Iannuzzi Valentina, Giuberti Virginia, Formisano Debora, Poletti Michele
Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service, Department of Mental Health and Pathological Addiction, Azienda USL-IRCCS or Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Autism Center, Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service, Department of Mental Health and Pathological Addiction, Azienda USL-IRCCS or Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2025 Apr;22(2):121-124. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20250202.
The diagnosis of autism is considered more longitudinally stable compared to other diagnoses for children and adolescents, although significant heterogeneity in longitudinal outcomes emerges between studies based on temporal intervals and diagnostic instruments. The introduction of the concept of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) by DSM-5 may have impacted diagnostic stability. The current study aimed to investigate the longitudinal diagnostic stability of different diagnoses of autism according to the ICD-10 diagnostic system before the institutional move towards the utilization of a unique ASD diagnosis according to DSM-5.
A retrospective study based on medical records and the ELEA electronic database was performed on children attending the Autism Center of the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service of the Azienda USL-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy, from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2015. Diagnostic stability was evaluated according to the diagnosis at follow-up, which was set at 10 years from baseline or December 31, 2020.
A total of 380 children were included at baseline, and 341 were included at follow-up (with a mean temporal interval of 8.74 ± 2.7 years). Among them, 251 individuals maintained a diagnosis within the F84 spectrum, resulting in a diagnostic stability of 73.6%. Specifically, diagnostic stability was 79.8% for the F84.0 diagnosis and 68.2% for the F84.9 diagnosis.
Before the adoption of DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for ASD, ICD-10 diagnoses related to autism were relatively stable in the long run, with an 8-year follow-up. The next step is to assess the longitudinal diagnostic stability of ASD after the adoption of DSM-5 criteria.
与儿童和青少年的其他诊断相比,自闭症的诊断在纵向方面被认为更具稳定性,尽管基于时间间隔和诊断工具的研究之间纵向结果存在显著异质性。《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM-5)引入的自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)概念可能影响了诊断稳定性。本研究旨在调查在机构转向使用根据DSM-5的单一ASD诊断之前,根据国际疾病分类第10版(ICD-10)诊断系统对不同自闭症诊断的纵向诊断稳定性。
对2005年1月1日至2015年12月31日期间在意大利雷焦艾米利亚USL-IRCCS儿童和青少年心理健康服务自闭症中心就诊的儿童进行了一项基于病历和ELEA电子数据库的回顾性研究。根据随访时的诊断评估诊断稳定性,随访设定为距基线10年或至2020年12月31日。
基线时共纳入380名儿童,随访时纳入341名(平均时间间隔为8.74±2.7年)。其中,251人维持在F84谱系内的诊断,诊断稳定性为73.6%。具体而言,F84.0诊断的稳定性为79.8%,F84.9诊断的稳定性为68.2%。
在采用DSM-5的ASD诊断标准之前,与自闭症相关的ICD-10诊断在长达8年的随访中相对稳定。下一步是评估采用DSM-5标准后ASD的纵向诊断稳定性。