• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人牙龈成纤维细胞和类成骨MG-63细胞在三种用于牙种植体的不同临时水门汀上的活力与增殖的体外比较

In Vitro Comparison of the Viability and Proliferation of Human Gingival Fibroblasts and Osteoblast-like MG-63 Cells on Three Different Temporary Cements Used in Dental Implants.

作者信息

Yaghobee Siamak, Aslroosta Hoori, Hasannia Sadegh, Poursafar Farzaneh

机构信息

Dental Implant Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Front Dent. 2025 Mar 10;22:11. doi: 10.18502/fid.v22i11.18215. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.18502/fid.v22i11.18215
PMID:40390827
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12086467/
Abstract

Retained cement is an idiopathic factor contributing to early implant loss, making the selection of cement with minimal toxicity to peri-implant hard and soft tissues crucial. This study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of three types of temporary cements and titanium specimens cemented with each, following direct exposure to human gingival fibroblasts (HGF) and MG-63 osteoblast-like cells. In this in vitro study, zinc oxide-eugenol (ZOE), eugenol-free zinc oxide (ZONE), and resin (R) cements were prepared in cylindrical forms of similar dimensions. Each cement was applied to titanium disks to create cemented titanium samples. Cytotoxicity was evaluated using the MTT assay at 24 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days. Cytotoxicity was assessed on HGF and MG-63 osteoblast-like cells using the MTT assay at 24, 72 hours, and 7 days. Data analysis involved two-way and one-way ANOVA, with Tukey's post-hoc tests, and statistical significance was defined as P<0.05. All cements significantly reduced cell viability in both cell lines. None of the cements demonstrated cellular viability percentages above the minimum threshold (70%) required for biocompatibility. The cytotoxicity of the cemented titanium disks was not significantly different from that of the cement-only samples (P>0.05). Additionally, there were no significant differences in the sensitivity of MG-63 osteoblast-like cells and HGF cells to the evaluated cements. The composition of the cement played a significant role in the host cell response. This study demonstrated that dental cements could induce tissue toxicity in the gingiva and bones, ultimately affecting implant survival.

摘要

残留水门汀是导致种植体早期丢失的一个特发性因素,因此选择对种植体周围软硬组织毒性最小的水门汀至关重要。本研究旨在评估三种临时水门汀以及用每种水门汀粘结的钛样本在直接接触人牙龈成纤维细胞(HGF)和MG-63成骨样细胞后的细胞毒性。在这项体外研究中,制备了尺寸相似的圆柱形氧化锌丁香酚(ZOE)、无丁香酚氧化锌(ZONE)和树脂(R)水门汀。将每种水门汀应用于钛盘以制作粘结钛样本。在24小时、72小时和7天时使用MTT法评估细胞毒性。在24小时、72小时和7天时,使用MTT法对HGF和MG-63成骨样细胞进行细胞毒性评估。数据分析采用双向和单向方差分析以及Tukey事后检验,统计学显著性定义为P<0.05。所有水门汀均显著降低了两种细胞系中的细胞活力。没有一种水门汀的细胞活力百分比高于生物相容性所需的最低阈值(70%)。粘结钛盘的细胞毒性与仅水门汀样本的细胞毒性无显著差异(P>0.05)。此外,MG-63成骨样细胞和HGF细胞对所评估水门汀的敏感性无显著差异。水门汀的成分在宿主细胞反应中起重要作用

