Kuypers Allysa M, Bouva Marelle J, Loeber J Gerard, Boelen Anita, Dekkers Eugenie, Petritis Konstantinos, Pickens C Austin, van Spronsen Francjan J, Heiner-Fokkema M Rebecca
Section of Metabolic Diseases, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Centre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2024 Dec 16;10(4):82. doi: 10.3390/ijns10040082.
In The Netherlands, newborn screening (NBS) for tyrosinemia type 1 (TT1) uses dried blood spot (DBS) succinylacetone (SUAC) as a biomarker. However, high false-positive (FP) rates and a false-negative (FN) case show that the Dutch TT1 NBS protocol is suboptimal. In search of optimization options, we evaluated the protocols used by other NBS programs and their performance. We distributed an online survey to NBS program representatives worldwide ( = 41). Questions focused on the organization and performance of the programs and on changes since implementation. Thirty-three representatives completed the survey. TT1 incidence ranged from 1/13,636 to 1/750,000. Most NBS samples are taken between 36 and 72 h after birth. Most used biomarkers were DBS SUAC (78.9%), DBS Tyrosine (Tyr; 5.3%), or DBS Tyr with second tier SUAC (15.8%). The pooled median cut-off for SUAC was 1.50 µmol/L (range 0.3-7.0 µmol/L). The median cut-off from programs using laboratory-developed tests was significantly higher (2.63 µmol/L) than the medians from programs using commercial kits (range 1.0-1.7 µmol/L). The pooled median cut-off for Tyr was 216 µmol/L (range 120-600 µmol/L). Overall positive predictive values were 27.3% for SUAC, 1.2% for Tyr solely, and 90.1% for Tyr + SUAC. One FN result was reported for TT1 NBS using SUAC, while three FN results were reported for TT1 NBS using Tyr. The NBS programs for TT1 vary worldwide in terms of analytical methods, biochemical markers, and cut-off values. There is room for improvement through method standardization, cut-off adaptation, and integration of new biomarkers. Further enhancement is likely to be achieved by the application of post-analytical tools.
在荷兰,1型酪氨酸血症(TT1)的新生儿筛查(NBS)使用干血斑(DBS)中的琥珀酰丙酮(SUAC)作为生物标志物。然而,高假阳性(FP)率和1例假阴性(FN)病例表明,荷兰的TT1 NBS方案并非最优。为了寻找优化方案,我们评估了其他NBS项目所使用的方案及其性能。我们向全球的NBS项目代表(n = 41)开展了一项在线调查。问题聚焦于项目的组织与性能以及实施后的变化。33名代表完成了调查。TT1的发病率在1/13,636至1/750,000之间。大多数NBS样本在出生后36至72小时采集。最常用的生物标志物是DBS SUAC(78.9%)、DBS酪氨酸(Tyr;5.3%)或DBS Tyr加二线SUAC(15.8%)。SUAC的合并中位临界值为1.50 µmol/L(范围0.3 - 7.0 µmol/L)。使用实验室自行开发检测方法的项目的中位临界值(2.63 µmol/L)显著高于使用商业试剂盒的项目的中位临界值(范围1.0 - 1.7 µmol/L)。Tyr的合并中位临界值为216 µmol/L(范围120 - 600 µmol/L)。SUAC的总体阳性预测值为27.3%,单独Tyr的为1.2%,Tyr + SUAC的为90.1%。使用SUAC进行TT1 NBS报告了1例假阴性结果,而使用Tyr进行TT1 NBS报告了3例假阴性结果。全球范围内,TT1的NBS项目在分析方法、生化标志物和临界值方面存在差异。通过方法标准化、临界值调整和新生物标志物的整合,仍有改进空间。应用分析后工具可能会进一步提高检测效果。