Suppr超能文献

风险和不确定性下的医疗决策:麻醉医生关于进行手术的决策

Medical decision-making under risk and uncertainty: Anesthetists' decision to proceed with surgery.

作者信息

Yang Zijing, Hanoch Yaniv, Safra Zvi, Melkonyan Tigran, Potparic Olivera, Palmer James

机构信息

Behavioural Science Group, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, England, UK.

Interdisciplinary Centre for Social Sciences (ICSS), Zhejiang University, China.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2025 Sep;45(9):2771-2789. doi: 10.1111/risa.70027. Epub 2025 May 21.

Abstract

There is a paucity of work examining anesthetists' willingness to proceed as attending anesthetists (hereafter, WTP) in response to different risky medical conditions. Earlier studies offer only a partial and indirect explanation as to why variations in WTP exist. We evaluated whether psychological factors of risk-taking tendencies, attitudes toward uncertainty, sense of regret, and demographic variables, particularly experience and gender, might clarify the disparities in an anesthetist's WTP. Anesthetists from two National Health Service Trusts in England (i.e., hospitals) viewed, in random order, three different realistic scenarios (representing low-, medium-, and high-risk cases) and were asked to indicate how likely they were to agree to proceed as the attending anesthetist. They also answered questions evaluating their risk-taking tendencies, comfort with uncertainty, and tendency to experience regret. Anesthetists varied in their WTP. Importantly, our data revealed that a sense of uncertainty and regret, but not a risk attitude, could help explain these variations. Female anesthetists were less likely to agree to proceed as attending anesthetists regardless of the level of risk or individual differences, but we found no relationship between levels of experience and WTP. Examining anesthetists' WTP in isolation provides an important but only partial picture. Gaining a better understanding of the factors that drive decision-making is vital for improving both training and practice. In particular, given the high proportion of women in anesthesia, the gender difference found in this study has important implications for anesthetic training and practice.

摘要

针对不同的高风险医疗状况,研究麻醉医师作为主麻医师继续开展工作意愿(以下简称WTP)的相关研究较少。早期研究仅对WTP存在差异的原因提供了部分间接解释。我们评估了冒险倾向、对不确定性的态度、后悔感等心理因素以及人口统计学变量,尤其是经验和性别,是否能够解释麻醉医师WTP的差异。来自英国两个国民健康服务信托机构(即医院)的麻醉医师随机观看三种不同的真实场景(分别代表低、中、高风险病例),并被要求表明他们同意作为主麻医师继续开展工作的可能性。他们还回答了评估其冒险倾向、对不确定性的接受程度以及后悔倾向的问题。麻醉医师的WTP各不相同。重要的是,我们的数据显示,不确定性和后悔感而非风险态度能够解释这些差异。无论风险水平或个体差异如何,女性麻醉医师同意作为主麻医师继续开展工作的可能性较低,但我们发现经验水平与WTP之间没有关系。单独研究麻醉医师的WTP提供了一个重要但不完整的情况。更好地理解驱动决策的因素对于改进培训和实践至关重要。特别是,鉴于麻醉领域女性比例较高,本研究中发现的性别差异对麻醉培训和实践具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/778d/12474527/c492175c1371/RISA-45-2771-g004.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验