Taffe Brianna D, Petermann Victoria, Biru Blen M, Albright Benjamin B, Wheeler Stephanie B, Bae-Jump Victoria L, Leeman Jennifer, Lanneau Grainger, Spees Lisa P
Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
School of Nursing, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Support Care Cancer. 2025 May 21;33(6):490. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09533-3.
While it is established that rural cancer patients face multi-level barriers to high-quality treatment, the interconnections between these barriers and how they drive rural cancer disparities is not well-understood. Therefore, our objective was to better understand the interconnections between barriers to high-quality treatment faced by rural endometrial cancer (EC) patients.
We conducted semi-structured interviews with 32 clinicians and healthcare personnel from three large, geographically diverse, rural-serving, integrated healthcare systems in North Carolina. A semi-structured interview guide was developed to examine barriers to high-quality treatment for rural EC patients. Initial codes were derived from a multi-level conceptual framework of rural cancer control, and transcribed interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.
We identified three domains of interconnected barriers. First, travel distance, the most frequently noted barrier, amplified financial barriers and caregiver burden. While gynecologic oncologists could reduce travel burden by referring patients to nearby treatment facilities, provider participants expressed mixed opinions regarding the quality of care received at local facilities. Second, limited health literacy among rural patients often led to challenges in patient-provider communication, including challenges with care-related decision making and comprehension of diagnosis and treatment goals. Finally, supportive care and financial resources were often concentrated at large, urban facilities and not accessible to rural patients. However, even these large facilities lack established systems or standardized processes for supporting the most vulnerable patients.
To achieve equitable access to care and outcomes among EC patients, those living in rural areas may require more targeted, intensive outreach, support, and resources.
虽然农村癌症患者在获得高质量治疗方面面临多层次障碍,但这些障碍之间的相互联系以及它们如何导致农村癌症差异尚不清楚。因此,我们的目标是更好地理解农村子宫内膜癌(EC)患者在获得高质量治疗方面所面临障碍之间的相互联系。
我们对来自北卡罗来纳州三个地理上不同、服务农村的大型综合医疗系统的32名临床医生和医护人员进行了半结构化访谈。制定了一个半结构化访谈指南,以研究农村EC患者获得高质量治疗的障碍。初始编码源自农村癌症控制的多层次概念框架,并使用主题分析对转录的访谈进行分析。
我们确定了相互关联的障碍的三个领域。首先,出行距离是最常提到的障碍,它加剧了经济障碍和照顾者负担。虽然妇科肿瘤学家可以通过将患者转诊到附近的治疗机构来减轻出行负担,但提供者参与者对当地机构提供的护理质量看法不一。其次,农村患者健康素养有限往往导致医患沟通方面的挑战,包括与护理相关决策以及对诊断和治疗目标理解方面的挑战。最后,支持性护理和资金资源往往集中在大型城市机构,农村患者无法获得。然而,即使是这些大型机构也缺乏支持最脆弱患者的既定系统或标准化流程。
为了使EC患者能够公平地获得护理和治疗结果,农村地区的患者可能需要更有针对性、更密集的外展服务、支持和资源。