• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

目标稀缺对视觉觅食的影响。

The effect of target scarcity on visual foraging.

作者信息

Hughes A E, Statham H R, Clarke A D F

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.

School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Dec 4;11(12):240060. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240060. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.240060
PMID:39635148
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11614524/
Abstract

Previous studies have investigated the effect of target prevalence in combination with the effect of explicit target value on human visual foraging strategies, though the conclusions have been mixed. Some find that individuals have a bias towards high-value targets even when these targets are scarcer, while other studies find that this bias disappears when those targets are scarcer. In this study, we tested for a bias for scarce targets using standard feature versus conjunction visual foraging tasks, without an explicit value being given. Based on the idea of commodity theory and implicit value, we hypothesized that participants would show a scarcity bias. The bias was investigated using a Bayesian statistical model which has been developed for predicting target-by-target foraging behaviours. However, we found no evidence of a scarcity bias in our experiment, suggesting that participants did not inherently find rarer targets more rewarding.

摘要

以往的研究探讨了目标患病率与明确目标值对人类视觉觅食策略的综合影响,尽管结论不一。一些研究发现,即使高价值目标较为稀少,个体仍对其存在偏好,而其他研究则发现,当这些目标更为稀少时,这种偏好就会消失。在本研究中,我们使用标准特征与联合视觉觅食任务,在未给出明确价值的情况下,测试了对稀少目标的偏好。基于商品理论和隐性价值的概念,我们假设参与者会表现出稀缺偏好。我们使用一种为预测逐个目标的觅食行为而开发的贝叶斯统计模型来研究这种偏好。然而,我们在实验中未发现稀缺偏好的证据,这表明参与者并非天生就觉得更稀少的目标更有价值。

相似文献

1
The effect of target scarcity on visual foraging.目标稀缺对视觉觅食的影响。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Dec 4;11(12):240060. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240060. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Bayesian approximations to the theory of visual attention (TVA) in a foraging task.贝叶斯方法在觅食任务中对视觉注意理论(TVA)的逼近。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Mar;76(3):497-510. doi: 10.1177/17470218221094572. Epub 2022 May 19.
3
The time course of visual foraging in the lifespan: Spatial scanning, organization search, and target processing.一生中视觉搜索的时间进程:空间扫描、组织搜索和目标处理。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Feb;31(1):325-339. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02345-8. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
4
Dynamics of visual attention revealed in foraging tasks.视觉注意力在觅食任务中的动态变化。
Cognition. 2020 Jan;194:104032. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104032. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
5
Moving foraging into three dimensions: Feature- versus conjunction-based foraging in virtual reality.从二维到三维:虚拟现实中基于特征与联合的觅食。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Feb;75(2):313-327. doi: 10.1177/1747021820937020. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
6
Foraging as sampling without replacement: A Bayesian statistical model for estimating biases in target selection.无替换采样觅食:一种用于估计目标选择偏差的贝叶斯统计模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Jan 24;18(1):e1009813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009813. eCollection 2022 Jan.
7
Dynamics of attentional and oculomotor orienting in visual foraging tasks.视觉觅食任务中注意力和眼动定向的动力学。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Feb;75(2):260-276. doi: 10.1177/1747021820919351. Epub 2020 May 24.
8
Foraging tempo: Human run patterns in multiple-target search are constrained by the rate of successive responses.觅食节奏:在多目标搜索中,人类的奔跑模式受到连续反应率的限制。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Feb;75(2):297-312. doi: 10.1177/1747021820961640. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
9
The development of foraging organization.觅食组织的发展。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Oct;83(7):2891-2904. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02328-8. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
10
A Bayesian Statistical Model Is Able to Predict Target-by-Target Selection Behaviour in a Human Foraging Task.贝叶斯统计模型能够预测人类觅食任务中逐个目标的选择行为。
Vision (Basel). 2022 Nov 11;6(4):66. doi: 10.3390/vision6040066.

引用本文的文献

1
Foraging through emotions: emotional stimuli and participants' trait anxiety shape visual foraging.探索情绪:情绪刺激与参与者的特质焦虑塑造视觉探索行为。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 May 21;12(5):242175. doi: 10.1098/rsos.242175. eCollection 2025 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Five Factors that Guide Attention in Visual Search.视觉搜索中引导注意力的五个因素。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Mar;1(3). doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0058. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
2
A Bayesian Statistical Model Is Able to Predict Target-by-Target Selection Behaviour in a Human Foraging Task.贝叶斯统计模型能够预测人类觅食任务中逐个目标的选择行为。
Vision (Basel). 2022 Nov 11;6(4):66. doi: 10.3390/vision6040066.
3
Foraging complexity and the evolution of childhood.觅食复杂性与童年的演化
Sci Adv. 2022 Oct 14;8(41):eabn9889. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abn9889. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
4
Foraging as sampling without replacement: A Bayesian statistical model for estimating biases in target selection.无替换采样觅食:一种用于估计目标选择偏差的贝叶斯统计模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Jan 24;18(1):e1009813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009813. eCollection 2022 Jan.
5
The selection balance: Contrasting value, proximity and priming in a multitarget foraging task.选择平衡:多目标觅食任务中的对比价值、接近度和启动效应。
Cognition. 2022 Jan;218:104935. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104935. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
6
Target value and prevalence influence visual foraging in younger and older age.目标值和流行率影响年轻和老年的视觉觅食。
Vision Res. 2021 Sep;186:87-102. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 29.
7
Foraging behavior in visual search: A review of theoretical and mathematical models in humans and animals.视觉搜索中的觅食行为:人类和动物的理论与数学模型综述。
Psychol Res. 2022 Mar;86(2):331-349. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01499-1. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
8
Different effects of reward value and saliency during bumblebee visual search for multiple rewarding targets.在大黄蜂对多个奖励目标进行视觉搜索时,奖励价值和显著性的不同影响。
Anim Cogn. 2021 Jul;24(4):803-814. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01479-3. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
9
Stable individual differences in strategies within, but not between, visual search tasks.在视觉搜索任务内,但不在任务间,个体策略存在稳定的差异。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Feb;75(2):289-296. doi: 10.1177/1747021820929190. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
10
Guidance and selection history in hybrid foraging visual search.混合觅食视觉搜索中的引导与选择历史
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Apr;81(3):637-653. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-01649-5.