Cartier Vanessa, Inan Cigdem, Zingg Walter, Delhumeau Cecile, Walder Bernard, Savoldelli Georges L
From the Division of Anaesthesiology (VCF, CI, CDC, BW, GLS); Infection Control Program, University Hospitals of Geneva and Geneva Faculty of Medicine (WZ); and UDREM (Unit for Development and Research in Medical Education), Geneva Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland (GLS).
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Aug;33(8):568-74. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000423.
Multimodal educational interventions have been shown to improve short-term competency in, and knowledge of central venous catheter (CVC) insertion.
To evaluate the effectiveness of simulation-based medical education training in improving short and long-term competency in, and knowledge of CVC insertion.
Before and after intervention study.
University Geneva Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland, between May 2008 and January 2012.
Residents in anaesthesiology aware of the Seldinger technique for vascular puncture.
Participants attended a half-day course on CVC insertion. Learning objectives included work organization, aseptic technique and prevention of CVC complications. CVC insertion competency was tested pretraining, posttraining and then more than 2 years after training (sustainability phase).
The primary study outcome was competency as measured by a global rating scale of technical skills, a hand hygiene compliance score and a checklist compliance score. Secondary outcome was knowledge as measured by a standardised pretraining and posttraining multiple-choice questionnaire. Statistical analyses were performed using paired Student's t test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Thirty-seven residents were included; 18 were tested in the sustainability phase (on average 34 months after training). The average global rating of skills was 23.4 points (±SD 4.08) before training, 32.2 (±4.51) after training (P < 0.001 for comparison with pretraining scores) and 26.5 (±5.34) in the sustainability phase (P = 0.040 for comparison with pretraining scores). The average hand hygiene compliance score was 2.8 (±1.0) points before training, 5.0 (±1.04) after training (P < 0.001 for comparison with pretraining scores) and 3.7 (±1.75) in the sustainability phase (P = 0.038 for comparison with pretraining scores). The average checklist compliance was 14.9 points (±2.3) before training, 19.9 (±1.06) after training (P < 0.001 for comparison with pretraining scores) and 17.4 (±1.41) (P = 0.002 for comparison with pretraining scores). The percentage of correct answers in the multiple-choice questionnaire increased from 76.0% (±7.9) before training to 87.7% (±4.4) after training (P < 0.001).
Simulation-based medical education training was effective in improving short and long-term competency in, and knowledge of CVC insertion.
多模式教育干预已被证明可提高中心静脉导管(CVC)插入的短期能力和知识水平。
评估基于模拟的医学教育培训在提高CVC插入的短期和长期能力及知识方面的有效性。
干预前后研究。
2008年5月至2012年1月期间,瑞士日内瓦大学医院。
了解血管穿刺塞丁格技术的麻醉科住院医师。
参与者参加了为期半天的CVC插入课程。学习目标包括工作组织、无菌技术和预防CVC并发症。在培训前、培训后以及培训后2年多(可持续性阶段)对CVC插入能力进行测试。
主要研究结果是通过技术技能的整体评分量表、手卫生依从性评分和检查表依从性评分来衡量的能力。次要结果是通过标准化的培训前和培训后多项选择题问卷来衡量的知识。使用配对学生t检验或Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行统计分析。
纳入了37名住院医师;18名在可持续性阶段接受测试(平均在培训后34个月)。培训前技能的平均整体评分为23.4分(±标准差4.08),培训后为32.2分(±4.51)(与培训前分数比较,P<0.001),在可持续性阶段为26.5分(±5.34)(与培训前分数比较,P = 0.040)。培训前手卫生依从性平均评分为2.8分(±1.0),培训后为5.0分(±1.04)(与培训前分数比较,P<0.001),在可持续性阶段为3.7分(±1.75)(与培训前分数比较,P = 0.038)。培训前检查表依从性平均为14.9分(±2.3),培训后为19.9分(±1.06)(与培训前分数比较,P<0.001),(与培训前分数比较,P = 0.002)。多项选择题问卷中的正确答案百分比从培训前的76.0%(±7.9)增加到培训后的87.7%(±4.4)(P<0.001)。
基于模拟的医学教育培训在提高CVC插入的短期和长期能力及知识方面是有效的。