• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

遵循CiPA框架对基于人工智能的药物计算机心脏安全性评估新分类方法的验证。

Validation of new AI-based classification method for in silico cardiac safety assessment of drugs following the CiPA framework.

作者信息

Hanum Ulfa Latifa, Qauli Ali Ikhsanul, Fuadah Yunendah Nur, Izza Rahmafatin Nurul, Lim Ki Moo

机构信息

Department of IT Convergence Engineering, Computational Medicine Lab, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi, 39177, Republic of Korea.

Department of Engineering, Faculty of Advanced Technology and Multidiscipline, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, 60115, Jawa Timur, Indonesia.

出版信息

Arch Toxicol. 2025 May 22. doi: 10.1007/s00204-025-04079-z.

DOI:10.1007/s00204-025-04079-z
PMID:40405016
Abstract

The comprehensive in vitro proarrhythmia assay (CiPA) has paved the way for integrating in silico trials into drug evaluation processes. In alignment, the International Council for Harmonization (ICH) has initiated efforts to update the ICH S7B and E14 guidelines through a structured Questions and Answers (Q&A) format. A significant challenge in this paradigm is ensuring consistent application and evaluation of diverse proarrhythmia risk prediction models across experimental systems. This study utilized the CiPAORdv1.0 model to predict cardiac toxicity, leveraging in vitro data from 28 drugs for training and validation. A modified O'Hara-Rudy model simulated a virtual population of human ventricular cell models. Seven critical features (qNet, APD50, APD90, Camax, Carest, CaTD50, CaTD90) were extracted as inputs for analysis. CiPAORdv1.0 demonstrated robust performance, achieving predictive accuracies with an area under the curve (AUC) of 1.0 for high risk and 0.95 for low-risk categories. The calibration process was enhanced using normalized Euclidean distances (R1 and R2), effectively distinguishing risk categories. Sensitivity analysis identified key drugs, ensuring a strong calibration drug set to anchor model predictions. The proposed ANN model validated the CiPAORdv1.0 framework as an effective TdP-risk prediction system, ensuring robust and lab-specific validation. This study presents a novel algorithm leveraging artificial neural networks to implement validated cardiac safety models, addressing a critical need for standardized proarrhythmia risk assessment in drug development.

摘要

全面体外致心律失常试验(CiPA)为将计算机模拟试验整合到药物评估过程中铺平了道路。与此一致,国际协调理事会(ICH)已开始努力通过结构化问答(Q&A)形式更新ICH S7B和E14指南。这种模式的一个重大挑战是确保在不同实验系统中对各种致心律失常风险预测模型进行一致的应用和评估。本研究利用CiPAORdv1.0模型预测心脏毒性,利用28种药物的体外数据进行训练和验证。一个经过修改的奥哈拉-鲁迪模型模拟了人类心室细胞模型的虚拟群体。提取了七个关键特征(qNet、APD50、APD90、Camax、Carest、CaTD50、CaTD90)作为分析输入。CiPAORdv1.0表现出强大的性能,高风险类别曲线下面积(AUC)的预测准确率为1.0,低风险类别为0.95。使用归一化欧几里得距离(R1和R2)增强了校准过程,有效地区分了风险类别。敏感性分析确定了关键药物,确保了一个强大的校准药物集来锚定模型预测。所提出的人工神经网络(ANN)模型验证了CiPAORdv1.0框架作为一种有效的尖端扭转型室性心动过速(TdP)风险预测系统,确保了强大且针对实验室的验证。本研究提出了一种利用人工神经网络实现经过验证的心脏安全模型的新算法,满足了药物开发中标准化致心律失常风险评估的关键需求。

