• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同新型超声技术在神经外科手术切除评估中的比较

Comparison of different new ultrasonic technologies in resection assessment of neurosurgery.

作者信息

Wang Lu, Liu Jinsong, Jiang Yong, Liang Ying, Fang Mengru, Ma Weichao, Li Jiami, Li Xiangyu, Ren Tianjian, Lu Man

机构信息

Ultrasound Medical Center, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

Department of Cerebral Surgery, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 May 1;15(5):4146-4155. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-2271. Epub 2025 Apr 22.

DOI:10.21037/qims-24-2271
PMID:40384694
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12084732/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

New ultrasound (US) techniques, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and shear wave elastography (SWE), are being used to identify artifacts, guide the interventions and evaluate the extent of resection, as it is difficult for gray-scale ultrasound to distinguish the artifacts in intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS). However, to date, no comparative study has been conducted on the role of several new US technologies in guiding brain tumor resection. Thus, this study sought to compare the roles of various new US technologies in guiding brain tumor resection to find a convenient and useful guiding technology for brain tumor resection.

METHODS

From July 2022 to July 2023, 64 brain tumor patients (33 men and 31 women), with ages ranging from 26 to 78 years (53.2±11.6 years), were included in the study. Before surgery, a planned resection (pRS) was determined for all of the included patients by a multidisciplinary neuro-oncology team. All patients underwent microsurgical resection of the lesion. After the craniotomy and before the dural opening, ultrasonic techniques, including B-mode, micro-flow imaging (MFI), CEUS, and SWE, were used to evaluate the features of the brain tumor and its surrounding structure. Then, those ultrasonic techniques were applied to each patient to confirm the microsurgical margin achieving the pRS at the end of the resection. Next, 3 days after surgery, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan was performed on each patient as the reference standard. The agreement between B-mode, color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI), MFI, CEUS, SWE, and MRI was measured by Fleiss' kappa agreement.

RESULTS

In the evaluation of the surgical resection edges, all the included US technologies showed substantial agreement compared to the MRI results. The Kappa values were 0.717, 0.751, 0.714, and 0.892 for B-mode, MFI, SWE, and CEUS, respectively. CEUS and MRI showed the best diagnostic consistency. CEUS had the highest sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (77.78%, 100%, 100%, and 86.05%, respectively), followed by MFI. B-mode and SWE showed similar accuracy in detecting tumor residue.

CONCLUSIONS

US is a convenient and cost-effective method for guiding the procedure and evaluating the extent of resection in neurosurgery. CEUS has the highest diagnostic accuracy for residual lesions among the new US technologies. Thus, MFI can be recommended as a technique for guiding and evaluating residues in neurosurgery in addition to CEUS.

摘要

背景

新的超声(US)技术,如超声造影(CEUS)和剪切波弹性成像(SWE),正被用于识别伪像、指导干预措施以及评估切除范围,因为灰阶超声难以区分术中超声(IOUS)中的伪像。然而,迄今为止,尚未对几种新的超声技术在指导脑肿瘤切除中的作用进行比较研究。因此,本研究旨在比较各种新的超声技术在指导脑肿瘤切除中的作用,以找到一种方便且有用的脑肿瘤切除指导技术。

方法

2022年7月至2023年7月,64例脑肿瘤患者(33例男性和31例女性)纳入研究,年龄范围为26至78岁(53.2±11.6岁)。术前,多学科神经肿瘤团队为所有纳入患者确定计划切除范围(pRS)。所有患者均接受病变的显微手术切除。开颅后、硬脑膜打开前,使用包括B模式、微血流成像(MFI)、CEUS和SWE在内的超声技术评估脑肿瘤及其周围结构的特征。然后,将这些超声技术应用于每位患者,以确认在切除结束时达到pRS的显微手术切缘。接下来,术后3天,对每位患者进行磁共振成像(MRI)扫描作为参考标准。通过Fleiss卡帕一致性检验测量B模式、彩色多普勒血流成像(CDFI)、MFI、CEUS、SWE与MRI之间的一致性。

结果

在手术切除边缘的评估中,与MRI结果相比,所有纳入的超声技术均显示出高度一致性。B模式、MFI、SWE和CEUS的卡帕值分别为0.717、0.751、0.714和0.892。CEUS与MRI显示出最佳的诊断一致性。在接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析中,CEUS具有最高的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值(分别为77.78%、100%、100%和86.05%),其次是MFI。B模式和SWE在检测肿瘤残留方面显示出相似的准确性。

