Miwa Toru
Otolaryngology, Teikyo University Hospital, Kanagawa, JPN.
Cureus. 2025 Apr 19;17(4):e82597. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82597. eCollection 2025 Apr.
This study aimed to compare postural sway characteristics and evaluate postural sway as a potential biomarker for persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD) to clarify diagnostic boundaries. A total of 36 participants were enrolled, including 26 (72.2%) with PPPD, five (13.9%) with psychogenic vertigo, and five (13.9%) healthy controls. Postural sway tests were conducted on all participants, measuring the center of pressure (CoP) area, CoP length, and Romberg ratio. A subgroup analysis was also performed based on the presence of preceding organic diseases. The postural sway tests were conducted using a force platform under standardized conditions. Each participant stood barefoot on a stable surface for 60 seconds with eyes open and then with eyes closed, while data were sampled at 100 Hz. The results showed that both the PPPD and psychogenic vertigo groups exhibited significantly larger CoP areas compared to healthy controls, indicating increased postural instability. However, no significant difference was found between the PPPD and psychogenic vertigo groups. While CoP length in the PPPD group was similar to that of healthy controls, the psychogenic vertigo group showed a significantly greater CoP length with eyes closed. These findings suggest that patients with PPPD maintain fine postural control despite increased sway, indicating preserved central nervous system adaptation. No differences were observed between primary and secondary PPPD (s-PPPD). Overall, the postural sway characteristics of PPPD closely resembled those of psychogenic vertigo, supporting the notion that both conditions share features of functional dizziness disorders. Future research should include larger, age- and sex-matched cohorts, along with advanced posturography methods and detailed symptom assessments, to refine diagnostic criteria.
本研究旨在比较姿势摆动特征,并评估姿势摆动作为持续性姿势-感知性头晕(PPPD)潜在生物标志物的情况,以明确诊断界限。共招募了36名参与者,其中26名(72.2%)患有PPPD,5名(13.9%)患有心因性眩晕,5名(13.9%)为健康对照。对所有参与者进行姿势摆动测试,测量压力中心(CoP)面积、CoP长度和罗姆伯格比率。还根据既往是否存在器质性疾病进行了亚组分析。姿势摆动测试在标准化条件下使用测力平台进行。每位参与者赤脚站在稳定表面上,睁眼60秒,然后闭眼,同时以100Hz的频率采集数据。结果显示,与健康对照相比,PPPD组和心因性眩晕组的CoP面积均显著增大,表明姿势稳定性增加。然而,PPPD组和心因性眩晕组之间未发现显著差异。虽然PPPD组的CoP长度与健康对照相似,但心因性眩晕组闭眼时CoP长度显著更长。这些发现表明,PPPD患者尽管摆动增加,但仍能保持良好的姿势控制,表明中枢神经系统适应性得以保留。原发性和继发性PPPD(s-PPPD)之间未观察到差异。总体而言,PPPD的姿势摆动特征与心因性眩晕非常相似,支持了这两种情况都具有功能性头晕障碍特征的观点。未来的研究应纳入更大规模、年龄和性别匹配的队列,以及先进的姿势描记法和详细的症状评估,以完善诊断标准。