• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年作为共同设计者:加纳北部青年的观点如何塑造心理健康干预的基础

Adolescents as Co-Designers: How Youth Perspectives Can Shape the Foundation for Mental Health Interventions in Northern Ghana.

作者信息

Leung Claudia L, Goka Priscilla Kukua, Atangongo Barnabas, Bingle Mohammed Mansur Musah, Adu Ishmael, Atchulo Abdul Rashid, Boateng Laud, Huang Keng-Yen, Laiteerapong Neda, Limann Gbana, Volerman Anna, Amadu Peter Mintir, Koomson William Frank Hill

机构信息

University of Chicago Biological Sciences Division.

University for Development Studies School of Medicine.

出版信息

Res Sq. 2025 May 8:rs.3.rs-6279575. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6279575/v1.

DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6279575/v1
PMID:40386433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12083651/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adolescents in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face significant mental health challenges, yet their voices are often underrepresented in intervention design. Co-design approaches, such as human-centered design, offer a promising approach to tailor interventions to specific needs and context; however, this requires careful adaption in LMICs where resources, design experience, and cultural factors impact engagement and efficacy. This study documents how human-centered design was adapted to engage adolescents in co-designing a school-based mental health intervention, highlighting the contextualization of co-design methods to the Ghanaian sociocultural context and the unique participation of youth.

METHODS

Guided by the first two phases of human-centered design, we conducted two workshops with 24 students from 12 public senior high schools in Tamale, Ghana. Workshop 1 (Inspiration) explored adolescent perspectives on mental health using structured case-based discussions guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Workshop 2 (Ideation) focused on identifying preferred mental health prevention strategies using interactive, choice-based activities. To accommodate cognitive and sociocultural factors, workshops incorporated structured facilitation, visual analogies, peer-driven engagement, and scaffolded decision-making. Qualitative data from discussions, facilitator notes, and artifacts were analyzed thematically.

RESULTS

Workshop 1 (Inspiration) identified key adolescent mental health concerns, including stigma, confidentiality fears, and peer and family influences. Gender-segregated discussions provided insights into culturally-specific challenges, such as substance use norms among boys and gendered expectations limiting girls' access to support. Workshop 2 (Ideation) led to the prioritization of five school-based prevention strategies: teacher training, mental health curricular integration, mentorship programs, teaching positive thinking and mindfulness, and using entertainment-based methods for mental health education. Adolescents shifted from viewing mental health challenges as individual struggles to recognizing the role of schools and communities in prevention. An adolescent advisory board was formed to sustain youth engagement in intervention refinement.

CONCLUSIONS

Contextualized co-design methods can meaningfully engage adolescents in LMICs, leading to culturally grounded and actionable mental health interventions. Structured facilitation enhances the feasibility and authenticity of youth-driven co-design, contributing methodological insights for implementation science in resource-limited settings. This study provides a replicable framework to apply to diverse LMIC contexts and health topics and elevates youth voices in shaping effective, sustainable interventions.

摘要

背景

低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的青少年面临重大的心理健康挑战,但在干预设计中他们的声音往往未得到充分体现。共同设计方法,如以用户为中心的设计,为根据特定需求和背景量身定制干预措施提供了一种有前景的方法;然而,在资源、设计经验和文化因素会影响参与度和效果的低收入和中等收入国家,这需要谨慎调整。本研究记录了如何调整以用户为中心的设计,让青少年参与共同设计一项基于学校的心理健康干预措施,突出了共同设计方法在加纳社会文化背景下的情境化以及青少年的独特参与。

方法

以前两个阶段的以用户为中心的设计为指导,我们在加纳塔马利的12所公立高中与24名学生举办了两次工作坊。工作坊1(灵感启发)使用由实施研究综合框架(CFIR)指导的结构化案例讨论,探讨青少年对心理健康的看法。工作坊2(构思)专注于通过互动式、基于选择的活动确定首选的心理健康预防策略。为了适应认知和社会文化因素,工作坊采用了结构化引导、视觉类比、同伴驱动参与和支架式决策。对讨论、主持人笔记和工件中的定性数据进行了主题分析。

结果

工作坊1(灵感启发)确定了青少年关键的心理健康问题,包括污名化、对保密性的担忧以及同伴和家庭的影响。按性别分组的讨论提供了对特定文化挑战的见解,例如男孩中的物质使用规范以及性别期望限制女孩获得支持。工作坊2(构思)导致优先考虑五项基于学校的预防策略:教师培训、心理健康课程整合、指导计划、教授积极思维和正念以及使用基于娱乐的方法进行心理健康教育。青少年从将心理健康挑战视为个人挣扎,转变为认识到学校和社区在预防中的作用。成立了一个青少年咨询委员会,以维持青少年对干预措施优化的参与。

