Doyle W J, Takahara T, Fireman P
Arch Otolaryngol. 1985 Aug;111(8):502-6. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1985.00800100050004.
To explain an allergic basis for the development of otitis media with effusion (OME), it was suggested that the middle ear mucosa can act as an allergic "shock organ." To evaluate this possibility, 16 juvenile rhesus monkeys were passively sensitized to pollen by intravenous injection of allergic human serum. All ears were then challenged by insufflation of pollen via the nose and eustachian tube (ET), twice daily, for four to five days. Daily tympanometry and otomicroscopy were performed, and on the last day of challenge, tympanocentesis was done to recover effusions. Five animals were killed and the middle ears were processed for histologic study. The results showed that none of the ears developed a middle ear effusion or OME. It is concluded that middle ear challenge with an appropriate pollen antigen in passively sensitized rhesus monkeys does not initiate an inflammatory reaction in the middle ear or induce OME.
为了解释分泌性中耳炎(OME)发生的过敏基础,有人提出中耳黏膜可作为过敏“休克器官”。为评估这种可能性,通过静脉注射过敏的人血清,使16只幼年恒河猴被动致敏于花粉。然后,通过鼻腔和咽鼓管(ET)向所有耳朵吹入花粉进行激发,每天两次,持续四至五天。每天进行鼓室图检查和耳显微镜检查,在激发的最后一天,进行鼓膜穿刺以收集积液。处死5只动物,对中耳进行组织学研究。结果表明,没有一只耳朵出现中耳积液或OME。得出的结论是,在被动致敏的恒河猴中,用适当的花粉抗原对中耳进行激发不会引发中耳的炎症反应或诱发OME。