Suppr超能文献

自评定时起立行走测试在评估社区居住老年人跌倒风险中的有效性和可靠性

Validity and Reliability of the Self-Administered Timed Up and Go Test in Assessing Fall Risk in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

作者信息

Reis Magda, Teixeira Maria, Carvão Carlota, Martins Anabela Correia

机构信息

Physiotherapy, Coimbra Health School, Polytechnic University of Coimbra, Rua 5 de Outubro, 3045-043 Coimbra, Portugal.

H&TRC-Health & Technology Research Center, Coimbra Health School, Polytechnic University of Coimbra, Rua 5 de Outubro, 3045-043 Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

Geriatrics (Basel). 2025 Apr 29;10(3):62. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics10030062.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the self-administered Timed Up and Go (TUG) test-a gold standard for fall risk screening-by comparing it to the traditional face-to-face assessment conducted by a physiotherapist. A total of 37 community-dwelling adults-mean age 61.78 ± 6.88, 73% female-who took part in fall risk screening actions in the central region of Portugal were assessed. The protocol included sociodemographic and history of falls questions, the Self-Efficacy for Exercise questionnaire, the Activities and Participation Profile Related to Mobility (PAPM), and three functional tests, namely the 10-Metre Walking Speed (10-MWS), TUG, and 30 Seconds Sit to Stand (30 s STS) tests. Within an interval of 18-24 h after the face-to-face moment, the participants were instructed to self-administer the TUG test at home. The validity and reliability of self-administered TUG test were examined using the limits of agreement, clinically acceptable limit, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), paired -tests, and Pearson's coefficient correlation (r). The limits of agreement for self-administered assessment were within the clinically acceptable limits. The average result of the face-to-face TUG test and the self-administered TUG test was 7.47 ± 2.45 and 7.57 ± 3.10 s, respectively. When comparing the two evaluations, they were strongly associated (r = 0.716, < 0.001), with an excellent ICC of 0.82 (0.65-0.91), for a 95% confidence interval and significance level of 0.05 ( ≤ 0.05). The use of the self-administered TUG test for the screening of risk of fall, using low-cost technology, appears to be valid and reliable in community-dwelling adults aged 50 and above. Enabling older adults to perform the TUG test at home can empower them to take an active role in managing their health and ageing process, while also offering physiotherapists regular feedback for fall prevention.

摘要

本研究旨在通过将自我管理的计时起立行走(TUG)测试(一种跌倒风险筛查的金标准)与物理治疗师进行的传统面对面评估相比较,来评估其有效性和可靠性。对总共37名居住在社区的成年人进行了评估,他们的平均年龄为61.78±6.88岁,女性占73%,这些人参与了葡萄牙中部地区的跌倒风险筛查行动。该方案包括社会人口统计学和跌倒史问题、运动自我效能量表、与 mobility 相关的活动和参与概况(PAPM),以及三项功能测试,即10米步行速度(10-MWS)测试、TUG测试和30秒坐立测试(30 s STS)。在面对面评估后的18至24小时内,参与者被指示在家中自行进行TUG测试。使用一致性界限、临床可接受界限、组内相关系数(ICC)、配对t检验和皮尔逊相关系数(r)来检验自我管理的TUG测试的有效性和可靠性。自我管理评估的一致性界限在临床可接受范围内。面对面TUG测试和自我管理TUG测试的平均结果分别为7.47±2.45秒和7.57±3.10秒。在比较这两种评估时,它们高度相关(r = 0.716,P < 0.001),对于95%置信区间和0.05的显著性水平(P ≤ 0.05),ICC为0.82(0.65 - 0.91),非常出色。使用低成本技术的自我管理TUG测试用于跌倒风险筛查,在50岁及以上的社区居住成年人中似乎是有效且可靠的。让老年人在家中进行TUG测试可以使他们在管理自身健康和衰老过程中发挥积极作用,同时也为物理治疗师提供预防跌倒的定期反馈。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dac7/12101206/5c74da607e0e/geriatrics-10-00062-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验