• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

驾驭人工智能伦理:在相互竞争的人工智能实践和技术中,使用人工神经网络和自适应神经模糊推理系统进行透明且可问责的项目评估。

Navigating AI ethics: ANN and ANFIS for transparent and accountable project evaluation amidst contesting AI practices and technologies.

作者信息

Wankhade Sandeep, Sahni Manoj, León-Castro Ernesto, Olazabal-Lugo Maricruz

机构信息

Department of Mathematics, Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, India.

Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Concepción, Chile.

出版信息

Front Artif Intell. 2025 Apr 30;8:1535845. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1535845. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/frai.2025.1535845
PMID:40385642
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12083503/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The rapid evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) necessitates robust ethical frameworks to ensure responsible project deployment. This study addresses the challenge of quantifying ethical criteria in AI projects amidst contesting communicative practices, organizational structures, and enabling technologies, which shape AI's societal implications.

METHODS

We propose a novel framework integrating Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS) to evaluate AI project performance and model ethical uncertainties using Fuzzy logic. A Fuzzy weighted average approach quantifies critical ethical dimensions: transparency, fairness, accountability, privacy, security, explainability, human involvement, and societal impact.

RESULTS

The framework enables a structured assessment of AI projects, enhancing transparency and accountability by mapping ethical criteria to project outcomes. ANN evaluates performance metrics, while ANFIS models uncertainties, providing a comprehensive ethical evaluation under complex conditions.

DISCUSSION

By combining ANN and ANFIS, this study advances the understanding of AI's ethical dimensions, offering a scalable approach for accountable AI systems. It reframes organizational communication and decision-making, embedding ethics within AI's technological and structural contexts. This work contributes to responsible AI innovation, fostering trust and societal alignment in AI deployments.

摘要

引言

人工智能(AI)的迅速发展需要强大的伦理框架,以确保项目的负责任部署。本研究应对了在相互竞争的交流实践、组织结构和支撑技术中量化人工智能项目伦理标准的挑战,这些因素塑造了人工智能的社会影响。

方法

我们提出了一个整合人工神经网络(ANN)和自适应神经模糊推理系统(ANFIS)的新颖框架,以使用模糊逻辑评估人工智能项目性能并对伦理不确定性进行建模。模糊加权平均方法量化了关键的伦理维度:透明度、公平性、问责制、隐私、安全性、可解释性、人类参与度和社会影响。

结果

该框架能够对人工智能项目进行结构化评估,通过将伦理标准映射到项目成果来提高透明度和问责制。人工神经网络评估性能指标,而自适应神经模糊推理系统对不确定性进行建模,在复杂条件下提供全面的伦理评估。

讨论

通过结合人工神经网络和自适应神经模糊推理系统,本研究推进了对人工智能伦理维度的理解,为可问责的人工智能系统提供了一种可扩展的方法。它重新构建了组织沟通和决策,将伦理嵌入人工智能的技术和结构背景中。这项工作有助于负责任的人工智能创新,在人工智能部署中促进信任和社会协调。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbb2/12083503/15c066c034e6/frai-08-1535845-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbb2/12083503/547e1ff9be46/frai-08-1535845-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbb2/12083503/cd9b165d6a62/frai-08-1535845-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbb2/12083503/7877fd13932c/frai-08-1535845-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbb2/12083503/15c066c034e6/frai-08-1535845-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbb2/12083503/547e1ff9be46/frai-08-1535845-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbb2/12083503/cd9b165d6a62/frai-08-1535845-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbb2/12083503/7877fd13932c/frai-08-1535845-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbb2/12083503/15c066c034e6/frai-08-1535845-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Navigating AI ethics: ANN and ANFIS for transparent and accountable project evaluation amidst contesting AI practices and technologies.驾驭人工智能伦理:在相互竞争的人工智能实践和技术中,使用人工神经网络和自适应神经模糊推理系统进行透明且可问责的项目评估。
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Apr 30;8:1535845. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1535845. eCollection 2025.
2
Data stewardship and curation practices in AI-based genomics and automated microscopy image analysis for high-throughput screening studies: promoting robust and ethical AI applications.基于人工智能的基因组学和用于高通量筛选研究的自动显微镜图像分析中的数据管理与整理实践:推动可靠且符合伦理的人工智能应用。
Hum Genomics. 2025 Feb 23;19(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40246-025-00716-x.
3
Navigating artificial general intelligence development: societal, technological, ethical, and brain-inspired pathways.驾驭通用人工智能发展:社会、技术、伦理及受大脑启发的路径。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 11;15(1):8443. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92190-7.
4
Navigating ethical considerations in the use of artificial intelligence for patient care: A systematic review.在将人工智能用于患者护理中应对伦理考量:一项系统综述。
Int Nurs Rev. 2024 Nov 15. doi: 10.1111/inr.13059.
5
Performance evaluation of artificial intelligence paradigms-artificial neural networks, fuzzy logic, and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for flood prediction.人工智能范式的性能评估——人工神经网络、模糊逻辑和自适应神经模糊推理系统在洪水预测中的应用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 May;28(20):25265-25282. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12410-1. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
6
Ethical implications of AI and robotics in healthcare: A review.人工智能和机器人技术在医疗保健中的伦理问题:综述。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 15;102(50):e36671. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036671.
7
Ethics dumping in artificial intelligence.人工智能中的道德倾销。
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Nov 8;7:1426761. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1426761. eCollection 2024.
8
Data Obfuscation Through Latent Space Projection for Privacy-Preserving AI Governance: Case Studies in Medical Diagnosis and Finance Fraud Detection.通过潜在空间投影进行数据混淆以实现隐私保护的人工智能治理:医学诊断和金融欺诈检测案例研究
JMIRx Med. 2025 Mar 12;6:e70100. doi: 10.2196/70100.
9
Enhancing education for children with ASD: a review of evaluation and measurement in AI tool implementation.加强自闭症谱系障碍儿童的教育:人工智能工具实施中的评估与测量综述
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Mar 13:1-18. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2025.2477678.
10
Towards secure and trusted AI in healthcare: A systematic review of emerging innovations and ethical challenges.迈向医疗保健领域安全可信的人工智能:对新兴创新和伦理挑战的系统综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Mar;195:105780. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105780. Epub 2024 Dec 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Is human oversight to AI systems still possible?对人工智能系统进行人为监督是否仍然可行?
N Biotechnol. 2025 Mar 25;85:59-62. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2024.12.003. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
2
Impact of artificial intelligence on human loss in decision making, laziness and safety in education.人工智能对教育中决策、懒惰和安全方面人类损失的影响。
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2023;10(1):311. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01787-8. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
3
AI4People-An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations.
《人工智能造福人类——良好人工智能社会的伦理框架:机遇、风险、原则与建议》
Minds Mach (Dordr). 2018;28(4):689-707. doi: 10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
4
State-of-the-art in artificial neural network applications: A survey.人工神经网络应用的最新进展:一项综述。
Heliyon. 2018 Nov 23;4(11):e00938. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00938. eCollection 2018 Nov.
5
Machine learning in medicine: Addressing ethical challenges.机器学习在医学中的应用:应对伦理挑战。
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 6;15(11):e1002689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002689. eCollection 2018 Nov.
6
A simple approach to ranking a group of aggregated fuzzy utilities.一种对一组聚合模糊效用进行排序的简单方法。
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 1997;27(1):26-35. doi: 10.1109/3477.552183.