Hsu Tien-Wei, Chang Wen-Han, Cheng Chih-Ming, Tsai Shih-Jen, Bai Ya-Mei, Hsu Ju-Wei, Huang Kai-Lin, Chen Tzeng-Ji, Liang Chih-Sung, Chen Mu-Hong
Department of Psychiatry, E-DA Dachang Hospital, I-Shou Universitiy, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Department of Psychiatry, E-DA Hospital, I-Shou Universitiy, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2025 Jun;55(3):e70023. doi: 10.1111/sltb.70023.
Few studies investigate cause-specific mortality in individuals with tic disorders. We aimed to examine all-cause, natural-cause, and unnatural-cause mortality in individuals with tic disorders.
Using the nationwide database of Taiwan from 2003 to 2017, we identified 50,018 patients with tic disorders and, using a ratio of 1:4, matched unaffected controls based on birth year and sex. Cause-specific mortality (i.e., natural cause, accident, and suicide mortality) and all-cause mortality were assessed between the two cohorts using time-dependent Cox regression models.
After adjusting for demographics, individuals with tic disorders had increased likelihoods (reported as adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] with 95% confidence interval [CI]) of all-cause (1.14, 1.03-1.26), unnatural-cause (including accidents and suicides; 1.78, 1.43-2.23), and suicide mortality (3.09, 2.07-4.59) compared to controls. With additional adjustments for psychiatric comorbidities, the likelihood of all-cause, unnatural-cause, and suicide mortality remained significant. However, we did not find a higher natural cause mortality in patients with tic disorders compared to controls (1.02, 0.91-1.15).
Individuals with tic disorders have a higher likelihood of unnatural causes and suicide mortality after adjusting for demographics, clinical characteristics, and psychiatric comorbidities. Our findings suggest that clinicians should routinely monitor both the physical and mental conditions of patients with tic disorders.
很少有研究调查抽动障碍患者的特定病因死亡率。我们旨在研究抽动障碍患者的全因死亡率、自然病因死亡率和非自然病因死亡率。
利用2003年至2017年台湾地区的全国性数据库,我们识别出50018例抽动障碍患者,并按照1:4的比例,根据出生年份和性别匹配未患病的对照者。使用时间依赖性Cox回归模型评估两组人群的特定病因死亡率(即自然病因、意外事故和自杀死亡率)和全因死亡率。
在对人口统计学因素进行调整后,与对照组相比,抽动障碍患者的全因死亡率(报告为调整后风险比[aHR]及95%置信区间[CI])升高(1.14,1.03 - 1.26),非自然病因死亡率(包括意外事故和自杀;1.78,1.43 - 2.23)以及自杀死亡率(3.09,2.07 - 4.59)也升高。在对精神疾病共病情况进行额外调整后,全因、非自然病因和自杀死亡率的可能性仍然显著。然而,与对照组相比,我们未发现抽动障碍患者的自然病因死亡率更高(1.02,0.91 - 1.15)。
在对人口统计学因素、临床特征和精神疾病共病情况进行调整后,抽动障碍患者出现非自然病因和自杀死亡的可能性更高。我们的研究结果表明,临床医生应常规监测抽动障碍患者的身体和精神状况。