Cunningham-Oakes Edward, Perez-Sepulveda Blanca M, Li Yan, Hinton Jay C D, Nelson Charlotte A, McIntyre K Marie, Wardeh Maya, Haldenby Sam, Gregory Richard, Iturriza-Gómara Miren, Hertz-Fowler Christiane, O'Brien Sarah J, Cunliffe Nigel A, Darby Alistair C
Institute of Infection, University of Liverpool, Veterinary & Ecological Sciences, Liverpool, UK.
NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Gastrointestinal Infections, Liverpool, UK.
Genome Med. 2025 May 20;17(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13073-025-01478-w.
Current surveillance of diarrhoeal disease is hindered by limitations of traditional diagnostic approaches, which often fail to identify the causative organism, particularly for novel or hard-to-culture bacterial pathogens. Sequencing nucleic acids directly from stool can overcome such constraints, but such approaches need to reliably detect pathogens identifiable by conventional methods.
As part of the INTEGRATE study, we analysed stool microbiomes from 1067 patients with gastroenteritis symptoms using direct sequencing, and compared findings with standard diagnostic techniques (culture, immunoassay, microscopy, and single-target PCR) and molecular assays (Luminex xTAG GPP) for detection of bacterial and viral pathogens in the UK.
We found strong positive correlations between metatranscriptomic reads and traditional diagnostics for six out of 15 pathogens. The metatranscriptomic data were highly correlated with the Luminex assay for eight out of 14 pathogens. In contrast, metagenomic sequencing only showed a strong positive correlation with traditional diagnostics for three of 15 pathogens, and with Luminex for four of 14 pathogens. Compared with metagenomics, metatranscriptomics had increased sensitivity of detection for four pathogens, while metagenomics was more effective for detecting five pathogens. Metatranscriptomics gave near-complete transcriptome coverage for Human mastadenovirus F and detected Cryptosporidium via identification of Cryptosporidium parvum virus (CSpV1). A comprehensive transcriptomic profile of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis was recovered from the stool of a patient with a laboratory-confirmed Salmonella infection. Furthermore, comparison of RNA/DNA ratios between pathogen-positive and pathogen-negative samples demonstrated that metatranscriptomics can distinguish pathogen-positive/negative samples and provide insights into pathogen biology. Higher RNA/DNA ratios were observed in samples that tested positive via gold-standard diagnostics.
This study highlights the power of directly sequencing nucleic acids from human samples to augment gastrointestinal pathogen surveillance and clinical diagnostics. Metatranscriptomics was most effective for identifying a wide range of pathogens and showed superior sensitivity. We propose that metatranscriptomics should be considered for future diagnosis and surveillance of gastrointestinal pathogens. We assembled a rich data resource of paired metagenomic and metatranscriptomic datasets, direct from patient stool samples, and have made these data publicly available to enhance the understanding of pathogens associated with infectious intestinal diseases.
当前腹泻病监测受到传统诊断方法的限制,这些方法往往无法识别致病生物体,尤其是对于新型或难以培养的细菌病原体。直接从粪便中对核酸进行测序可以克服此类限制,但此类方法需要可靠地检测出可通过传统方法识别的病原体。
作为综合研究的一部分,我们使用直接测序法分析了1067例有肠胃炎症状患者的粪便微生物群,并将结果与英国用于检测细菌和病毒病原体的标准诊断技术(培养、免疫测定、显微镜检查和单靶点聚合酶链反应)以及分子检测方法(Luminex xTAG GPP)进行了比较。
我们发现,15种病原体中有6种的宏转录组读数与传统诊断方法之间存在强正相关。14种病原体中有8种的宏转录组数据与Luminex检测高度相关。相比之下,宏基因组测序仅显示15种病原体中有3种与传统诊断方法存在强正相关,14种病原体中有4种与Luminex检测存在强正相关。与宏基因组学相比,宏转录组学对4种病原体的检测灵敏度有所提高,而宏基因组学对5种病原体的检测更有效。宏转录组学对人腺病毒F实现了近乎完整的转录组覆盖,并通过鉴定微小隐孢子虫病毒(CSpV1)检测到了隐孢子虫。从一名实验室确诊感染沙门氏菌的患者粪便中获得了肠炎沙门氏菌血清型肠炎亚种的全面转录组图谱。此外,对病原体阳性和阴性样本之间的RNA/DNA比率进行比较表明,宏转录组学可以区分病原体阳性/阴性样本,并为病原体生物学提供见解。在通过金标准诊断检测呈阳性的样本中观察到了更高的RNA/DNA比率。
本研究强调了直接对人类样本中的核酸进行测序在加强胃肠道病原体监测和临床诊断方面的作用。宏转录组学在识别多种病原体方面最为有效,且显示出更高的灵敏度。我们建议在未来胃肠道病原体的诊断和监测中应考虑采用宏转录组学。我们直接从患者粪便样本中收集了丰富的宏基因组和宏转录组配对数据集资源,并已将这些数据公开,以增进对与感染性肠道疾病相关病原体的了解。