Helmy Asmaa K, Sidkey Nagwa M, Abdel-Aziz Marwa M, El-Hela Atef A
Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
The Regional Centre for Mycology and Biotechnology, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Sci Rep. 2025 May 20;15(1):17484. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00773-1.
Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common infections worldwide, increasing the incidence of antibiotic resistance and creating demand for alternative antimicrobial agents. Propolis, a natural antimicrobial agent, has been used in ancient folk medicine. This study evaluates the effectiveness of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) alone and in combination with honey against multidrug-resistant (MDR) uropathogens and also investigates the chemical composition of Egyptian propolis, which may be a potential therapeutic approach against MDR uropathogens. EEP was prepared, followed by column chromatographic fractionation using four different solvent systems. The ethyl acetate fraction was further fractionated through vacuum liquid chromatography (VLC). The antimicrobial activity of the EEP, propolis fractions, honey, and EEP-Honey mixture was studied, and the fraction with the best antimicrobial activity was analyzed by GC-MS and HPLC. The results indicated that EEP showed antimicrobial activity against the five MDR uropathogens with varying potential, while honey showed no activity against these pathogens. In comparison, the EEP-Honey mixture exhibited good antimicrobial synergy, with the MIC value decreasing by approximately 4-8 folds. In propolis fractionation, ethyl acetate was the best solvent for extracting antimicrobial substances from EEP, and fraction 5 (F5) was the most active fraction, with inhibition zone diameters of 30.33, 29.00, 21.58, 25.33, and 27.67 mm against MDR P. aeruginosa, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, S. saprophyticus, and C. albicans, respectively. GC-MS analysis of the F5 fraction revealed the presence of phenolics, flavonoids, terpenoids, acids, and alkaloids. In addition, HPLC polyphenol analysis identified 14 phenolic acids and flavonoid compounds with concentrations ranging from 117.36 to 5657.66 µg/g. Overall, the current findings highlighted the promising antimicrobial synergy of the EEP-Honey mixture against MDR urinary pathogens. The phytochemical analysis of propolis also identified potential bioactive compounds responsible for its biological and pharmaceutical properties.
尿路感染(UTI)是全球最常见的感染之一,它增加了抗生素耐药性的发生率,并催生了对替代抗菌剂的需求。蜂胶作为一种天然抗菌剂,已被应用于古代民间医学。本研究评估了蜂胶乙醇提取物(EEP)单独以及与蜂蜜联合使用对多重耐药(MDR)尿路病原体的有效性,还研究了埃及蜂胶的化学成分,这可能是一种针对MDR尿路病原体的潜在治疗方法。制备了EEP,随后使用四种不同的溶剂系统进行柱色谱分离。乙酸乙酯馏分通过真空液相色谱(VLC)进一步分离。研究了EEP、蜂胶馏分、蜂蜜以及EEP - 蜂蜜混合物的抗菌活性,并通过气相色谱 - 质谱联用(GC - MS)和高效液相色谱(HPLC)分析了抗菌活性最佳的馏分。结果表明,EEP对五种MDR尿路病原体表现出不同程度的抗菌活性,而蜂蜜对这些病原体无活性。相比之下,EEP - 蜂蜜混合物表现出良好的抗菌协同作用,其最低抑菌浓度(MIC)值降低了约4 - 8倍。在蜂胶分离过程中,乙酸乙酯是从EEP中提取抗菌物质的最佳溶剂,馏分5(F5)是活性最高的馏分,对MDR铜绿假单胞菌、大肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、腐生葡萄球菌和白色念珠菌的抑菌圈直径分别为30.33、29.00、21.58、25.33和27.67毫米。F5馏分的GC - MS分析显示存在酚类、黄酮类、萜类、酸类和生物碱类。此外,HPLC多酚分析鉴定出14种酚酸和黄酮类化合物,浓度范围为117.36至5657.66微克/克。总体而言,当前研究结果突出了EEP - 蜂蜜混合物对MDR尿路病原体具有良好的抗菌协同作用。蜂胶的植物化学分析还鉴定出了具有其生物学和药学特性的潜在生物活性化合物。