Suppr超能文献

进行性家族性肝内胆汁淤积症(PFIC)中的免疫组织化学:弥合形态学与遗传学之间的差距

Immunohistochemistry in Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis (PFIC): Bridging Gap Between Morphology and Genetics.

作者信息

Nigam Neha, Bihari Chhagan, Sarma Moinak S, Srivastava Anshu, Krishnani Narendra, Mishra Prabhakar

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Department of Pathology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2025 Sep-Oct;15(5):102562. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2025.102562. Epub 2025 Mar 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: A heterogeneous group of disorders caused by bile secretion and transport defects is progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC). PFIC has various subtypes with different presentations, laboratory findings, treatments, progression, and prognosis. Genetic analysis is the gold standard for diagnosis but is costly, time-consuming, and not readily available. In this study, immunohistochemistry (IHC) was evaluated as a tool for identifying subtypes of PFIC and differentiating them from other causes of pediatric cholestasis.

METHODS

The study included genetically confirmed PFIC (n = 40) and non-PFIC group (n = 20). Clinical history and laboratory investigations were recorded from the hospital information system. PFIC subtypes 1,2,3,4,5, and 6 showed the genetic mutation in ATP8B1, ABCB11, ABCB4, tight junction protein 2 (TJP2), NR1H4, and MYO5B, respectively. IHC has been applied for bile salt export pump (BSEP), multidrug resistance protein 3 (MDR3), TJP2, Claudin 1, farnesoid X receptor (FXR), and MYO5B.

RESULTS

IHC staining for BSEP, MDR3, TJP2, and MYO5B was positive in 100% of PFIC 1 and negative in 90.9%, 84.6%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, of the PFIC subtypes 2, 3, 4, and 6. Significant differences were noted between PFIC and non-PFIC patients for BSEP ( = 0.044), MDR3 ( = 0.022), and TJP2 ( < 0.001). In comparison with the non-PFIC patients, BSEP's sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing PFIC 2 was 90.9% and 95%, MDR3's for diagnosing PFIC 3 was 84.6% and 95%, TJP2 for PFIC 4 was 100% and 95%, and MYO5B''s for PFIC 6.

CONCLUSION

Immunostaining for the markers BSEP, MDR3, TJP2, and MYO5B can differentiate various PFIC subtypes and distinguish between PFIC and non-PFIC patients.

摘要

背景/目的:由胆汁分泌和转运缺陷引起的一组异质性疾病为进行性家族性肝内胆汁淤积症(PFIC)。PFIC有多种亚型,其表现、实验室检查结果、治疗方法、病情进展及预后各不相同。基因分析是诊断的金标准,但成本高、耗时且不易获得。在本研究中,免疫组织化学(IHC)被评估为一种识别PFIC亚型并将其与小儿胆汁淤积症其他病因相鉴别的工具。

方法

该研究纳入了基因确诊的PFIC患者(n = 40)和非PFIC组(n = 20)。从医院信息系统记录临床病史和实验室检查结果。PFIC 1、2、3、4、5和6型分别在ATP8B1、ABCB11、ABCB4、紧密连接蛋白2(TJP2)、NR1H4和MYO5B中存在基因突变。IHC已应用于胆盐输出泵(BSEP)、多药耐药蛋白3(MDR3)、TJP2、闭合蛋白1、法尼酯X受体(FXR)和MYO5B。

结果

BSEP、MDR3、TJP2和MYO5B的IHC染色在100%的PFIC 1型中呈阳性,而在PFIC 2、3、4和6型中分别有90.9%、84.6%、100%和100%呈阴性。PFIC患者与非PFIC患者在BSEP(P = 0.044)、MDR3(P = 0.022)和TJP2(P < 0.001)方面存在显著差异。与非PFIC患者相比,BSEP诊断PFIC 2型的敏感性和特异性分别为90.9%和95%,MDR3诊断PFIC 3型的敏感性和特异性分别为84.6%和95%,TJP2诊断PFIC 4型的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和95%以及MYO5B诊断PFIC 6型的敏感性和特异性。

结论

对标志物BSEP、MDR3、TJP2和MYO5B进行免疫染色可区分不同的PFIC亚型,并鉴别PFIC患者与非PFIC患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验