Silva Maria Heloisa do Nascimento, Ciofi-Silva Caroline Lopes, de Souza Verusca Soares, Rocha Daniel de Macêdo, de Sousa Alvaro Francisco Lopes, Felix Adriana M S, Dos Santos Júnior Aires Garcia
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campus de Três Lagoas, Três Lagoas, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
School of Nursing, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Front Public Health. 2025 May 6;13:1557538. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1557538. eCollection 2025.
To compare the impact of a package of interventions on surface cleaning and disinfection in two public and private neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).
This is a quasi-experimental, quantitative study. The study consisted of three phases: baseline (phase I), implementation of the intervention package without feedback to the team (phase II), and, finally, short-term monitoring with feedback to the team (phase III). A total of 864 evaluations were carried out according to the monitoring methods: adenosine triphosphate, visual inspection, microbial load counting, and detection of Staphylococcus aureus and testing for its methicillin resistance (MRSA) in each unit over 4 months, evaluating six high-frequency touch surfaces, before and after cleaning and disinfection carried out by nursing and sanitizing professionals.
When comparing the effect of the package in the two units (public and private), no significant differences were found in the proportions of MRSA-positive surfaces in all the phases evaluated. The same occurred concerning the ATP method, which showed no significant differences between the hospitals in all study phases. Concerning the microbial count, in phase II of the study, only on one surface (scales) was a significantly lower difference found in the private hospital compared to the public one. Visual inspection indicated that the private NICU had a substantially higher proportion of surfaces with adequate hygiene in phase I: the infusion pump and the armchair; in phase II, the counter and in phase III again the counter surface. Concerning human factors, when comparing the two institutions, there were no statistically significant associations or correlations with job satisfaction. However, the public institution had higher work performance scores than the private one.
The study highlights that the rigorous implementation of intervention packages for cleaning in NICUs, even though they are different, still showed similar results in terms of effectiveness for all the methods used, except visual inspection. This study showed that even though the employees had various levels of work performance, there was still a similar effect on the outcome of the intervention package.
比较一揽子干预措施对两家公立和私立新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)表面清洁和消毒的影响。
这是一项准实验性定量研究。该研究包括三个阶段:基线期(第一阶段)、在不向团队反馈的情况下实施干预措施包(第二阶段),以及最后在向团队反馈的情况下进行短期监测(第三阶段)。根据监测方法共进行了864次评估:在4个月内,由护理和消毒专业人员对每个病房的六个高频接触表面进行清洁和消毒前后,检测三磷酸腺苷、目视检查、微生物负荷计数、金黄色葡萄球菌检测及其耐甲氧西林(MRSA)情况。
比较该措施包在两个病房(公立和私立)的效果时,在所有评估阶段,MRSA阳性表面的比例未发现显著差异。ATP方法也是如此,在所有研究阶段,各医院之间均未发现显著差异。关于微生物计数,在研究的第二阶段,仅在一个表面(秤)上,私立医院与公立医院相比差异显著更低。目视检查表明,私立NICU在第一阶段有相当高比例的表面卫生状况良好:输液泵和扶手椅;在第二阶段,是柜台;在第三阶段,又是柜台表面。关于人为因素,比较这两个机构时,与工作满意度没有统计学上的显著关联或相关性。然而,公立机构的工作绩效得分高于私立机构。
该研究强调,尽管NICU清洁干预措施包各不相同,但严格实施后,除目视检查外,所有使用方法在有效性方面仍显示出相似的结果。该研究表明,尽管员工的工作绩效水平各不相同,但对干预措施包的结果仍有类似影响。