McDonough Suzanne, Stephenson Aoife, Grimmett Chloe, Bennett Kathleen, Coyle Noreena, Grealis Stacey, Kinneavy Claire, Fitzgerald Oliver, French Helen, Stokes Maria, Walsh Aisling, Thacker Mick, Hurley Osing Deirdre, French David
School of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Leinster, Ireland.
University of Southampton, Southampton, England, UK.
HRB Open Res. 2025 Apr 28;7:75. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.14002.2. eCollection 2024.
Despite the wealth of evidence demonstrating the health benefits of physical activity (PA), people with arthritis commonly do not meet recommended PA levels. Whilst various programmes support people with arthritis to become active, most individuals reduce their level of PA after completion of a structured exercise programme. This research aims to co-develop and feasibility test a PA maintenance intervention for those living with arthritis, after exit from a structured exercise programme.
Intervention development was guided by the INDEX framework for developing complex interventions.Phase 1, Evidence Synthesis: Bring together existing evidence, clinical guidelines and behavior change theories for PA maintenance in arthritis, to develop an intervention logic model.Phase 2, Observation and qualitative study: Conduct an observational analysis of a physiotherapy led structured exercise programme for those living with arthritis, to understand what behaviour change components are used and what might support PA maintenance. Followed by a qualitative exploration of PA maintenance barriers, facilitators and strategies for those who have participated in the classes, their family members/friends and the delivering physiotherapist.Phase 3, Finalise intervention prototype: Results from phases 1 and 2, will be triangulated to inform potential intervention options. Those living with arthritis/key stakeholders will be invited to participatory workshops to refine intervention content and delivery modes.Phase 4, Feasibility Study: The final phase is a pre-post, mixed methods feasibility evaluation of the newly developed multicomponent PA maintenance intervention for people living with arthritis, after completion of a physiotherapy led structured exercise programme.
Intervention development will bring together PA maintenance theory and evidence with user input and other key contextual factors. User input will be achieved by collaboration with two embedded patient researchers and a wider Public Patient Involvement (PPI) panel to ensure diverse patient experiences and perspectives are heard and inform programme design.
尽管有大量证据表明体育活动(PA)对健康有益,但关节炎患者通常未达到推荐的体育活动水平。虽然有各种项目支持关节炎患者积极参与体育活动,但大多数人在完成结构化锻炼项目后会降低体育活动水平。本研究旨在为完成结构化锻炼项目后的关节炎患者共同开发并进行可行性测试一种体育活动维持干预措施。
干预措施的开发以用于开发复杂干预措施的INDEX框架为指导。第1阶段,证据综合:汇集有关关节炎患者体育活动维持的现有证据、临床指南和行为改变理论,以建立一个干预逻辑模型。第2阶段,观察与定性研究:对一项由物理治疗师主导的针对关节炎患者的结构化锻炼项目进行观察分析,以了解使用了哪些行为改变组成部分以及哪些因素可能有助于维持体育活动。随后,对参与课程的患者、他们的家庭成员/朋友以及提供治疗的物理治疗师进行定性探索,了解体育活动维持的障碍、促进因素和策略。第3阶段,确定干预原型:将第1阶段和第2阶段的结果进行三角验证,以确定潜在的干预选项。将邀请关节炎患者/关键利益相关者参加参与式研讨会,以完善干预内容和实施方式。第4阶段,可行性研究:最后阶段是在完成由物理治疗师主导的结构化锻炼项目后,对新开发的针对关节炎患者的多成分体育活动维持干预措施进行前后混合方法的可行性评估。
干预措施开发将把体育活动维持理论和证据与用户意见及其他关键背景因素结合起来。将通过与两名嵌入式患者研究人员和一个更广泛的公众患者参与(PPI)小组合作来获取用户意见,以确保听取不同患者的经历和观点,并为项目设计提供参考。