Makino Takuya, Nishitani Shota, Takiguchi Shinichiro, Yao Akiko, Fujisawa Takashi X, Tomoda Akemi
Division of Developmental Higher Brain Functions, United Graduate School of Child Development, The University of Osaka, Kanazawa University, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Chiba University, University of Fukui, Osaka, Japan.
Research Center for Child Mental Development, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.
Front Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 May 8;4:1493432. doi: 10.3389/frcha.2025.1493432. eCollection 2025.
Childhood maltreatment (CM) has broad and severe adverse effects in later life, but there are not enough studies conducted during childhood close to the time of maltreatment. Most studies have focused only on a single symptom and have not attempted to capture the global picture of CM.
We used the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) to assess children's behavioral/emotional problems more comprehensively. This study leveraged 32 CM children and 29 typically developing (TD) children who have been assessed using the CBCL 4-18 from our dataset. Group comparisons of the eight subscales were conducted to characterize each behavioral/emotional problem. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to assess the classification performance. Finally, sensitive period and type analyses were performed based on the children's maltreatment history.
The CM group showed significantly higher behavioral/emotional problems in seven out of the eight subscales. Logistic regression analysis was performed using all combinations of CBCL subscale T-scores and age, sex, and IQ. We created 2047 models and performed ROC analysis for each. Three models were generated: the most accurate model (comprising CBCL T-score, age, sex, and IQ; sensitivity: 0.906, specificity: 0.966), a model excluding IQ (sensitivity: 0.875, specificity: 0.931), and a model consisting only of CBCL (sensitivity: 0.906, specificity: 0.862). The CBCL demonstrated robust predictive capacity for CM by utilizing information provided by caregivers, without directly inquiring about trauma. The sensitive period analysis revealed that the temporal predictor of severity for "withdrawn" and "thought problems" were exposure to CM at age five. Similarly, exposure to CM between the ages of five and seven predicted "somatic complaints". In the case of type, physical abuse was the predictor for "somatic complaints" and "delinquent behavior", and emotional abuse was the predictor for "anxious/depressed" and "thought problems".
Maltreated children present a wider range of behavioral/emotional problems, which must be considered when supporting them. Perspectives gained from sensitive analyses of maltreatment history will help clinicians provide more appropriate interventions.
儿童期虐待(CM)在成年后会产生广泛而严重的不良影响,但在儿童期接近虐待发生时进行的研究并不够多。大多数研究仅关注单一症状,并未试图全面了解儿童期虐待的整体情况。
我们使用儿童行为检查表(CBCL)更全面地评估儿童的行为/情绪问题。本研究利用了我们数据集中32名遭受儿童期虐待的儿童和29名发育正常(TD)的儿童,他们都使用4 - 18岁版的CBCL进行了评估。对八个分量表进行组间比较,以描述每种行为/情绪问题。进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析以评估分类性能。最后,根据儿童的虐待史进行敏感期和类型分析。
在八个分量表中的七个中,遭受儿童期虐待的组表现出显著更高的行为/情绪问题。使用CBCL分量表T分数与年龄、性别和智商的所有组合进行逻辑回归分析。我们创建了2047个模型,并对每个模型进行了ROC分析。生成了三个模型:最准确的模型(包括CBCL T分数、年龄、性别和智商;敏感性:0.906,特异性:0.966),一个排除智商的模型(敏感性:0.875,特异性:0.931),以及一个仅由CBCL组成的模型(敏感性:0.906,特异性:0.862)。CBCL通过利用照顾者提供的信息,在不直接询问创伤的情况下,对儿童期虐待表现出强大的预测能力。敏感期分析表明,“退缩”和“思维问题”严重程度的时间预测因素是五岁时遭受儿童期虐待。同样,五岁至七岁期间遭受儿童期虐待可预测“躯体主诉”。就类型而言,身体虐待是“躯体主诉”和“违法行为”的预测因素,情感虐待是“焦虑/抑郁”和“思维问题”的预测因素。
受虐待儿童存在更广泛的行为/情绪问题,在为他们提供支持时必须予以考虑。从对虐待史的敏感分析中获得的观点将有助于临床医生提供更合适的干预措施。