• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经腹腹膜前疝修补术后血清肿的严重程度分级及危险因素

Severity classification and risk factors of seroma after transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair.

作者信息

Hayakawa Shunsuke, Hayakawa Tetsushi, Watanabe Kaori, Saito Kenta, Miyai Hirotaka, Sagawa Hiroyuki, Ogawa Ryo, Yamamoto Minoru, Kobayashi Kenji, Tanaka Moritsugu, Takiguchi Shuji

机构信息

Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya City University, 1banchi Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya City, Aichi, 467-8602, Japan.

Department of General Surgery, Kariya Toyota General Hospital, Kariya, Japan.

出版信息

Hernia. 2025 May 23;29(1):177. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03366-z.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-025-03366-z
PMID:40407937
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to develop a classification to precisely describe seroma following transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP) as well as identify risk factors and create a prediction model for seroma development.

METHODS

Postoperative seroma was classified into grades 0-IV, with grades ≥ II defined as the seroma group (S group: 265 cases), which was compared with the normal course group (N group: 1,279 cases) to determine risk factors using logistic regression analysis. A prediction model was developed based on these independent predictors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to assess the discriminability and calibrability of the model. Additionally, a model to validate the incidence of seroma was used for risk stratification.

RESULTS

This classification revealed grades 0, I, II, III, and IV in 1,194 (70.9%), 85 (5.5%), 236 (15.3%), 12 (0.8%), and 17 (1.1%) patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed risk factors for seroma formation, including age of > 66 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists scores of ≥ 2, surgery for recurrent hernia, size of hernia defect of > 3 cm, and duration of sickness of > 1 year. The prediction model demonstrated the rates of seroma in the low, moderate, and high score groups of 10.5% (103/984), 23.7% (99/417), and 44.1% (63/143), respectively.

CONCLUSION

A postoperative complication of TAPP was proposed as a severity classification of seroma. A model to predict the seroma was developed based on the identified risk factors, thereby confirming the possibility of preoperative prediction of the seroma.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在建立一种分类方法,以精确描述经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)后血清肿的情况,同时识别风险因素并创建血清肿发生的预测模型。

方法

术后血清肿分为0-IV级,≥II级定义为血清肿组(S组:265例),与正常病程组(N组:1279例)进行比较,采用逻辑回归分析确定风险因素。基于这些独立预测因素建立预测模型。进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析以评估模型的区分能力和校准能力。此外,使用一个验证血清肿发生率的模型进行风险分层。

结果

该分类显示,1194例(70.9%)、85例(5.5%)、236例(15.3%)、12例(0.8%)和17例(1.1%)患者分别为0级、I级、II级、III级和IV级。多因素分析揭示了血清肿形成的风险因素,包括年龄>66岁、美国麻醉医师协会评分≥2、复发性疝手术、疝缺损大小>3 cm以及病程>1年。预测模型显示,低、中、高分值组的血清肿发生率分别为10.5%(103/984)、23.7%(99/417)和44.1%(63/143)。

结论

提出了TAPP术后并发症血清肿的严重程度分类。基于识别出的风险因素建立了血清肿预测模型,从而证实了术前预测血清肿的可能性。

相似文献

1
Severity classification and risk factors of seroma after transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair.经腹腹膜前疝修补术后血清肿的严重程度分级及危险因素
Hernia. 2025 May 23;29(1):177. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03366-z.
2
Establishment of a Predictive Model for Seroma Formation After TAPP Repair for Unilateral Indirect Inguinal Hernia in Males.男性单侧腹股沟斜疝TAPP修补术后血清肿形成预测模型的建立
Am Surg. 2025 Mar;91(3):351-360. doi: 10.1177/00031348241300369. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
3
Little influence of the abandoned sac on seroma formation following laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of lateral inguinal hernia.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补外侧腹股沟疝后,废弃疝囊对血清肿形成影响较小。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1740-1748. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11523-1. Epub 2025 Jan 14.
4
Seroma following transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP): incidence, risk factors, and preventive measures.经腹腹膜前补片修补术后血清肿:发生率、危险因素和预防措施。
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2222-2231. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5912-3. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
5
Effects of intraoperative fixation of residual hernia sac on postoperative seroma in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中固定残余疝囊对术后血清肿的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Updates Surg. 2023 Aug;75(5):1343-1349. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01442-y. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
6
Investigation of risk factors for postoperative seroma/hematoma after TAPP.经腹腹膜前疝修补术后血清肿/血肿的危险因素研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):4741-4747. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08814-2. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
7
Risk factors and clinical impact of seroma formation following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective study.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后血清肿形成的危险因素及临床影响:一项回顾性研究
BMC Surg. 2024 Oct 1;24(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02574-1.
8
Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: retrospective comparison of TEP and TAPP procedures in a tertiary referral center.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:三级转诊中心 TEP 和 TAPP 手术的回顾性比较。
Minerva Chir. 2020 Oct;75(5):279-285. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08518-1.
9
Influence of the hernia sac treatment method on the occurrence of seroma after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair.疝囊处理方法对腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术后血清肿发生的影响
Asian J Surg. 2023 Feb;46(2):718-722. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.07.004. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
10
Navigating hernia sac management in minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair: to abandon or to reduce? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.微创腹股沟疝修补术中疝囊处理的抉择:摒弃还是回纳?一项更新的系统评价与荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7045-7054. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11323-7. Epub 2024 Oct 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary abandon of hernia sac for inguinoscrotal hernias: a safe way to cut corners.腹股沟疝囊的初次旷置:一种安全的偷工减料方法。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8421-8428. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10416-z. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
2
Influence of the hernia sac treatment method on the occurrence of seroma after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair.疝囊处理方法对腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术后血清肿发生的影响
Asian J Surg. 2023 Feb;46(2):718-722. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.07.004. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
3
Evaluation of long-term chronic pain and outcomes for unilateral vs bilateral circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.
单侧与双侧环形切口经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的长期慢性疼痛及预后评估
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2022 Feb 16;6(4):577-586. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12556. eCollection 2022 Jul.
4
Investigation of risk factors for postoperative seroma/hematoma after TAPP.经腹腹膜前疝修补术后血清肿/血肿的危险因素研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):4741-4747. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08814-2. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
5
Effect of direct defect closure during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair ("TEP/TAPP plus" technique) on post-operative outcomes.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中直接闭合缺损(“TEP/TAPP 附加”技术)对术后结果的影响。
Hernia. 2020 Feb;24(1):167-171. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02036-1. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
6
Intraoperative adjunctive techniques to reduce seroma formation in laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty: a systematic review.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中减少血清肿形成的术中辅助技术:一项系统评价
Hernia. 2019 Aug;23(4):723-731. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01903-1. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
7
Correlation between laparoscopic transection of an indirect inguinal hernial sac and postoperative seroma formation: a prospective randomized controlled study.腹腔镜横断间接腹股沟疝囊与术后血清肿形成的相关性:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1147-1154. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6374-y. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
8
Closure of a direct inguinal hernia defect in laparoscopic repair with barbed suture: a simple method to prevent seroma formation?腹腔镜修补中使用带倒刺缝线关闭腹股沟直疝缺损:预防血清肿形成的简单方法?
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):1082-1086. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5760-1. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
9
Adult abdominal hernias.成人腹外疝。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jun;202(6):W506-11. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.12071.
10
A new classification for seroma after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜下腹膜前修补术后血清肿的新分类。
Hernia. 2012 Jun;16(3):261-7. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0911-8. Epub 2012 Apr 17.