• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于躺在地上的仰卧患者进行视频辅助喉镜检查时的最佳操作者位置

Optimal Provider Position for Video-Assisted Laryngoscopy of a Supine Patient on the Floor.

作者信息

Lubin Jeffrey S, Brooke Justin, Bhide Mohit S

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Apr 18;17(4):e82505. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82505. eCollection 2025 Apr.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.82505
PMID:40385758
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12085806/
Abstract

Introduction This study presents a direct comparison of prone, kneeling, and straddling provider positions during endotracheal intubation of a supine patient on the ground, focusing on success rates, time, and ease of intubation. Methods Forty-five prehospital providers from a single Emergency Medical Services (EMS) program performed intubations on a manikin using a McGrath video laryngoscope (Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA) in prone, kneeling, and straddling positions. Each provider had three attempts per position, with success defined as the endotracheal tube passing through the vocal cords. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Bonferroni corrections were used for statistical analysis. Results The kneeling position had the highest success rate (97.8% on all three attempts), followed by the prone position (91.1%). The straddling position had the lowest success rate (66.7%). Median intubation times were 8.8 seconds for prone, 9.8 seconds for kneeling, and 22.0 seconds for straddling. Statistically significant differences were found between the straddling position and both the kneeling and prone positions (p < 0.001). Conclusion Providers were most successful and efficient in the kneeling and prone positions for intubating patients on the ground. The straddling position was the least effective and required more time. These findings suggest that training programs should emphasize kneeling and prone positions to improve prehospital airway management.

