Suppr超能文献

将职责委托给智能自主系统:挑战与益处。

Delegating Responsibilities to Intelligent Autonomous Systems: Challenges and Benefits.

作者信息

Dodig-Crnkovic Gordana, Basti Gianfranco, Holstein Tobias

机构信息

Division of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden.

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

J Bioeth Inq. 2025 May 20. doi: 10.1007/s11673-025-10428-5.

Abstract

As AI systems increasingly operate with autonomy and adaptability, the traditional boundaries of moral responsibility in techno-social systems are being challenged. This paper explores the evolving discourse on the delegation of responsibilities to intelligent autonomous agents and the ethical implications of such practices. Synthesizing recent developments in AI ethics, including concepts of distributed responsibility and ethical AI by design, the paper proposes a functionalist perspective as a framework. This perspective views moral responsibility not as an individual trait but as a role within a socio-technical system, distributed among human and artificial agents. As an example of "AI ethical by design," we present Basti and Vitiello's implementation. They suggest that AI can act as artificial moral agents by learning ethical guidelines and using Deontic Higher-Order Logic to assess decisions ethically. Motivated by the possible speed and scale beyond human supervision and ethical implications, the paper argues for "AI ethical by design," while acknowledging the distributed, shared, and dynamic nature of responsibility. This functionalist approach offers a practical framework for navigating the complexities of AI ethics in a rapidly evolving technological landscape.

摘要

随着人工智能系统越来越多地自主运行并具备适应性,技术社会系统中道德责任的传统界限正受到挑战。本文探讨了关于将责任委托给智能自主主体的不断演变的论述以及此类做法的伦理影响。综合人工智能伦理的最新发展,包括分布式责任和设计符合伦理的人工智能等概念,本文提出一种功能主义视角作为框架。这种视角将道德责任视为社会技术系统中的一种角色,而非个人特质,由人类和人工智能主体共同承担。作为“设计符合伦理的人工智能”的一个例子,我们介绍了巴斯蒂和维蒂埃洛的实现方法。他们认为,人工智能可以通过学习伦理准则并使用道义高阶逻辑对决策进行伦理评估,从而充当人工道德主体。鉴于人工智能可能超越人类监督的速度和规模以及伦理影响,本文主张“设计符合伦理的人工智能”,同时承认责任具有分布式、共享性和动态性。这种功能主义方法为在快速发展的技术环境中应对人工智能伦理的复杂性提供了一个实用框架。

相似文献

1
Delegating Responsibilities to Intelligent Autonomous Systems: Challenges and Benefits.
J Bioeth Inq. 2025 May 20. doi: 10.1007/s11673-025-10428-5.
2
Embedding responsibility in intelligent systems: from AI ethics to responsible AI ecosystems.
Sci Rep. 2023 May 18;13(1):7586. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34622-w.
5
Ethical Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Workforce Management and Policymaking: Bridging Philosophy and Practice.
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Apr 8;2025:7954013. doi: 10.1155/jonm/7954013. eCollection 2025.
7
On the ethical and moral dimensions of using artificial intelligence for evidence synthesis.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Mar 19;5(3):e0004348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004348. eCollection 2025.
8
Artificial intelligence technologies and compassion in healthcare: A systematic scoping review.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 17;13:971044. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971044. eCollection 2022.
9
Proposing a Principle-Based Approach for Teaching AI Ethics in Medical Education.
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Feb 9;10:e55368. doi: 10.2196/55368.

本文引用的文献

1
Embedding responsibility in intelligent systems: from AI ethics to responsible AI ecosystems.
Sci Rep. 2023 May 18;13(1):7586. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34622-w.
2
How AI can be a force for good.
Science. 2018 Aug 24;361(6404):751-752. doi: 10.1126/science.aat5991.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验