Kocabay Aysun Parlak, Esdogan Aysegul, Yagcioglu Aysenur Aykul
Department of Audiology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Audiology, KTO Karatay University, Konya, Turkey.
Brain Behav. 2025 May;15(5):e70574. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70574.
The aim was to investigate the impact of visual tasks on acoustic reflex thresholds (ARTs) and AR latencies (ARLs) during AR measurements.
A total of 31 participants (17 female, 14 male; mean age: 20.3 ± 1.8 years) with normal hearing and Type A tympanograms were included. ARTs and latencies were measured using a 226 Hz probe tone under five distinct conditions: (1) resting with no visual task, (2) eyes comfortably closed, (3) fixed gaze on a stationary object, (4) saccadic eye movements, and (5) optokinetic eye movements. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction applied for post hoc comparisons.
ARTs were significantly lower in the condition of eyes closed compared to fixed gaze, at both 1 and 2 kHz (p < 0.05). ARLs at 500 Hz were significantly shorter in the condition of fixed gaze compared to saccadic eye movements (p < 0.05). A significant interaction between frequency and condition was observed for ARTs, indicating frequency-specific modulation by visual tasks, whereas no significant frequency and condition interaction was found for ARLs.
Visual tasks have a measurable effect on ARTs and latencies, likely due to cross-modal interactions between the auditory and visual systems. These results highlight the importance of standardizing visual and attentional conditions during clinical AR testing. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying neural mechanisms and their clinical implications.
本研究旨在探讨在听反射(AR)测量过程中视觉任务对听反射阈值(ARTs)和听反射潜伏期(ARLs)的影响。
共纳入31名听力正常且鼓室图为A型的参与者(17名女性,14名男性;平均年龄:20.3±1.8岁)。在五种不同条件下使用226Hz探测音测量ARTs和潜伏期:(1)无视觉任务时休息;(2)舒适地闭上眼睛;(3)凝视静止物体;(4)眼球扫视运动;(5)视动性眼球运动。采用重复测量方差分析对数据进行分析,并应用Bonferroni校正进行事后比较。
在1kHz和2kHz时,闭眼条件下的ARTs显著低于凝视静止物体时(p<0.05)。在500Hz时,凝视静止物体条件下的ARLs显著短于眼球扫视运动时(p<0.05)。观察到ARTs在频率和条件之间存在显著交互作用,表明视觉任务对ARTs有频率特异性调制,而ARLs未发现显著的频率和条件交互作用。
视觉任务对ARTs和潜伏期有可测量的影响,可能是由于听觉和视觉系统之间的跨模态相互作用。这些结果突出了在临床AR测试中标准化视觉和注意力条件的重要性。有必要进一步研究以阐明潜在的神经机制及其临床意义。