Sharma Charu, Gothwal Meenakshi, Singh Pratibha, Dubey Kalika, Shekhawat Dolat Singh, Shekhar Shashank, Jhirwal Manisha, Singh Kuldeep
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan 342005 India.
Vyas Hospital, Jodhpur, Rajasthan India.
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2025 Apr;75(Suppl 1):422-429. doi: 10.1007/s13224-024-02032-1. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
This study endeavors to assess the efficacy of quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) as an alternative adjunctive modality to conventional karyotyping for prenatal diagnostic purposes.
In this cohort study, 464 pregnant women deemed at high risk for chromosomal aneuploidies within gestational age 12-24 weeks, spanning from January 2020 to May 2023 were enrolled. Analysis was done on 347 women who underwent both QF-PCR and karyotype.
Within this cohort, concordant QF-PCR and karyotype results were achieved in 332 (95.67%) samples with 21 women showing trisomy 21 and two trisomy 18 in the fetus with results being 100% concordant with karyotype and QF-PCR. Notably, there were no false-negative or false-positive QF-PCR results. However, eleven cases presented discordant results, revealing various genetic abnormalities, such as deletions, translocations, inversions, and mosaicism. The overall frequency of chromosomal abnormalities was 8.82% (41/464). The mean age of the pregnant women was 28.7 ± 5.54 years, with 10.7% (50/464) of women having aged > 35 years. The median gestation age for amniocentesis and CVS procedures was 16 weeks (IQR 15.6-20) and 13 weeks (IQR 12.7-13.5), respectively.
The study concluded that although QF-PCR may serve as a stand-alone diagnostic tool in some cases with appropriate pretest counseling, simultaneous karyotyping, or chromosomal microarray should be considered in pregnancies with normal QF-PCR results and abnormal USG findings such as increased nuchal translucency or structural malformations or a family history of a chromosomal disorder. Despite being a rapid and highly sensitive test, QF-PCR does not fully substitute conventional karyotype analysis.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13224-024-02032-1.
本研究旨在评估定量荧光聚合酶链反应(QF-PCR)作为传统核型分析的替代辅助方法用于产前诊断的有效性。
在这项队列研究中,纳入了2020年1月至2023年5月期间孕龄在12 - 24周、被认为有染色体非整倍体高风险的464名孕妇。对347名同时接受了QF-PCR和核型分析的女性进行了分析。
在该队列中,332份样本(95.67%)的QF-PCR和核型分析结果一致,其中21名女性的胎儿显示21三体,2名胎儿显示18三体,结果与核型分析和QF-PCR完全一致。值得注意的是,QF-PCR没有假阴性或假阳性结果。然而,有11例结果不一致,揭示了各种遗传异常,如缺失、易位、倒位和嵌合体。染色体异常的总体发生率为8.82%(41/464)。孕妇的平均年龄为28.7±5.54岁,10.7%(50/464)的女性年龄>35岁。羊膜穿刺术和绒毛取样术的中位孕周分别为16周(四分位间距15.6 - 20)和13周(四分位间距12.7 - 13.5)。
该研究得出结论,尽管在进行适当的检测前咨询的某些情况下,QF-PCR可作为独立的诊断工具,但对于QF-PCR结果正常但超声检查有异常发现(如颈项透明层增厚或结构畸形)或有染色体疾病家族史的孕妇,应考虑同时进行核型分析或染色体微阵列分析。尽管QF-PCR是一种快速且高度灵敏的检测方法,但它并不能完全替代传统的核型分析。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s13224-024-02032-1获取的补充材料。