摘要

引言 本研究对在地面上为仰卧患者进行气管插管时,施救者采用俯卧位、跪位和跨骑位的情况进行了直接比较,重点关注成功率、时间和插管的难易程度。方法 来自同一个紧急医疗服务(EMS)项目的45名院前急救人员使用麦格拉斯视频喉镜(美敦力公司,美国明尼阿波利斯),在模拟人上分别采用俯卧位、跪位和跨骑位进行插管操作。每位急救人员在每个体位下有三次尝试机会,成功定义为气管导管通过声带。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验和Bonferroni校正进行统计分析。结果 跪位的成功率最高(三次尝试的成功率均为97.8%),其次是俯卧位(91.1%)。跨骑位的成功率最低(66.7%)。俯卧位的插管中位时间为8.8秒,跪位为9.8秒,跨骑位为22.0秒。跨骑位与跪位和俯卧位之间均存在统计学显著差异(p < 0.001)。结论 对于在地面上为患者进行插管,施救者采用跪位和俯卧位时最为成功且高效。跨骑位效果最差且耗时更长。这些研究结果表明,培训项目应强调跪位和俯卧位,以改善院前气道管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a93/12085806/9a702297a2ff/cureus-0017-00000082505-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a93/12085806/9a702297a2ff/cureus-0017-00000082505-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a93/12085806/9a702297a2ff/cureus-0017-00000082505-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimal Provider Position for Video-Assisted Laryngoscopy of a Supine Patient on the Floor.对于躺在地上的仰卧患者进行视频辅助喉镜检查时的最佳操作者位置
Cureus. 2025 Apr 18;17(4):e82505. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82505. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
A randomized comparison of rescuer positions for intubation on the ground.地面上气管插管时施救者体位的随机对照比较。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 1997 Apr-Jun;1(2):96-9. doi: 10.1080/10903129708958796.
3
Rescuer position for tracheal intubation on the ground.
Resuscitation. 2003 Jan;56(1):83-9. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(02)00293-9.
4
Success Rate on Endotracheal Intubation with Prone versus Kneeling Position in Mannequin Model with Limitation of Neck Movement: A Cross Over Study.颈部活动受限的人体模型中俯卧位与跪姿行气管插管的成功率:一项交叉研究
Open Access Emerg Med. 2022 Apr 19;14:177-182. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S360169. eCollection 2022.
5
Airway Management in Disaster Response: A Manikin Study Comparing Direct and Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation by Prehospital Providers in Level C Personal Protective Equipment.灾害应对中的气道管理:一项人体模型研究,比较在C级个人防护装备下,院前急救人员使用直接喉镜和视频喉镜进行气管插管的情况。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Aug;32(4):352-356. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17000188. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
6
Comparison of Hyperangulated and Standard Geometry Video Laryngoscopy Tracheal Intubation for Prehospital Care in a Manikin: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.头高脚低位与标准头位视频喉镜经口气管插管在模拟现场急救中的比较:一项随机对照交叉试验。
Air Med J. 2021 Sep-Oct;40(5):317-321. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
7
A Comparison of Paramedic First Pass Endotracheal Intubation Success Rate of the VividTrac VT-A 100, GlideScope Ranger, and Direct Laryngoscopy Under Simulated Prehospital Cervical Spinal Immobilization Conditions in a Cadaveric Model.在尸体模型模拟的院前颈椎固定条件下,VividTrac VT - A 100可视喉镜、GlideScope Ranger可视喉镜和直接喉镜用于护理人员首次经气管插管成功率的比较
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Dec;32(6):621-624. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17006872. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
8
The Production, Assessment, and Utility of 3D-Printed Video Laryngoscopes in Eastern India: A Low-Cost Alternative to Conventional Video Laryngoscopes.印度东部3D打印视频喉镜的生产、评估及效用:传统视频喉镜的低成本替代方案
Cureus. 2024 May 15;16(5):e60386. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60386. eCollection 2024 May.
9
Success rates and endotracheal tube insertion times of experienced emergency physicians using five video laryngoscopes: a randomised trial in a simulated trapped car accident victim.经验丰富的急诊医师使用 5 种视频喉镜的成功率和气管插管时间:模拟被困车中事故受害者的随机试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Dec;28(12):849-58. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834c7c7f.
10
Video laryngoscopy in pre-hospital critical care - a quality improvement study.院前重症监护中的视频喉镜检查——一项质量改进研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Jun 13;24:84. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0276-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Current trends in emergency airway management: a clinical review.急诊气道管理的当前趋势:一项临床综述。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;11(3):243-258. doi: 10.15441/ceem.23.173. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
2
Evidence-Based Guideline for Prehospital Airway Management.基于证据的院前气道管理指南。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024;28(4):545-557. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2281363. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
3
Current Considerations in Emergency Airway Management.急诊气道管理的当前考量
Curr Emerg Hosp Med Rep. 2022;10(4):73-86. doi: 10.1007/s40138-022-00255-y. Epub 2022 Dec 3.
4
The success of pre-hospital tracheal intubation by different pre-hospital providers: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.不同院前提供者行院前气管插管术的成功率:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2017 Feb 14;21(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1603-7.
5
Head-Elevated Patient Positioning Decreases Complications of Emergent Tracheal Intubation in the Ward and Intensive Care Unit.床头抬高的患者体位可降低病房和重症监护病房中紧急气管插管的并发症。
Anesth Analg. 2016 Apr;122(4):1101-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001184.
6
Estimates of sedation in patients undergoing endotracheal intubation in US EDs.美国急诊科行气管插管患者镇静的评估。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;31(1):222-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
7
Interruptions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation from paramedic endotracheal intubation.护理人员气管插管导致的心肺复苏中断。
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;54(5):645-652.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.05.024. Epub 2009 Jul 2.
8
Environmental factors encountered during out-of-hospital intubation attempts.院外插管尝试过程中遇到的环境因素。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008 Jul-Sep;12(3):286-9. doi: 10.1080/10903120802100480.
9
Out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation: where are we?院外气管插管:我们目前的情况如何?
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Jun;47(6):532-41. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.01.016. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
10
Paramedic intubation errors: isolated events or symptoms of larger problems?护理人员插管失误:是孤立事件还是更大问题的症状?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Mar-Apr;25(2):501-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.2.501.