Nagayoshi Kinuko, Mizuuchi Yusuke, Nakamura Masafumi, Okabayashi Koji, Uchino Motoi, Ikeuchi Hiroki, Noguchi Tatsuki, Ishihara Soichiro, Ajioka Yoichi, Sugihara Kenichi
Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan.
Department of Surgery Keio University Tokyo Japan.
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024 Nov 12;9(3):486-495. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12885. eCollection 2025 May.
Our study aimed to examine the characteristics of elderly patients diagnosed with ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal cancer (UAC) and evaluate the impact of surgical intervention on prognosis.
A total of 1086 patients diagnosed with UAC between 1980 and 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. Data were collected through the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum project. The patients were divided into two groups: 248 elderly patients in the E-UAC group and 838 nonelderly patients in the NE-UAC group. Patients aged >65 y at cancer diagnosis were considered elderly.
The recurrence rate did not differ between the two groups. Segmental resection was the only common independent risk factor for recurrence in both the E-UAC and the NE-UAC groups. The E-UAC patients had significantly better 5-y disease-specific survival (DSS) than the NE-UAC patients (94.7% vs 91.0%, = 0.04). There were no differences in 5-y recurrence-free survival (RFS; 89.3% vs 86.6%, respectively, = 0.24) or overall survival (OS; 88.8% vs 89.6%, = 0.50). The E-UAC patients who underwent segmental resection had poorer RFS than those who underwent total proctocolectomy, but there were no significant differences in DSS or OS.
Despite the elevated risk of cancer recurrence observed in the UAC patients who underwent segmental resection in both the E-UAC the NE-UAC groups, our findings suggested that segmental resection may be a viable alternative to total proctocolectomy in terms of survival rate for the E-UAC patients.
本研究旨在探讨诊断为溃疡性结肠炎相关结直肠癌(UAC)的老年患者的特征,并评估手术干预对预后的影响。
回顾性纳入1980年至2020年间诊断为UAC的1086例患者。数据通过日本结直肠癌协会项目收集。患者分为两组:E-UAC组248例老年患者和NE-UAC组838例非老年患者。癌症诊断时年龄>65岁的患者被视为老年人。
两组的复发率无差异。节段性切除是E-UAC组和NE-UAC组复发的唯一共同独立危险因素。E-UAC患者的5年疾病特异性生存率(DSS)显著高于NE-UAC患者(94.7%对91.0%,P = 0.04)。5年无复发生存率(RFS;分别为89.3%对86.6%,P = 0.24)或总生存率(OS;88.8%对89.6%,P = 0.50)无差异。接受节段性切除的E-UAC患者的RFS低于接受全直肠结肠切除术的患者,但DSS或OS无显著差异。
尽管在E-UAC组和NE-UAC组中接受节段性切除的UAC患者癌症复发风险升高,但我们的研究结果表明,就E-UAC患者的生存率而言,节段性切除可能是全直肠结肠切除术的可行替代方案。