相似文献

1
Validation of new AI-based classification method for in silico cardiac safety assessment of drugs following the CiPA framework.遵循CiPA框架对基于人工智能的药物计算机心脏安全性评估新分类方法的验证。
Arch Toxicol. 2025 May 22. doi: 10.1007/s00204-025-04079-z.
2
A comprehensive review of 20 years of progress in nonclinical QT evaluation and proarrhythmic assessment.对非临床QT评估和致心律失常性评估20年进展的全面综述。
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2025 May 16;52(3):32. doi: 10.1007/s10928-025-09979-2.
3
CiPA-qualified human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes: A new frontier in toxicity testing by evaluating drug-induced arrhythmias.符合CiPA标准的人诱导多能干细胞衍生心肌细胞:通过评估药物诱导的心律失常在毒性测试中的新前沿。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2025 Oct;108:106100. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2025.106100. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
4
In silico cardiac safety profile of drugs and their potential to induce clinical cardiotoxicity.药物的计算机模拟心脏安全性概况及其诱发临床心脏毒性的可能性。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2025 Sep;502:117426. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2025.117426. Epub 2025 Jun 7.
5
An artificial intelligence model to predict mortality among hemodialysis patients: A retrospective validated cohort study.一种预测血液透析患者死亡率的人工智能模型:一项回顾性验证队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 29;15(1):27699. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06576-8.
6
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
7
Are Artificial Intelligence Models Reliable for Clinical Application in Pediatric Fracture Detection on Radiographs? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.人工智能模型在儿科骨折X线片检测中的临床应用是否可靠?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003660.
8
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
Establishment and validation of an interactive artificial intelligence platform to predict postoperative ambulatory status for patients with metastatic spinal disease: a multicenter analysis.建立和验证交互式人工智能平台,以预测转移性脊柱疾病患者的术后活动状态:一项多中心分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):2738-2756. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001169.
10
AI in Medical Questionnaires: Innovations, Diagnosis, and Implications.医学问卷中的人工智能:创新、诊断及影响
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 23;27:e72398. doi: 10.2196/72398.

本文引用的文献

1
Elevating performance and interpretability of in silico classifiers for drug proarrhythmia risk evaluations using multi-biomarker approach with ranking algorithm.使用带有排序算法的多生物标志物方法提高用于药物致心律失常风险评估的计算机模拟分类器的性能和可解释性。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2025 Apr;261:108609. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108609. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
2
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to find optimal in-silico biomarkers for cardiac drug toxicity evaluation.可解释人工智能(XAI)用于寻找心脏药物毒性评估的最优计算生物学标志物。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 14;14(1):24045. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71169-w.
3
Preclinical Efficacy of Peripheral Nerve Regeneration by Schwann Cell-like Cells Differentiated from Human Tonsil-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in C22 Mice.
人扁桃体来源间充质干细胞分化的类施万细胞对C22小鼠周围神经再生的临床前疗效
Biomedicines. 2023 Dec 17;11(12):3334. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11123334.
4
Machine learning approach to evaluate TdP risk of drugs using cardiac electrophysiological model including inter-individual variability.使用包含个体间变异性的心脏电生理模型评估药物TdP风险的机器学习方法。
Front Physiol. 2023 Oct 4;14:1266084. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1266084. eCollection 2023.
5
In silico assessment on TdP risks of drug combinations under CiPA paradigm.基于 CiPA 概念框架的药物组合致 TdP 风险的计算评估。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 20;13(1):2924. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29208-5.
6
qInward variability-based proarrhythmic risk assessment of drugs using deep learning model.基于深度学习模型的基于内向变异性的药物致心律失常风险评估。
Front Physiol. 2022 Dec 14;13:1080190. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1080190. eCollection 2022.
7
Use of Human iPSC-CMs in Nonclinical Regulatory Studies for Cardiac Safety Assessment.人诱导多能干细胞心肌细胞在心脏安全性评价非临床监管研究中的应用。
Toxicol Sci. 2022 Nov 23;190(2):117-126. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfac095.
8
Considering population variability of electrophysiological models improves the in silico assessment of drug-induced torsadogenic risk.考虑到电生理模型的人群变异性可以提高药物致扭转型风险的计算机评估。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Jun;221:106934. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106934. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
9
Assessment of Drug Proarrhythmicity Using Artificial Neural Networks With Deterministic Model Outputs.使用具有确定性模型输出的人工神经网络评估药物致心律失常性
Front Physiol. 2021 Dec 10;12:761691. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.761691. eCollection 2021.
10
A general procedure to select calibration drugs for lab-specific validation and calibration of proarrhythmia risk prediction models: An illustrative example using the CiPA model.一种用于选择校准药物的通用程序,用于实验室特定验证和心律失常风险预测模型的校准:使用 CiPA 模型的说明性示例。
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2020 Sep;105:106890. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2020.106890. Epub 2020 Jun 21.