Wong Yee Ling, Tan Andrew, Lim Ee Woon, Chua Hua Ren, Shen Liang, Guillot Matthieu, Drobe Björn
Research and Development Centre, EssilorLuxottica, Singapore, Singapore.
Bio-Statistics Unit, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Ophthalmol Sci. 2025 Mar 14;5(4):100766. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2025.100766. eCollection 2025 Jul-Aug.
To examine the myopia control efficacy, in terms of axial elongation, of a new myopia control spectacle lenses with Dual-Index Aspherical Lenslets (DIAL) embedded within the lens, compared with single-vision spectacle lenses (SVLs) over a 1-year period.
A prospective, randomized, double-masked clinical trial.
Eighty children aged 8 to 13 years with myopia (spherical equivalent refraction [SER] between -0.75 and -4.75 diopters [D]) were recruited.
Participants were randomized to either the DIAL or SVL spectacle lenses group (1:1 ratio).
Axial length (AL), noncycloplegic subjective refraction, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were measured at baseline and 6-month intervals. Questionnaires on adaptation and compliance were administered during all visits.
A total of 76 (N = 38 in each group) participants (mean [standard deviation] age, 10.8 [1.6] years) completed the 1-year visit. Mean (± standard error) 1-year AL change in the DIAL and SVL groups was 0.04 ± 0.02 and 0.22 ± 0.04 mm, respectively. A mean difference of -0.18 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.26 to -0.10 mm; < 0.001) was found. Mean 1-year SER change in the DIAL and SVL groups was -0.13 ± 0.06 and -0.39 ± 0.08 D, respectively, with a mean difference of 0.26 D (95% CI, 0.06-0.46 D; = 0.01). Compared with SVL, younger children (8 to <11 years) and older children (11-13 years) in the DIAL group had significantly less axial elongation (-0.29 mm less for younger children and -0.09 mm less for older children), with greater myopia control effect of DIAL spectacle lenses among the younger group than among the older group ( = 0.004 for interaction). No significant differences between the lens groups were found for distance BCVA ( = 0.36). All participants adapted within 3 to 4 days regardless of lens group. No significant differences in mean daily wearing time were seen between the DIAL and SVL groups ( = 0.53).
Dual-Index Aspherical Lenslets spectacle lenses showed good myopia control efficacy, in terms of axial elongation, compared with SVL, among children aged 8 to 13 years in Singapore.
Proprietary or commercial disclosures may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
在1年的时间里,比较一种嵌入双指数非球面小透镜(DIAL)的新型近视控制眼镜镜片与单光眼镜镜片(SVL)在眼轴伸长方面的近视控制效果。
一项前瞻性、随机、双盲临床试验。
招募了80名8至13岁的近视儿童(等效球镜度[SER]在-0.75至-4.75屈光度[D]之间)。
参与者被随机分为DIAL或SVL眼镜镜片组(1:1比例)。
在基线和每隔6个月时测量眼轴长度(AL)、非睫状肌麻痹下的主观验光以及最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。在所有就诊时发放关于适应性和依从性的问卷。
共有76名参与者(每组38名)(平均[标准差]年龄,10.8[1.6]岁)完成了1年的随访。DIAL组和SVL组的平均(±标准误)1年眼轴变化分别为0.04±0.02和0.22±0.04毫米。发现平均差异为-0.18毫米(95%置信区间[CI],-0.26至-0.10毫米;P<0.001)。DIAL组和SVL组的平均1年等效球镜度变化分别为-0.13±0.06和-0.39±0.08 D,平均差异为0.26 D(95%CI,0.06 - 0.46 D;P = 0.01)。与SVL相比,DIAL组的年幼儿童(8至<11岁)和年长儿童(11 - 13岁)的眼轴伸长明显更少(年幼儿童少0.29毫米,年长儿童少0.09毫米),DIAL眼镜镜片在年幼儿童组中的近视控制效果比年长儿童组更好(交互作用P = 0.004)。两组镜片在远视力BCVA方面未发现显著差异(P = 0.36)。无论镜片组如何,所有参与者均在3至4天内适应。DIAL组和SVL组之间的平均每日佩戴时间无显著差异(P = 0.53)。
在新加坡8至13岁的儿童中,与SVL相比,双指数非球面小透镜眼镜镜片在眼轴伸长方面显示出良好的近视控制效果。
专有或商业披露信息可在本文末尾的脚注和披露内容中找到。