Andrade Chittaranjan
Dept. of Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neurotoxicology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Indian J Psychol Med. 2025 May 19;47(4):408-409. doi: 10.1177/02537176251343289. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Immortal time bias is one of many types of bias that may flaw cohort studies. This bias occurs when formal observation of patients starts before they experience the exposure of interest, and when, by design, those who experience the outcome of interest before they experience the exposure are ineligible to be included in the exposure arm of the study. Consequently, patients in the exposure arm, by design, are immortal to the outcome between the start of observation and point of the exposure. If this period of immortality is included in analysis, the result is immortal time bias. This concept is explained with one hypothetical example, related to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor exposure and prevention of ischemic heart disease events, and one published example, related to the use of suvorexant to prevent delirium during intensive care unit admission. Also explained is how immortal time bias can be avoided, and why an awareness of the concept is important when reading studies that employ observational designs.
永生时间偏倚是可能使队列研究出现缺陷的多种偏倚类型之一。当对患者的正式观察在他们经历感兴趣的暴露之前就开始,并且按照设计,那些在经历暴露之前就经历了感兴趣结局的患者没有资格被纳入研究的暴露组时,就会出现这种偏倚。因此,按照设计,暴露组的患者在观察开始到暴露点之间对该结局是“永生”的。如果将这段永生时间纳入分析,结果就会出现永生时间偏倚。用一个与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂暴露和预防缺血性心脏病事件相关的假设例子以及一个与使用苏沃雷生预防重症监护病房入院期间谵妄相关的已发表例子来解释这一概念。还解释了如何避免永生时间偏倚,以及为什么在阅读采用观察性设计的研究时了解这一概念很重要。