Li Meng-Yuan, Liu Xian-Liang, Peng Bo, Wang Tao, Yao Li-Qun, Huang Hou-Qiang, Kwok Wai Hang, Tan Jing-Yu Benjamin, Molassiotis Alex
School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Southern Queensland, Ipswich, QLD, Australia.
School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Support Care Cancer. 2025 May 22;33(6):492. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09511-9.
To assess the effects of resistance inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on breathlessness in patients with thoracic malignancies.
This is a two-arm, non-blinded, randomised controlled trial (RCT). A total of 196 participants were randomly assigned (1:1) into two groups: a control group (routine care) and an intervention group (routine care + IMT training using a pressure threshold device). The intervention duration was 12 weeks with 30 min/day, 5 days/week. The primary outcome was breathlessness severity, assessed by the modified Borg scale (mBorg). Secondary outcomes were worst and average breathlessness over the past 24 h (assessed by the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale), breathlessness severity (assessed by the Dyspnoea-12, D-12), the 6-min walk distance (assessed by the 6-min walk test, 6MWT), quality of life (assessed by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, SGRQ), and emotional status (assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Assessments were conducted at baseline (T1), week 8 (T2), and week 12 (T3). Adjusted generalized estimating equations (GEE) models for repeated measures over time were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software. The modified intention-to-treat principle was used for data analysis.
Of the 196 participants, 190 completed the trial, and six dropped out. 31.63% of participants completely adhered to the required sessions of IMT. In the adjusted GEE model, statistical and minimal clinically important differences were observed on the m-Borg score at week 8 (P = 0.002), while no significant group-by-time effect was observed in the mBorg. Compared with the control group and baseline, participants in the intervention group showed a significant reduction in D-12 total scores at week 8 (P = 0.005) and week 12 (P = 0.004). No significant group-by-time interaction effects were observed for worst and average breathlessness over the past 24 h, anxiety, depression, 6MWT, and SGRQ scores.
This study highlights the short-term benefits of IMT for reducing breathlessness among patients with thoracic malignancies. However, the long-term effects should be explained with caution due to the participants' suboptimal adherence. Future studies should explore different strategies to improve adherence and further evaluate the sustained effects of IMT over time.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03834116.
2019-02-06.
评估抗阻吸气肌训练(IMT)对胸部恶性肿瘤患者呼吸急促的影响。
这是一项双臂、非盲、随机对照试验(RCT)。总共196名参与者被随机(1:1)分为两组:对照组(常规护理)和干预组(常规护理 + 使用压力阈值装置进行IMT训练)。干预持续时间为12周,每天30分钟,每周5天。主要结局是呼吸急促严重程度,通过改良的博格量表(mBorg)评估。次要结局是过去24小时内最严重和平均呼吸急促程度(通过11点数字评分量表评估)、呼吸急促严重程度(通过呼吸困难-12量表,D-12评估)、6分钟步行距离(通过6分钟步行试验,6MWT评估)、生活质量(通过圣乔治呼吸问卷,SGRQ评估)以及情绪状态(通过医院焦虑抑郁量表评估)。评估在基线(T1)、第8周(T2)和第12周(T3)进行。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)软件对随时间重复测量的调整广义估计方程(GEE)模型进行分析。数据分析采用改良的意向性分析原则。
196名参与者中,190名完成了试验,6名退出。31.63%的参与者完全遵守了IMT所需的训练课程。在调整后的GEE模型中,第8周时m-Borg评分观察到统计学和最小临床重要差异(P = 0.002),而在mBorg中未观察到显著的组×时间效应。与对照组和基线相比,干预组参与者在第8周(P = 0.005)和第12周(P = 0.004)时D-12总分显著降低。在过去24小时内最严重和平均呼吸急促程度、焦虑、抑郁、6MWT和SGRQ评分方面未观察到显著的组×时间交互效应。
本研究突出了IMT在减轻胸部恶性肿瘤患者呼吸急促方面的短期益处。然而,由于参与者依从性欠佳,对长期效果的解释应谨慎。未来研究应探索不同策略以提高依从性,并进一步评估IMT随时间的持续效果。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03834116。
2019年2月6日。