结论

超声是神经外科手术中指导手术过程和评估切除范围的一种方便且经济有效的方法。在新的超声技术中,CEUS对残留病变的诊断准确性最高。因此,除CEUS外,MFI可推荐作为神经外科手术中指导和评估残留病变的一种技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b594/12084732/1add69f10274/qims-15-05-4146-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b594/12084732/06a241b95c53/qims-15-05-4146-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b594/12084732/1add69f10274/qims-15-05-4146-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b594/12084732/06a241b95c53/qims-15-05-4146-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b594/12084732/1add69f10274/qims-15-05-4146-f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of different new ultrasonic technologies in resection assessment of neurosurgery.不同新型超声技术在神经外科手术切除评估中的比较
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 May 1;15(5):4146-4155. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-2271. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
2
Determining whether the diagnostic value of B-ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound and shear wave elastography in breast mass-like and non-mass-like lesions differs: a diagnostic test.确定B超联合超声造影及剪切波弹性成像在乳腺肿块样和非肿块样病变中的诊断价值是否存在差异:一项诊断试验。
Gland Surg. 2023 Feb 28;12(2):282-296. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-51. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
3
Comparative Diagnostic Performance of Color Doppler Flow Imaging, MicroFlow Imaging and Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Solid Renal Tumors.彩色多普勒血流成像、微流成像及超声造影在肾实性肿瘤中的诊断性能比较
Acad Radiol. 2025 Jun;32(6):3475-3484. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.12.057. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
4
A preliminary study on the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and micro-flow imaging for detecting blood flow signals in breast cancer patients.超声造影及微血流成像对乳腺癌患者血流信号检测的诊断价值初步研究
Gland Surg. 2024 Nov 30;13(11):2098-2106. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-264. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
5
Incremental Value of Shear Wave Elastography and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Differential Diagnosis of Breast Non-Mass-Like Lesions.剪切波弹性成像和超声造影在乳腺非肿块样病变鉴别诊断中的增量价值
Int J Womens Health. 2024 Dec 20;16:2221-2230. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S490565. eCollection 2024.
6
BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: could multi-mode ultrasound be helpful for their diagnosis?乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)4类乳腺病变:多模式超声对其诊断有帮助吗?
Gland Surg. 2019 Jun;8(3):258-270. doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.05.01.
7
Predictive value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and ultrasound elastography for management of BI-RADS category 4 nonpalpable breast masses.超声造影及超声弹性成像对 BI-RADS 分类 4 类触诊阴性乳腺肿块的预测价值。
Eur J Radiol. 2024 Apr;173:111391. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111391. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
8
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: Improving the preoperative staging of hepatocellular carcinoma and guiding individual treatment.超声造影:改善肝细胞癌术前分期并指导个体化治疗。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep 21;20(35):12628-36. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i35.12628.
9
Application of ultrasonic shear wave elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of patients with benign and malignant thyroid lesions.超声剪切波弹性成像与超声造影在甲状腺良恶性病变患者鉴别诊断中的应用
Gland Surg. 2020 Dec;9(6):2136-2143. doi: 10.21037/gs-20-819.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound synchronized with shear wave elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions: a diagnostic test.超声造影与剪切波弹性成像同步在乳腺良恶性病变鉴别诊断中的诊断准确性:一项诊断试验
Gland Surg. 2023 Jan 1;12(1):54-66. doi: 10.21037/gs-22-684. Epub 2023 Jan 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Non-navigated 2D intraoperative ultrasound: An unsophisticated surgical tool to achieve high standards of care in glioma surgery.非导航二维术中超声:神经胶质瘤手术中实现高标准治疗的一种简单手术工具。
J Neurooncol. 2024 May;167(3):387-396. doi: 10.1007/s11060-024-04614-5. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
2
Enhancing the Reliability of Intraoperative Ultrasound in Pediatric Space-Occupying Brain Lesions.提高术中超声在小儿脑占位性病变中的可靠性。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 3;13(5):971. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13050971.
3
Quantitative analysis of superb microvascular imaging for monitoring tumor response to chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.
用于监测局部晚期宫颈癌对放化疗反应的超微血管成像定量分析
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 4;12:1074173. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1074173. eCollection 2022.
4
The comparative burden of brain and central nervous system cancers from 1990 to 2019 between China and the United States and predicting the future burden.2019 年中国和美国脑和中枢神经系统癌症的发病负担比较及未来预测。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 21;10:1018836. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1018836. eCollection 2022.
5
Microvascular Flow Imaging: A State-of-the-Art Review of Clinical Use and Promise.微血管血流成像:临床应用与前景的最新综述。
Radiology. 2022 Nov;305(2):250-264. doi: 10.1148/radiol.213303. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
6
Burden of brain and other central nervous system cancer in China, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis of observational data from the global burden of disease study 2019.中国脑和其他中枢神经系统癌症负担,1990-2019 年:基于 2019 年全球疾病负担研究的观察性数据的系统分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 18;12(7):e059699. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059699.
7
Multiparametric Intraoperative Ultrasound in Oncological Neurosurgery: A Pictorial Essay.肿瘤神经外科手术中的多参数术中超声:图文综述
Front Neurosci. 2022 Apr 19;16:881661. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.881661. eCollection 2022.
8
Advantages and Limitations of Intraoperative Ultrasound Strain Elastography Applied in Brain Tumor Surgery: A Single-Center Experience.术中超声应变弹性成像在脑肿瘤手术中的优势和局限性:单中心经验。
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2022 May 1;22(5):305-314. doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000122.
9
[Application of Micro-flow Imaging in the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules].[微流成像技术在甲状腺良恶性结节鉴别中的应用]
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2022 Feb;44(1):40-44. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.13909.
10
Intraoperative Ultrasound: Emerging Technology and Novel Applications in Brain Tumor Surgery.术中超声:脑肿瘤手术中的新兴技术与新应用
Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 1;12:818446. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.818446. eCollection 2022.