• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险评估中的急性刺激试验。

Acute irritation tests in risk assessment.

作者信息

Schlatter C, Reinhardt C A

出版信息

Food Chem Toxicol. 1985 Feb;23(2):145-8. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(85)90006-7.

DOI:10.1016/0278-6915(85)90006-7
PMID:4040056
Abstract

The two most important elements in assessing the risk of topical injury from a chemical are its biological properties, in the context of skin and mucous membrane damage, and the likelihood and likely nature of topical contact with the chemical. Appropriate biological tests in model systems should be based on the probable circumstances of exposure. Topical contact takes place under two distinct sets of circumstances--intentional and accidental. Chemicals that are intended to come into contact with skin and mucous membranes include cosmetics and dermatological preparations. For such compounds the frequency and extent of skin contact is predictable and any irritant effects are unacceptable. The absence of irritant effects is established by testing in human volunteers or experimental animals. Since animal skin and mucous membranes are more susceptible to irritants than those of man, the amounts or concentrations tested need not be greater than those intended for human use. It is hoped that validated alternatives to animal models will soon be available. For household or industrial chemicals where skin and/or mucous-membrane contact occurs accidentally, topical contact should generally be avoided. In such cases the objective of irritancy testing should be to establish which compounds are particularly irritant and therefore need extra care in handling. We are convinced that this latter objective can be achieved by simpler and less cruel tests than the Draize eye-irritation test.

摘要

评估化学品造成局部损伤风险的两个最重要因素,一是在皮肤和黏膜损伤方面的生物学特性,二是与该化学品发生局部接触的可能性及可能的接触方式。模型系统中的适当生物学测试应基于可能的暴露情况。局部接触发生在两种不同情况下——有意接触和意外接触。旨在与皮肤和黏膜接触的化学品包括化妆品和皮肤科制剂。对于这类化合物,皮肤接触的频率和程度是可预测的,任何刺激作用都是不可接受的。通过在人类志愿者或实验动物身上进行测试来确定是否不存在刺激作用。由于动物的皮肤和黏膜比人类的更容易受到刺激物影响,测试所用的量或浓度不必高于拟用于人类的量或浓度。希望很快能有经过验证的动物模型替代方法。对于家庭或工业化学品,若意外发生皮肤和/或黏膜接触,通常应避免局部接触。在这种情况下,刺激性测试的目的应是确定哪些化合物具有特别强的刺激性,因此在处理时需要格外小心。我们相信,通过比德莱兹眼刺激试验更简单、更人道的测试就能实现后一个目标。

相似文献

1
Acute irritation tests in risk assessment.风险评估中的急性刺激试验。
Food Chem Toxicol. 1985 Feb;23(2):145-8. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(85)90006-7.
2
Cosmetics Europe compilation of historical serious eye damage/eye irritation in vivo data analysed by drivers of classification to support the selection of chemicals for development and evaluation of alternative methods/strategies: the Draize eye test Reference Database (DRD).欧洲化妆品协会对历史上严重眼损伤/眼刺激体内数据的汇编,这些数据按分类驱动因素进行分析,以支持化学品开发及替代方法/策略评估的化学品选择:德莱兹眼试验参考数据库(DRD)
Arch Toxicol. 2017 Feb;91(2):521-547. doi: 10.1007/s00204-016-1679-x. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
3
[Irritant contact dermatitis. Part II. Evaluation evaluation of skin irritation potential of chemicals].[刺激性接触性皮炎。第二部分。化学物质皮肤刺激潜力的评估]
Med Pr. 2009;60(3):209-14.
4
Review on skin and mucous-membrane irritation tests and their application.皮肤和黏膜刺激试验及其应用综述
Food Chem Toxicol. 1985 Feb;23(2):149-54. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(85)90007-9.
5
The use of HET-CAM test in detecting the ocular irritation.鸡胚绒毛尿囊膜试验在检测眼部刺激性中的应用。
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2007;72(2):137-41.
6
Human hemoglobin denaturation as an alternative to the Draize test for predicting eye irritancy of surfactants.作为预测表面活性剂眼刺激性的替代方法,人体血红蛋白变性替代兔眼刺激试验。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Nov;52(2):89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.06.005. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
7
Evaluation of a tiered in vitro testing strategy for assessing the ocular and dermal irritation/corrosion potential of pharmaceutical compounds for worker safety.评估一种分层体外测试策略,以评估用于工人安全的药物化合物的眼和皮肤刺激/腐蚀潜力。
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2018 Dec;37(4):380-390. doi: 10.1080/15569527.2018.1483944. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
8
Estimation of the chemical-induced eye injury using a weight-of-evidence (WoE) battery of 21 artificial neural network (ANN) c-QSAR models (QSAR-21): part I: irritation potential.使用由21个人工神经网络(ANN)化学定量构效关系(c-QSAR)模型组成的证据权重(WoE)组(QSAR-21)评估化学物质引起的眼损伤:第一部分:刺激潜力。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Mar;71(2):318-30. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.11.011. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
9
Assessment of an ex vivo irritation test performed on human skin explants and comparison of its results with those of a 24-/48-h human patch test for the evaluation of cosmetics.评估在人体皮肤标本上进行的体外刺激性试验,并将其结果与 24/48 小时人体斑贴试验评估化妆品的结果进行比较。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2021 Feb;70:105030. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2020.105030. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
10
The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: selection of test chemicals.欧洲替代方法验证中心(ECVAM)关于急性皮肤刺激性体外试验的国际验证研究:试验化学品的选择
Altern Lab Anim. 2007 Dec;35(6):603-19. doi: 10.1177/026119290703500608.