Suppr超能文献

一次性使用和可重复使用的柔性视频喉镜的环境影响

Environmental Impact of Flexible Single-Use and Reusable Video Laryngoscopes.

作者信息

Pasick Luke J, Langlie Jake, Krishnan Pavan S, Bowers Eve R, Rosow David E

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Miami-Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.

出版信息

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2025 Sep;134(9):633-638. doi: 10.1177/00034894251341111. Epub 2025 May 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the environmental impact of single-use and reusable video laryngoscopes.

METHODS

We performed life-cycle assessments of video laryngoscopes at a tertiary-care academic center: single-use Ambu aScope 4 RhinoLaryngo Slim (Ambu Inc., Columbia, MD), single-use Video Rhino-Laryngoscope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany), and reusable Storz Video Rhinolaryngoscope 1101HD. We collected data regarding lifecycle, manual reprocessing, and waste disposal at our institution. The lifetime carbon footprint of each device was calculated and included emissions related to manufacturing, transportation, sterilization, repair, and disposal. We then assessed carbon footprint of each device per procedure.

RESULTS

The total estimated carbon footprint per procedure for single-use Ambu and Storz laryngoscopes is 7.46 and 5.49 kg CO, respectively. The mass of solid waste of single-use laryngoscopes and packaging contribute to carbon emissions of 0.173 and 0.40 kg CO for Ambu and Storz laryngoscopes, respectively. Reusable laryngoscopes are estimated to have a carbon footprint of 0.1137 kg CO per procedure at our institution. The greatest contributions to carbon footprint during reusable laryngoscope manual reprocessing include personal protective equipment solid waste and electrical energy (0.0859 and 0.016 kg CO, respectively). The carbon footprint of single-use laryngoscopes is estimated to range from 1.5-fold (based on solid waste alone) up to 66-fold greater than traditional reusable laryngoscopes, although the use of water and chemicals for reprocessing must also be considered.

DISCUSSION

While single-use laryngoscopes have benefits of added convenience, cost effectiveness, and ease of use, they have a significantly greater environmental impact than resusable laryngoscopes. Otolaryngologists should consider the environmental impact of single-use laryngoscopes with goals of improving carbon footprint reduction.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估和比较一次性和可重复使用视频喉镜对环境的影响。

方法

我们在一家三级医疗学术中心对视频喉镜进行了生命周期评估:一次性使用的Ambu aScope 4 RhinoLaryngo Slim(Ambu公司,马里兰州哥伦比亚)、一次性使用的视频鼻咽喉镜(卡尔史托斯公司,德国图特林根)以及可重复使用的史托斯视频鼻咽喉镜1101HD。我们收集了有关本机构内生命周期、手动再处理和废物处理的数据。计算了每个设备的终身碳足迹,包括与制造、运输、消毒、维修和处置相关的排放。然后我们评估了每个设备每次操作的碳足迹。

结果

一次性使用的Ambu和史托斯喉镜每次操作的估计总碳足迹分别为7.46和5.49千克二氧化碳。一次性喉镜及其包装的固体废物质量分别导致Ambu和史托斯喉镜的碳排放为0.173和0.40千克二氧化碳。据估计,在我们机构,可重复使用喉镜每次操作的碳足迹为0.1137千克二氧化碳。可重复使用喉镜手动再处理过程中对碳足迹贡献最大的部分包括个人防护设备固体废物和电能(分别为0.0859和0.016千克二氧化碳)。一次性喉镜的碳足迹估计比传统可重复使用喉镜大1.5倍(仅基于固体废物)至66倍,不过还必须考虑再处理过程中使用的水和化学物质。

讨论

虽然一次性喉镜具有增加便利性、成本效益和易用性等优点,但它们对环境的影响比可重复使用喉镜大得多。耳鼻喉科医生应考虑一次性喉镜对环境的影响,以实现减少碳足迹的目标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验