Lee Hyun S, Renjith Keerthi, Misbah Afrah, Ahmed Omer, Ramakrishnan Sanjana, Jawish Mohammad
Department of Medicine, Rochester Regional Health, Rochester, USA.
Cureus. 2025 Apr 19;17(4):e82558. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82558. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Rate of correction in severe hypernatremia remains controversial. Although data increasingly supports rapid correction, hypernatremia is still often treated similarly to hyponatremia with a maximum rate of correction of 8-12 mmol/L per day due to concerns of neurological complications. This retrospective cohort study investigated the association between the rate of correction in hypernatremia and mortality. A secondary objective was to evaluate whether any adverse neurological outcomes were attributable to rapid correction.
A retrospective cohort study of patients with severe hypernatremia (serum sodium ≥155 mmol/L) was conducted across a health system in the United States between January and December 2023. Rates of correction were calculated using the time between peak serum sodium values and first eunatremic (serum sodium ≤145 mmol/L) or last known values. Patients were categorized by their hypernatremia correction rates into slow (≤8 mmol/L/day) or rapid (>8 mmol/L/day) correction groups. Mortality was compared between the two groups using Fisher's exact test and survival analysis for 90-day and one-year intervals. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate for association between the rate of correction and mortality.
Among 150 included patients, 33 underwent rapid correction. The slow correction group had higher Charlson Comorbidity Indices compared to the rapid correction group. No significant differences in 90-day (43% vs 33%, p=0.42) and one-year mortality rates (63% vs 52%, p=0.23) were observed between the slow and rapid correction groups. Subsequent chart review revealed no documented adverse neurological outcomes attributable to rapid correction. Multivariate analysis did not identify a significant association between correction rate and mortality (hazard ratio 1.00, p=0.27).
These findings add to the growing evidence challenging traditional concerns about rapid correction of hypernatremia in adults, suggesting that rapid correction rates exceeding 8 mmol/L/day do not increase mortality or cause adverse neurological events. These results support reconsidering rigid correction limits and highlight the need for further research on individualized treatment strategies.
重度高钠血症的纠正速度仍存在争议。尽管越来越多的数据支持快速纠正,但由于担心神经并发症,高钠血症的治疗仍常常与低钠血症类似,每天最大纠正速度为8 - 12 mmol/L。这项回顾性队列研究调查了高钠血症纠正速度与死亡率之间的关联。第二个目标是评估快速纠正是否会导致任何不良神经结局。
2023年1月至12月在美国一个医疗系统中对重度高钠血症(血清钠≥155 mmol/L)患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。使用血清钠峰值与首次血钠正常(血清钠≤145 mmol/L)或最后已知值之间的时间来计算纠正速度。根据高钠血症纠正速度将患者分为缓慢(≤8 mmol/L/天)或快速(>8 mmol/L/天)纠正组。使用Fisher精确检验和90天及1年间隔的生存分析比较两组之间的死亡率。进行多变量Cox回归分析以评估纠正速度与死亡率之间的关联。
在纳入的150例患者中,33例接受了快速纠正。缓慢纠正组的Charlson合并症指数高于快速纠正组。缓慢和快速纠正组之间在90天(43%对33%,p = 0.42)和1年死亡率(63%对52%,p = 0.23)方面未观察到显著差异。随后的病历审查显示,没有记录到因快速纠正导致的不良神经结局。多变量分析未发现纠正速度与死亡率之间存在显著关联(风险比1.00,p = 0.27)。
这些发现进一步增加了越来越多的证据,对成人高钠血症快速纠正的传统担忧提出了挑战,表明超过8 mmol/L/天的快速纠正速度不会增加死亡率或导致不良神经事件。这些结果支持重新考虑严格的纠正限制,并强调需要对个体化治疗策略进行进一步研究。