结论

情境化的共同设计方法可以让低收入和中等收入国家的青少年有意义地参与进来,从而产生基于文化且可行的心理健康干预措施。结构化引导提高了青少年驱动的共同设计的可行性和真实性,为资源有限环境中的实施科学提供了方法学见解。本研究提供了一个可复制的框架,可应用于不同的低收入和中等收入国家背景及健康主题,并提升青少年在塑造有效、可持续干预措施方面的声音。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13af/12083651/0e3638995519/nihpp-rs6279575v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13af/12083651/0e3638995519/nihpp-rs6279575v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13af/12083651/0e3638995519/nihpp-rs6279575v1-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Adolescents as Co-Designers: How Youth Perspectives Can Shape the Foundation for Mental Health Interventions in Northern Ghana.青少年作为共同设计者:加纳北部青年的观点如何塑造心理健康干预的基础
Res Sq. 2025 May 8:rs.3.rs-6279575. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6279575/v1.
2
Student, teacher, and caregiver perceptions on implementing mental health interventions in Ugandan schools.学生、教师和护理人员对在乌干达学校实施心理健康干预措施的看法。
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Jan-Dec;2. doi: 10.1177/26334895211051290. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
3
An Application of Evidence-Based Approaches to Engage Young People in the Design of a Global Mental Health Databank.循证方法在全球精神卫生数据库设计中吸引年轻人参与的应用。
Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e14172. doi: 10.1111/hex.14172.
4
An implementation evaluation of a sports-based health intervention for underrepresented middle school youth in Philadelphia.一项在费城代表性不足的中学生中开展基于运动的健康干预的实施评估。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Oct 6;14(10):588-597. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibae039.
5
Implementing combined WHO mhGAP and adapted group interpersonal psychotherapy to address depression and mental health needs of pregnant adolescents in Kenyan primary health care settings (INSPIRE): a study protocol for pilot feasibility trial of the integrated intervention in LMIC settings.在肯尼亚初级卫生保健机构实施世界卫生组织mhGAP综合干预措施与改良的团体人际心理治疗,以满足怀孕青少年的抑郁和心理健康需求(激励计划):一项在低收入和中等收入国家开展综合干预试点可行性试验的研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Sep 22;6:136. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00652-8. eCollection 2020.
6
Evidence and gap map report: Social and Behavior Change Communication (SBCC) interventions for strengthening HIV prevention and research among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).证据与差距地图报告:在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)加强青少年女孩和年轻女性(AGYW)中艾滋病毒预防及研究的社会和行为改变沟通(SBCC)干预措施
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 10;19(1):e1297. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1297. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
8
A qualitative process evaluation of community-based participatory research and human-centered design in the 'Let's talk about vaccines' approach in Mozambique and Malawi.对莫桑比克和马拉维“让我们谈谈疫苗”方法中基于社区的参与式研究和以人为本设计的定性过程评估。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Feb 21;11(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00677-4.
9
Digital Mental Health Interventions for Adolescents in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Scoping Review.数字心理健康干预措施在中低收入国家青少年中的应用:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 29;26:e51376. doi: 10.2196/51376.
10
Evidence and Gap Map of Whole-School Interventions Promoting Mental Health and Preventing Risk Behaviours in Adolescence: Programme Component Mapping Within the Health-Promoting Schools Framework: An evidence and gap map.促进青少年心理健康和预防风险行为的全学校干预措施的证据与差距图:健康促进学校框架内的计划组成部分映射:一份证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 10;21(1):e70024. doi: 10.1002/cl2.70024. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Co-creation methods for public health research - characteristics, benefits, and challenges: a Health CASCADE scoping review.公共卫生研究的共创方法——特点、益处及挑战:一项健康级联范围综述
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Mar 6;25(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02514-4.
2
Feasibility and acceptability of FOotpaths foR adolescent MAternal mental HeAlth (FOR MAMA): A co-designed intervention for pregnant adolescents in Malawi.青少年孕产妇心理健康步道计划(FOR MAMA)的可行性与可接受性:一项为马拉维怀孕青少年共同设计的干预措施
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2024 Oct 24;11:e97. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2024.76. eCollection 2024.
3
Prevalence, correlates, and reasons for substance use among adolescents aged 10-17 in Ghana: a cross-sectional convergent parallel mixed-method study.
加纳 10-17 岁青少年物质使用的流行率、相关性及其原因:一项横断面汇聚平行混合方法研究。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2024 Feb 29;19(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13011-024-00600-2.
4
Conducting co-creation for public health in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and key informant perspectives on implementation barriers and facilitators.在中低收入国家开展公共卫生共创:系统评价和主要知情人对实施障碍和促进因素的看法。
Global Health. 2024 Jan 17;20(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12992-024-01014-2.
5
Transforming mental health systems globally: principles and policy recommendations.全球精神卫生系统转型:原则与政策建议
Lancet. 2023 Aug 19;402(10402):656-666. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00918-2.
6
Review: Patient engagement in child, adolescent, and youth mental health care research - a scoping review.综述:儿童、青少年和青年心理健康护理研究中的患者参与——一项范围综述。
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2023 Nov;28(4):524-535. doi: 10.1111/camh.12615. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
7
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.基于用户反馈的更新的实施研究综合框架。
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.
8
The use of co-production, co-design and co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions: a systematic review.利用共同生产、共同设计和共同创作来调动健康状况管理中的知识:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 7;22(1):877. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08079-y.
9
Researchers' Perspectives on Digital Mental Health Intervention Co-Design With Marginalized Community Stakeholder Youth and Families.研究人员对与边缘化社区利益相关者青年及家庭共同设计数字心理健康干预措施的看法。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 22;13:867460. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.867460. eCollection 2022.
10
Agents of Change for Mental Health: A Survey of Young People's Aspirations for Participation Across Five Low- and Middle-Income Countries.心理健康变革推动者:对五个低收入和中等收入国家年轻人参与意愿的调查
J Adolesc Health. 2023 Jan;72(1S):S96-S104. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.10.037. Epub 2022 Mar 3.