Feinberg David A, Ma Samantha J, Walker Erica, Beckett Alexander J S, Rattenbacher Dominik, Rummert Elmar, Dietz Peter, Davids Mathias, Boulant Nicolas
Department of Neuroscience and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, Brain Imaging Center, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Advanced MRI Technologies, Sebastopol, California, USA.
Magn Reson Med. 2025 Sep;94(3):1326-1338. doi: 10.1002/mrm.30523. Epub 2025 May 23.
Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) remains a physiologic limitation to boosting spatiotemporal resolution with more powerful gradients. We investigate discrepancies in previous measurements and model predictions from PNS experienced by volunteers scanned with the investigational "Impulse" gradient coil on the NexGen 7T scanner.
Twenty-nine volunteers (18 males, mean ± standard deviation age 52.2 ± 17.1 years) underwent PNS characterizations in the scanner. The process was repeated after the subject positions were moved by 2 and 4 cm toward the feet, away from isocenter. These new data were compared with prior experimental data acquired at the factory (32 volunteers, 16 males, mean ± standard deviation age 58.3 ± 13.5 years) and to modeling results initially used to guide the gradient winding pattern.
The PNS threshold for the x-axis (left-right) was significantly below the threshold level predicted by the model used to optimize the wiring pattern and thresholds measured in the factory, whereas there was closer agreement for the y-axis (anterior-posterior) and z-axis (superior-inferior). The x-axis threshold increased as the subject was moved in the Z-direction toward the foot end of the magnet, at the expense of gradient nonlinearity distortions. Sensitivity of the threshold for the x-axis was measured as 20 mT/m per centimeter Z-offset.
The PNS threshold of the x-axis measured in the scanner was much lower than predicted by the optimization model and as measured at the factory. Our measurements verified that PNS thresholds of asymmetric head gradient coils were sensitive to head position, subject variability, and age. The discrepancy of the PNS prediction model remains to be elucidated.
周围神经刺激(PNS)仍然是使用更强梯度提高时空分辨率的生理限制因素。我们研究了使用NexGen 7T扫描仪上的研究性“脉冲”梯度线圈扫描的志愿者所经历的PNS的先前测量值与模型预测值之间的差异。
29名志愿者(18名男性,平均年龄±标准差为52.2±17.1岁)在扫描仪中进行了PNS特征描述。在受试者位置向脚部移动2厘米和4厘米、远离等中心后,重复该过程。将这些新数据与工厂获取的先前实验数据(32名志愿者,16名男性,平均年龄±标准差为58.3±13.5岁)以及最初用于指导梯度绕组模式的建模结果进行比较。
x轴(左右)的PNS阈值显著低于用于优化布线模式的模型预测的阈值水平以及在工厂测量的阈值,而y轴(前后)和z轴(上下)的一致性更高。随着受试者在Z方向朝着磁体的脚部移动,x轴阈值增加,但以梯度非线性失真为代价。测量得出x轴阈值的灵敏度为每厘米Z偏移20 mT/m。
扫描仪中测量的x轴PNS阈值远低于优化模型预测的以及在工厂测量的阈值。我们的测量结果证实,非对称头部梯度线圈的PNS阈值对头位置、受试者变异性和年龄敏感。PNS预测模型的差异仍有待阐明。