Vasilikos Ioannis, Argiti Katerina, Joseph Kevin, Strahnen Daniel, Stathi Angeliki, Rahal Amir El, Volz Florian, Wolf Katharina, Shah Mukesch Johannes, Beck Jürgen, Urbach Horst, Lützen Niklas
Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 May 21:15910199251339537. doi: 10.1177/15910199251339537.
ObjectivesEpidural blood patch (EBP) is the current standard of care for postdural puncture headache (PDPH). However, when EBP fails to provide relief, patients may experience discomfort and functional impairments. This study reports the safety and efficacy of a novel approach that uses autologous platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) as an alternative epidural patch.MethodsSixty-seven patients with persistent PDPH symptoms after conservative medical treatment were screened. Among them, 12 (18%) patients underwent multiple EBP (range: 1-6), which failed to resolve the PDPH symptoms. As an alternative method, an epidural PRF patch (EPP) was used, in which PRF was injected percutaneously epidurally under fluoroscopic guidance. Patient symptoms were collected perioperatively, and a follow-up period of up to 6 months was conducted.ResultsThe 12 patients included showed good tolerance for the EPP procedure, with injection volumes ranging from 15 to 39 ml. Compared to EBP, patients reported a significant reduction in injection-associated pain, as measured by the unidimensional numeric rating scale, with a mean reduction of 52.8% (p ≤ 0.05). The headache impact test scores (HIT-6) obtained before and 6 months after EPP revealed a statistically significant reduction in symptoms by a mean of 33.3% (p ≤ 0.05). Moreover, no adverse effects were observed during follow up. It is noteworthy that all patients experienced significant relief from PDPH-associated symptoms 6 months after the intervention.ConclusionEPP may be a viable solution for patients with persistent PDPH symptoms. Notably, the discomfort experienced due to pain during the EPP procedure was markedly less than that experienced during the EBP procedure. The fact that clinical improvement was observed after 6 months is encouraging and lays the groundwork for additional clinical investigations.
目的
硬膜外血贴(EBP)是目前治疗硬膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)的标准护理方法。然而,当EBP未能缓解症状时,患者可能会出现不适和功能障碍。本研究报告了一种使用自体富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)作为替代硬膜外贴片的新方法的安全性和有效性。
方法
筛选出67例经保守药物治疗后仍有持续性PDPH症状的患者。其中,12例(18%)患者接受了多次EBP(范围:1 - 6次),但PDPH症状仍未缓解。作为替代方法,采用了硬膜外PRF贴片(EPP),即在透视引导下经皮硬膜外注射PRF。在围手术期收集患者症状,并进行长达6个月的随访。
结果
纳入的12例患者对EPP手术耐受性良好,注射量为15至39毫升。与EBP相比,患者报告的注射相关疼痛显著减轻,通过单维度数字评分量表测量,平均减轻52.8%(p≤0.05)。EPP术前和术后6个月获得的头痛影响测试评分(HIT - 6)显示,症状平均显著减轻33.3%(p≤0.05)。此外,随访期间未观察到不良反应。值得注意的是,所有患者在干预后6个月PDPH相关症状均得到显著缓解。
结论
EPP可能是治疗持续性PDPH症状患者的可行解决方案。值得注意的是,EPP手术过程中因疼痛而产生的不适明显少于EBP手术过程中所经历的不适。6个月后观察到临床改善这一事实令人鼓舞,并为进一步的临床研究奠定了基础。