Hofhansl Angelika, Zlabinger Gerhard, Bach Lena, Röhrs Josefine, Mayer Anna-Maria, Rieder Anita, Wagner-Menghin Michaela
Medical University of Vienna, Teaching Center, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna, Center for Public Health, Vienna, Austria.
GMS J Med Educ. 2025 Feb 17;42(1):Doc5. doi: 10.3205/zma001729. eCollection 2025.
Clerkships for supervised learning of clinical skills are part of modern medical curricula. The availability of clerkship placements in clinics and the provision of competent supervision are essential for effective work-based learning. The scheduling of compulsory and elective work-based learning opportunities for undergraduate medical students (UGMS), especially when their numbers are high, results in varying clerkship sequences, which can influence career plans and examination outcomes. The effect of different clerkship sequences on students' impressions of clinical supervision remains unclear. Therefore, this study describes subject-specific differences in students' perceptions of clinical supervision during surgical (SC) and internal medicine (IMC) clerkships and addresses the impact of varying clerkship sequences and increasing clinical experience thereon.
In this survey, 1,017 final-year students at the Medical University of Vienna (from 2015 to 2019) retrospectively evaluated the quality of supervision they received during the SC and IMC using a newly piloted questionnaire on supervisory roles.
Students described their supervisors as less likely to exercise the roles of gatekeeper/safeguarding, training, and mentoring during the SC than during the IMC. During IMC, the supervisory activities received most often were to ensure patient and trainee safety, whereas during SC, it was to ensure trainee safety and to teach techniques and procedures. Ensuring an appropriate level of clinical duty was the third highest priority in both clerkships. Students' general clinical experience influenced how they perceived the supervision, with students completing SC later in their pathway reporting having received similar levels of supervision in both clerkships.
Supervision experiences during the first clerkship appear to shape students' expectations of subsequent supervision. Providing additional support to foster a strong supervisory relationship, tailored to meet the specific supervision needs of UGMS newly entering year 6, could benefit both supervisors and students.
临床技能的监督学习实习是现代医学课程的一部分。临床实习岗位的可用性以及提供称职的监督对于有效的基于工作的学习至关重要。本科医学生(UGMS)必修和选修的基于工作的学习机会的安排,尤其是当学生人数众多时,会导致不同的实习顺序,这可能会影响职业规划和考试结果。不同实习顺序对学生临床监督印象的影响尚不清楚。因此,本研究描述了学生在外科(SC)和内科(IMC)实习期间对临床监督认知的学科差异,并探讨了不同实习顺序和不断增加的临床经验对其的影响。
在本次调查中,维也纳医科大学的1017名最后一年学生(2015年至2019年)使用一份新试点的关于监督角色的问卷,回顾性评估了他们在SC和IMC实习期间所接受监督的质量。
学生们表示,与IMC实习相比,他们的 supervisors 在SC实习期间行使把关人/保障、培训和指导角色的可能性较小。在IMC实习期间,最常进行的监督活动是确保患者和实习生的安全,而在SC实习期间,则是确保实习生的安全以及教授技术和程序。确保适当水平的临床职责在两个实习中都是第三高的优先事项。学生的一般临床经验影响了他们对监督的认知,在实习路径后期完成SC实习的学生报告称,他们在两个实习中接受的监督水平相似。
第一次实习期间的监督经历似乎会塑造学生对后续监督的期望。提供额外支持以培养牢固的监督关系,根据新进入六年级的UGMS的特定监督需求进行量身定制,可能对supervisors和学生都有益。