Szollosi Irene, Worley Sophia, Senanayake Sameera, Kularatna Sanjeewa, Curtin Deanne
Sleep Disorders Centre, The Prince Charles Hospital, Queensland, Australia.
School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Aust J Rural Health. 2025 Jun;33(3):e70057. doi: 10.1111/ajr.70057.
To evaluate a Hub-and-Spoke design for providing sleep disorder services in a very remote community. The health service re-design aimed to provide unattended polysomnography at the Spoke site with access to attended laboratory studies at the Hub when clinically indicated.
Summative evaluation using the RE-AIM Framework including all adult patients referred for diagnosis and management of a suspected sleep disorder from Remote Health Service to Metropolitan Health Service 2 years pre-implementation and 1 year post-implementation.
Controlled before-and-after implementation outcome study.
Public hospital in metropolitan South-East Queensland with a comprehensive accredited sleep disorder service (Hub), networked to a Community Health Centre (Spoke), located in a very remote region defined by the Modified Monash Model in central Queensland.
Referral numbers (Reach), travel avoidance and consumer satisfaction (Effectiveness), number of referrers (Adoption), unattended sleep study data quality, timeliness to testing, health service costs (Implementation), and referral numbers beyond initial 12-month pilot (Maintenance).
The Hub-and-Spoke model increased adoption five-fold by local referrers and resulted in a nine-fold increase in reach. Effectiveness was demonstrated through high levels of consumer satisfaction, and all implementation aims were met, including providing services at a lower cost. Sustainability was demonstrated through ongoing referrals and the transition of the model of care to business as usual.
Hub-and-Spoke designs for public sleep disorder services are effective at both the individual and organisational levels. Services can be delivered at a lower cost and, importantly, improve access to specialist services in remote and very remote communities.
评估一种用于在非常偏远社区提供睡眠障碍服务的中心-辐条式设计。这项医疗服务重新设计旨在在辐条站点提供无人值守的多导睡眠监测,并在临床需要时能够在中心获得有人值守的实验室研究服务。
使用RE-AIM框架进行总结性评估,纳入在实施前2年和实施后1年从偏远医疗服务机构转介至大都市医疗服务机构进行疑似睡眠障碍诊断和管理的所有成年患者。
实施前后对照的结局研究。
昆士兰州东南部大都市的一家公立医院,拥有全面认可的睡眠障碍服务(中心),与位于昆士兰州中部由改良莫纳什模型定义的非常偏远地区的社区健康中心(辐条)联网。
转诊数量(覆盖范围)、避免出行情况和消费者满意度(有效性)、转诊医生数量(采用情况)、无人值守睡眠研究数据质量、检测及时性、医疗服务成本(实施情况)以及初始12个月试点期之后的转诊数量(维持情况)。
中心-辐条式模式使当地转诊医生的采用率提高了五倍,覆盖范围增加了九倍。通过高水平的消费者满意度证明了有效性,并且实现了所有实施目标,包括以更低成本提供服务。通过持续的转诊以及护理模式向常规业务的转变证明了可持续性。
用于公共睡眠障碍服务的中心-辐条式设计在个人和组织层面均有效。可以以更低成本提供服务,重要的是,改善偏远和非常偏远社区获得专科服务的机会。