidence for change.护理与助产高等教育中的团队式学习;对变革证据的系统评价
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Jan;60:75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.09.012. Epub 2017 Sep 28.