Zhang Na, Ren Xiaoyu, Xu Zhen
School of Business, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing, China.
School of Medicine, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, Hebei, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 May 19;15(1):17326. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02524-8.
General practice students are faced with greater stress and poorer career prospects than other medical students. Self-leadership has an important impact on their coping styles. However, understanding these relationships is complicated by the fact that six types of self-leadership strategies can be combined in various ways based on their levels and shapes. Latent profile analysis, a person-centered method, has helped in addressing these complexities. This study aimed to explore the different profiles of self-leadership among general practice students and differences between different self-leadership profiles and coping styles. A total of 336 general practice students from China were investigated via a self-leadership scale and coping styles scale. Mplus 8.0 was used for latent profile analysis, and BCH was used for subsequent analysis. We identified four profiles of self-leadership: low, medium, medium-high and high. We also found that these self-leadership profiles differentially predicted general practice students' coping styles. Our findings offer a theoretical basis for targeted interventions aimed at enhancing self-leadership in general practice students, thereby reducing stress and improving coping mechanisms.
与其他医学生相比,全科医学专业学生面临着更大的压力和更差的职业前景。自我领导对他们的应对方式有重要影响。然而,由于六种自我领导策略可以根据其水平和形式以各种方式组合,理解这些关系变得复杂。潜在剖面分析是一种以人为主的方法,有助于解决这些复杂性问题。本研究旨在探讨全科医学专业学生自我领导的不同剖面,以及不同自我领导剖面与应对方式之间的差异。通过自我领导量表和应对方式量表对来自中国的336名全科医学专业学生进行了调查。使用Mplus 8.0进行潜在剖面分析,并使用BCH进行后续分析。我们确定了四种自我领导剖面:低、中、中高和高。我们还发现,这些自我领导剖面在预测全科医学专业学生的应对方式上存在差异。我们的研究结果为旨在增强全科医学专业学生自我领导能力的针对性干预提供了理论基础,从而减轻压力并改善应对机制。