Lubin Jeffrey S, Brooke Justin, Bhide Mohit S
Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA.
Cureus. 2025 Apr 18;17(4):e82505. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82505. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Introduction This study presents a direct comparison of prone, kneeling, and straddling provider positions during endotracheal intubation of a supine patient on the ground, focusing on success rates, time, and ease of intubation. Methods Forty-five prehospital providers from a single Emergency Medical Services (EMS) program performed intubations on a manikin using a McGrath video laryngoscope (Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA) in prone, kneeling, and straddling positions. Each provider had three attempts per position, with success defined as the endotracheal tube passing through the vocal cords. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Bonferroni corrections were used for statistical analysis. Results The kneeling position had the highest success rate (97.8% on all three attempts), followed by the prone position (91.1%). The straddling position had the lowest success rate (66.7%). Median intubation times were 8.8 seconds for prone, 9.8 seconds for kneeling, and 22.0 seconds for straddling. Statistically significant differences were found between the straddling position and both the kneeling and prone positions (p < 0.001). Conclusion Providers were most successful and efficient in the kneeling and prone positions for intubating patients on the ground. The straddling position was the least effective and required more time. These findings suggest that training programs should emphasize kneeling and prone positions to improve prehospital airway management.
引言 本研究对在地面上为仰卧患者进行气管插管时,施救者采用俯卧位、跪位和跨骑位的情况进行了直接比较,重点关注成功率、时间和插管的难易程度。方法 来自同一个紧急医疗服务(EMS)项目的45名院前急救人员使用麦格拉斯视频喉镜(美敦力公司,美国明尼阿波利斯),在模拟人上分别采用俯卧位、跪位和跨骑位进行插管操作。每位急救人员在每个体位下有三次尝试机会,成功定义为气管导管通过声带。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验和Bonferroni校正进行统计分析。结果 跪位的成功率最高(三次尝试的成功率均为97.8%),其次是俯卧位(91.1%)。跨骑位的成功率最低(66.7%)。俯卧位的插管中位时间为8.8秒,跪位为9.8秒,跨骑位为22.0秒。跨骑位与跪位和俯卧位之间均存在统计学显著差异(p < 0.001)。结论 对于在地面上为患者进行插管,施救者采用跪位和俯卧位时最为成功且高效。跨骑位效果最差且耗时更长。这些研究结果表明,培训项目应强调跪位和俯卧位,以改善院前气道管理。