Suppr超能文献

荷兰1型酪氨酸血症新生儿筛查的性能评估:除琥珀酰丙酮外使用其他生物标志物的改进建议。

Evaluation of the Performance of Newborn Screening for Tyrosinemia Type 1 in The Netherlands: Suggestions for Improvements Using Additional Biomarkers in Addition to Succinylacetone.

作者信息

Bouva Marelle J, Kuypers Allysa M, Kemper Evelien A, Maase Rose E, Bosch Annet M, van Spronsen Francjan J, Heijboer Annemieke C, Heiner-Fokkema M Rebecca, Heil Sandra G, Boelen Anita

机构信息

Centre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3721 MA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Neonatal Screen. 2025 May 9;11(2):35. doi: 10.3390/ijns11020035.

Abstract

Currently, Dutch newborns are screened for tyrosinemia type 1 (TT1) using succinylacetone (SA) as the biomarker. Although the sensitivity of the test is high, a high number of false positives is observed. Here, the aim is to evaluate the current Dutch newborn-screening protocol and to assess alternatives, specifically the use of biomarkers that are already being measured, to increase the positive predictive value (PPV). TT1 screening was performed with the Revvity NeoBase assay between 2008 and 2017, and since 2018, the Revvity NeoBase 2 assay has been used. Data from 2018 to 2021 were used for evaluation. To simulate alternative screening protocols, these data were enriched with results of referrals from other periods and a false negative (FN) from 2010. In 2018-2021, 693,821 newborns were screened, resulting in 23 referrals, of whom two were TT1 patients. For this period, to date, no FN have been reported, resulting in a provisional sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 99.997%, and a PPV and negative predictive value of 9% and 100%, respectively. To improve the PPV, we combined SA, tyrosine (tyr), tyr × SA and tyr/phenylalanine and achieved a PPV of 72% for this dataset without introducing FN in the original dataset. This illustrates that future screening for TT1 may benefit from the addition of these biomarkers.

摘要

目前,荷兰使用琥珀酰丙酮(SA)作为生物标志物对新生儿进行1型酪氨酸血症(TT1)筛查。尽管该检测的灵敏度很高,但仍观察到大量假阳性结果。在此,目的是评估当前荷兰的新生儿筛查方案,并评估替代方案,特别是使用已在检测的生物标志物,以提高阳性预测值(PPV)。2008年至2017年期间使用Revvity NeoBase检测法进行TT1筛查,自2018年起,开始使用Revvity NeoBase 2检测法。使用2018年至2021年的数据进行评估。为了模拟替代筛查方案,这些数据补充了其他时期转诊的结果以及2010年的一例假阴性(FN)结果。2018年至2021年期间,对693,821名新生儿进行了筛查,有23例被转诊,其中两例为TT1患者。截至目前,该时期未报告FN,临时灵敏度为100%,特异性为99.997%,PPV和阴性预测值分别为9%和100%。为了提高PPV,我们将SA、酪氨酸(tyr)、tyr×SA和tyr/苯丙氨酸结合起来,在不引入原始数据集中FN的情况下,该数据集的PPV达到了72%。这表明未来TT1筛查可能会受益于添加这些生物标志物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8380/12101382/03c54dbe44fe/IJNS-11-00035-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验