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a203/12086467/e6a60dcaf1a5/FID-22-11-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a203/12086467/daa1ad0621ae/FID-22-11-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a203/12086467/2980fc7ec76c/FID-22-11-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a203/12086467/e6a60dcaf1a5/FID-22-11-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a203/12086467/daa1ad0621ae/FID-22-11-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a203/12086467/2980fc7ec76c/FID-22-11-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a203/12086467/e6a60dcaf1a5/FID-22-11-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
In Vitro Comparison of the Viability and Proliferation of Human Gingival Fibroblasts and Osteoblast-like MG-63 Cells on Three Different Temporary Cements Used in Dental Implants.人牙龈成纤维细胞和类成骨MG-63细胞在三种用于牙种植体的不同临时水门汀上的活力与增殖的体外比较
Front Dent. 2025 Mar 10;22:11. doi: 10.18502/fid.v22i11.18215. eCollection 2025.
2
In Vitro Evaluation of Cell Compatibility of Dental Cements Used with Titanium Implant Components.体外评价钛种植体组件用牙体黏结剂的细胞相容性。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):e705-e712. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12784. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
3
In vitro effects of dental cements on hard and soft tissues associated with dental implants.在体条件下牙体黏固剂对与牙种植体相关的软硬组织的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jul;118(1):31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Dec 4.
4
Cytotoxicity of Dental Cements on Soft Tissue Associated with Dental Implants.牙科水门汀对牙种植体相关软组织的细胞毒性
Int J Dent. 2022 Jan 20;2022:4916464. doi: 10.1155/2022/4916464. eCollection 2022.
5
Cytotoxicity  of dental cement on soft tissue associated with dental implants at different time intervals.不同时间间隔下牙科水泥对与牙种植体相关的软组织的细胞毒性。
F1000Res. 2023 Dec 12;12:1342. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.140071.2. eCollection 2023.
6
In vitro cytotoxicity of dental implant cements on human gingival and mouse preosteoblast cell lines.
J Oral Sci. 2025 Jan 16;67(1):24-29. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.24-0306. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
7
The Interaction of Implant Luting Cements and Oral Bacteria Linked to Peri-Implant Disease: An In Vitro Analysis of Planktonic and Biofilm Growth--A Preliminary Study.种植体粘结水门汀与种植体周围疾病相关口腔细菌的相互作用:浮游菌和生物膜生长的体外分析——一项初步研究
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Dec;17(6):1029-35. doi: 10.1111/cid.12235. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
8
Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.使用ITI实心基台搭配六种粘结剂对铸件固位力的比较评估。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Aug;13(4):343-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130401.x.
9
On the understanding of zinc-oxide eugenol cement use prior to etch-rinse bonding strategies.关于在酸蚀冲洗粘结策略之前使用氧化锌丁香酚水门汀的理解。
Indian J Dent Res. 2019 May-Jun;30(3):424-427. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_302_16.
10
Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.不同黏结空间设置下制作的种植体支持的牙冠的水泥选择。
J Prosthodont. 2013 Feb;22(2):112-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00912.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Can Dental Cement Composition Affect Dental Implant Success?牙科水门汀成分会影响牙种植体的成功率吗?
ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2019 Oct 14;5(10):5116-5127. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00956. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
2
Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions.种植体周围疾病和状况:2017 年牙周病和种植体周围病分类世界研讨会第 4 工作组的共识报告。
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S286-S291. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12957.
3
In Vitro Evaluation of Cell Compatibility of Dental Cements Used with Titanium Implant Components.
体外评价钛种植体组件用牙体黏结剂的细胞相容性。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):e705-e712. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12784. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
4
Titanium Corrosion Mechanisms in the Oral Environment: A Retrieval Study.口腔环境中钛的腐蚀机制:一项检索研究。
Materials (Basel). 2013 Nov 15;6(11):5258-5274. doi: 10.3390/ma6115258.
5
In vitro effects of dental cements on hard and soft tissues associated with dental implants.在体条件下牙体黏固剂对与牙种植体相关的软硬组织的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jul;118(1):31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Dec 4.
6
Excess cement and the risk of peri-implant disease - a systematic review.过量骨水泥与种植体周围病风险:系统综述
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Oct;28(10):1278-1290. doi: 10.1111/clr.12954. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
7
Primary prevention of peri-implantitis: managing peri-implant mucositis.种植体周围炎的一级预防:处理种植体周围黏膜炎
J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Apr;42 Suppl 16:S152-7. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12369.
8
The effects of anti-infective preventive measures on the occurrence of biologic implant complications and implant loss: a systematic review.抗感染预防措施对生物植入物并发症和植入物丢失发生的影响:系统评价。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:292-307. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g5.1.
9
Clinical Factors Influencing Removal of the Cement Excess in Implant-Supported Restorations.影响种植体支持修复体中多余黏固剂去除的临床因素。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Aug;17(4):771-8. doi: 10.1111/cid.12170. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
10
A phenotypic comparison of osteoblast cell lines versus human primary osteoblasts for biomaterials testing.用于生物材料测试的成骨细胞系与人原代成骨细胞的表型比较。
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014 Aug;102(8):2636-43. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34937. Epub 2013 Sep 6.