• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索情绪:情绪刺激与参与者的特质焦虑塑造视觉探索行为。

Foraging through emotions: emotional stimuli and participants' trait anxiety shape visual foraging.

作者信息

Tagu Jérôme, Robert Christelle, Mathey Stéphanie

机构信息

Univ. Bordeaux, LabPsy, UR 4139, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2025 May 21;12(5):242175. doi: 10.1098/rsos.242175. eCollection 2025 May.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.242175
PMID:40400528
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12092124/
Abstract

Previous work suggests that target selection during visual foraging is achieved through competition between different factors (e.g. proximity, priming, value) that orient attention towards one of the possible targets. However, this research has mainly involved simple stimuli such as coloured dots. Here, we investigated whether target selection is sensitive to the emotional content of the stimuli during visual foraging, using real-world photographs eliciting negative, neutral or positive emotions. Moreover, based on results from single-target visual search, we examined how participants' trait anxiety influences foraging behaviour. Seventy-five observers completed three foraging tasks corresponding to three emotional-valence conditions (positive, neutral, negative). The task was to select all the targets (pre-specified emotional images) as fast as possible while ignoring neutral distractors. Observers' foraging strategy (i.e. selection order, number of switches between target types) and performance (i.e. selection times, number of distractor selections) were measured. We also assessed participants' trait anxiety. The results revealed that negative emotional stimuli significantly influenced both foraging strategy and performance. Furthermore, the effect of negative emotion on foraging performance was amplified for participants with high trait anxiety. These findings suggest that emotional characteristics of both targets and participants contribute to target selection during visual foraging.

摘要

先前的研究表明,视觉觅食过程中的目标选择是通过不同因素(如接近度、启动效应、价值)之间的竞争实现的,这些因素会将注意力导向其中一个可能的目标。然而,这项研究主要涉及彩色点等简单刺激。在这里,我们使用引发负面、中性或正面情绪的真实世界照片,研究了视觉觅食过程中目标选择是否对刺激的情感内容敏感。此外,基于单目标视觉搜索的结果,我们考察了参与者的特质焦虑如何影响觅食行为。75名观察者完成了与三种情绪效价条件(积极、中性、消极)相对应的三项觅食任务。任务是尽快选择所有目标(预先指定的情感图像),同时忽略中性干扰项。测量了观察者的觅食策略(即选择顺序、目标类型之间的切换次数)和表现(即选择时间、干扰项选择次数)。我们还评估了参与者的特质焦虑。结果显示,负面情绪刺激显著影响了觅食策略和表现。此外,对于特质焦虑程度高的参与者,负面情绪对觅食表现的影响会放大。这些发现表明,目标和参与者的情感特征都有助于视觉觅食过程中的目标选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64c/12092124/a584ad9377c0/rsos.242175.f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64c/12092124/b4796e2cce30/rsos.242175.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64c/12092124/7ebe4cb8dc73/rsos.242175.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64c/12092124/d9bfc04ac715/rsos.242175.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64c/12092124/a584ad9377c0/rsos.242175.f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64c/12092124/b4796e2cce30/rsos.242175.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64c/12092124/7ebe4cb8dc73/rsos.242175.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64c/12092124/d9bfc04ac715/rsos.242175.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b64c/12092124/a584ad9377c0/rsos.242175.f004.jpg

相似文献

1
Foraging through emotions: emotional stimuli and participants' trait anxiety shape visual foraging.探索情绪:情绪刺激与参与者的特质焦虑塑造视觉探索行为。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 May 21;12(5):242175. doi: 10.1098/rsos.242175. eCollection 2025 May.
2
The selection balance: Contrasting value, proximity and priming in a multitarget foraging task.选择平衡:多目标觅食任务中的对比价值、接近度和启动效应。
Cognition. 2022 Jan;218:104935. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104935. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
3
The impact of positive, negative and neutral stimuli in a virtual reality cognitive-motor rehabilitation task: a pilot study with stroke patients.虚拟现实认知运动康复任务中阳性、阴性和中性刺激的影响:一项针对中风患者的初步研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 Aug 9;13(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0175-0.
4
Emotional real-world scenes impact visual search.现实世界中的情感场景会影响视觉搜索。
Cogn Process. 2019 Aug;20(3):309-316. doi: 10.1007/s10339-018-0898-x. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
5
Manipulations of distractor frequency do not mitigate emotion-induced blindness.干扰频率的操作并不能减轻情绪诱导的盲视。
Cogn Emot. 2019 May;33(3):442-451. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1459490. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
6
The influence of stimuli valence, extraversion, and emotion regulation on visual search within real-world scenes.刺激效价、外向性和情绪调节对现实场景中视觉搜索的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 18;12(1):948. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-04964-y.
7
Dynamics of visual attention revealed in foraging tasks.视觉注意力在觅食任务中的动态变化。
Cognition. 2020 Jan;194:104032. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104032. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
8
Trait Anxiety Influences Negative Affect-modulated Distribution of Visuospatial Attention.特质焦虑影响负性情绪调节的视觉空间注意分配。
Neuroscience. 2023 Jan 15;509:145-156. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2022.11.034. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
9
The influence of children's self-report trait anxiety and depression on visual search for emotional faces.儿童自我报告的特质焦虑和抑郁对情绪面孔视觉搜索的影响。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2003 Mar;44(3):432-44. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00133.
10
Moving foraging into three dimensions: Feature- versus conjunction-based foraging in virtual reality.从二维到三维:虚拟现实中基于特征与联合的觅食。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Feb;75(2):313-327. doi: 10.1177/1747021820937020. Epub 2020 Jul 11.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of target scarcity on visual foraging.目标稀缺对视觉觅食的影响。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Dec 4;11(12):240060. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240060. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Individual differences in visual search: A systematic review of the link between visual search performance and traits or abilities.个体视觉搜索差异:视觉搜索表现与特质或能力关系的系统综述。
Cortex. 2024 Sep;178:51-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.05.020. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
3
The effect of emotional arousal on visual attentional performance: a systematic review.
情绪唤醒对视觉注意力表现的影响:系统综述。
Psychol Res. 2024 Feb;88(1):1-24. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01852-6. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
4
Five Factors that Guide Attention in Visual Search.视觉搜索中引导注意力的五个因素。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Mar;1(3). doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0058. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
5
Foraging as sampling without replacement: A Bayesian statistical model for estimating biases in target selection.无替换采样觅食:一种用于估计目标选择偏差的贝叶斯统计模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Jan 24;18(1):e1009813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009813. eCollection 2022 Jan.
6
The selection balance: Contrasting value, proximity and priming in a multitarget foraging task.选择平衡:多目标觅食任务中的对比价值、接近度和启动效应。
Cognition. 2022 Jan;218:104935. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104935. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
7
The Predation Game: Does dividing attention affect patterns of human foraging?捕食游戏:分散注意力是否会影响人类觅食模式?
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 May 6;6(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00299-w.
8
Foraging behavior in visual search: A review of theoretical and mathematical models in humans and animals.视觉搜索中的觅食行为:人类和动物的理论与数学模型综述。
Psychol Res. 2022 Mar;86(2):331-349. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01499-1. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
9
Eating disorder symptoms and foraging for food related items.饮食失调症状与搜寻食物相关物品。
J Eat Disord. 2021 Feb 10;9(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40337-021-00373-0.
10
Foraging tempo: Human run patterns in multiple-target search are constrained by the rate of successive responses.觅食节奏:在多目标搜索中,人类的奔跑模式受到连续反应率的限制。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Feb;75(2):297-312. doi: 10.1177/1747021820961640. Epub 2020 Oct 8.