• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于脓毒症管理的多智能体方法。

Multi-Agent Approach for Sepsis Management.

作者信息

Iapascurta Victor, Fiodorov Ion, Belii Adrian, Bostan Viorel

机构信息

Department of Software Engineering and Automatics, Technical University of Moldova, Chisinnu, Republic of Moldova.

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinnu, Republic of Moldova.

出版信息

Healthc Inform Res. 2025 Apr;31(2):209-214. doi: 10.4258/hir.2025.31.2.209. Epub 2025 Apr 30.

DOI:10.4258/hir.2025.31.2.209
PMID:40384072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12086443/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The high incidence of sepsis necessitates the development of practical decision-making tools for intensivists, especially during the early, critical phases of management. This study evaluates a multi-agent system intended to assist clinicians with antibiotic therapy and adherence to current sepsis management guidelines before diagnostic results become available.

METHODS

A multi-agent system incorporating three specialized agents was developed: a sepsis management agent, an antibiotic recommendation agent, and a sepsis guidelines compliance agent. A sepsis case from the MIMIC IV database, organized as a clinical vignette, was used to integrate and test these agents for generating management recommendations. The system leverages retrieval-augmented generation to improve decision-making through the integration of current literature and guidelines.

RESULTS

The application produced management recommendations for a sepsis case associated with pneumonia, including early initiation of broad-spectrum antibiotics and close monitoring for clinical deterioration. Two expert intensivists evaluated these recommendations as "acceptable" and reported moderate interrater agreement (Cohen's kappa = 0.622, p = 0.003) across various aspects of recommendation usefulness.

CONCLUSIONS

The multi-agent system shows promise in enhancing decision-making for sepsis management by optimizing antibiotic therapy and ensuring guideline compliance. However, reliance on a single case study limits the generalizability of the findings, highlighting the need for broader validation in diverse clinical settings to improve patient outcomes.

摘要

目的

脓毒症的高发病率使得有必要为重症监护医生开发实用的决策工具,尤其是在管理的早期关键阶段。本研究评估了一个多智能体系统,旨在在诊断结果出来之前协助临床医生进行抗生素治疗并遵守当前的脓毒症管理指南。

方法

开发了一个包含三个专门智能体的多智能体系统:一个脓毒症管理智能体、一个抗生素推荐智能体和一个脓毒症指南合规智能体。使用来自MIMIC IV数据库的一个脓毒症病例,整理成临床案例,来整合和测试这些智能体以生成管理建议。该系统利用检索增强生成技术,通过整合当前文献和指南来改善决策。

结果

该应用程序为一个与肺炎相关的脓毒症病例生成了管理建议,包括早期使用广谱抗生素以及密切监测临床恶化情况。两名专家重症监护医生将这些建议评为“可接受”,并报告在建议有用性的各个方面,评分者间的一致性为中等(科恩kappa系数 = 0.622,p = 0.003)。

结论

该多智能体系统在通过优化抗生素治疗和确保指南合规性来增强脓毒症管理决策方面显示出前景。然而,依赖单一案例研究限制了研究结果的普遍性,这突出表明需要在不同临床环境中进行更广泛的验证以改善患者预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/671c/12086443/dadf229e499a/hir-2025-31-2-209f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/671c/12086443/24401ce09f0e/hir-2025-31-2-209f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/671c/12086443/22415b2ba886/hir-2025-31-2-209f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/671c/12086443/67051309fcbc/hir-2025-31-2-209f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/671c/12086443/dadf229e499a/hir-2025-31-2-209f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/671c/12086443/24401ce09f0e/hir-2025-31-2-209f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/671c/12086443/22415b2ba886/hir-2025-31-2-209f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/671c/12086443/67051309fcbc/hir-2025-31-2-209f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/671c/12086443/dadf229e499a/hir-2025-31-2-209f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Multi-Agent Approach for Sepsis Management.用于脓毒症管理的多智能体方法。
Healthc Inform Res. 2025 Apr;31(2):209-214. doi: 10.4258/hir.2025.31.2.209. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
2
Vesicoureteral Reflux膀胱输尿管反流
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.2019年脓毒症护理路径
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019.
5
Utilizing large language models for gastroenterology research: a conceptual framework.利用大语言模型进行胃肠病学研究:一个概念框架。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 1;18:17562848251328577. doi: 10.1177/17562848251328577. eCollection 2025.
6
Management of neonates at risk of early onset sepsis: a probability-based approach and recent literature appraisal : Update of the Swiss national guideline of the Swiss Society of Neonatology and the Pediatric Infectious Disease Group Switzerland.管理有早发性败血症风险的新生儿:基于概率的方法和最新文献评估:瑞士新生儿学会和瑞士儿科传染病学会国家指南的更新。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Dec;183(12):5517-5529. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05811-0. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
7
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008.拯救脓毒症运动:严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克治疗国际指南:2008年版
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):296-327. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000298158.12101.41.
8
An AI-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Antibiotic Therapy in Sepsis (KINBIOTICS): Use Case Analysis.基于人工智能的脓毒症抗生素治疗临床决策支持系统(KINBIOTICS):用例分析
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Mar 4;12:e66699. doi: 10.2196/66699.
9
Assuring the safety of AI-based clinical decision support systems: a case study of the AI Clinician for sepsis treatment.确保基于人工智能的临床决策支持系统的安全性:以 AI Clinician 治疗脓毒症为例
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2022 Jul;29(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100549.
10
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012.拯救脓毒症运动:严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2012 年。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):580-637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af.

本文引用的文献

1
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
2
Mortality after Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock in Swedish Intensive Care Units 2008-2016-A nationwide observational study.2008-2016 年瑞典重症监护病房严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的死亡率:一项全国性观察研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 Aug;64(7):967-975. doi: 10.1111/aas.13587. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
3
Empiric Antibiotics for Sepsis.
脓毒症的经验性抗生素治疗
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 Feb/Mar;19(2):147-154. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.282. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
4
The Timing of Early Antibiotics and Hospital Mortality in Sepsis.脓毒症中早期使用抗生素的时机与医院死亡率
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct 1;196(7):856-863. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201609-1848OC.
5
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
6
Assessment of Global Incidence and Mortality of Hospital-treated Sepsis. Current Estimates and Limitations.评估全球医院治疗脓毒症的发病率和死亡率。当前的估计和局限性。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb 1;193(3):259-72. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201504-0781OC.
7
Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock.在开始有效的抗菌治疗之前低血压的持续时间是人类感染性休克生存的关键决定因素。
Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun;34(6):1589-96. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000217961.75225.E9.