• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卡博特韦与替诺福韦艾拉酚胺加恩曲他滨以及替诺福韦酯加恩曲他滨用于男同性恋、双性恋和其他与男性发生性行为者暴露前预防以防止HIV-1传播的成本效益比较

Cost-effectiveness of cabotegravir versus tenofovir alafenamide plus emtricitabine versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine for pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV-1 transmission in gay, bisexual and other men that have sex with men.

作者信息

Wikman-Jorgensen Philip Erick, Ruiz-Algueró Marta, Iniesta Carlos, Pulido Federico, Llenas-García Jara

机构信息

Internal Medicine & Infectious Diseases Department, Elda General University Hospital-FISABIO, Elda, Spain; Clinical Medicine Department, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Elche, Spain.

Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Centre of Biomedical Research for Infectious Diseases (CIBERINFEC), Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2025 Aug-Sep;43(7):416-425. doi: 10.1016/j.eimce.2024.12.014. Epub 2025 May 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.eimce.2024.12.014
PMID:40410032
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to compare the cost-effectiveness of currently approved daily PrEP in Spain, with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine (TDF/FTC), in gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) versus newer alternatives like daily tenofovir alafenamide plus emtricitabine (TAF/FTC) or injectable cabotegravir every 2 months (CAB).

METHODS

We fitted a dynamic compartmentalized Markov model that represents the dynamics of HIV-1 transmission in GBMSM in Spain. The model was calibrated to replicate the epidemiological data of the HIV epidemic in GBMSM in Spain from 2013 to 2018. We used the perspective of the national health system and applied a 40-year time horizon. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were the health outcome variable, and the cost was accounted for in 2018 Euros (€). Our outcome variable was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for PrEP. We used the 2018 gross domestic product per capita of Spain (€25,854) as the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold.

RESULTS

The 2019 scenario with no PrEP in place would yield 17,424,891 QALYs and a cost of 2018 €17,345,310,254. The present scenario of daily TDF/FTC yields 18,615,325 QALYs, an increase of 1,190,434 QALYs at a cost of 2018 €15,354,878,534 (decrease of -2018 €1,990,431,719), generating an ICER of -2018 €1672 per QALY gained. The introduction of daily TAF/FTC in the present scenario would yield an increase in 449,392 QALYs at an additional cost of 2018 €13,634,260,217. The ICER would thus be 2018 €30,339 per QALY gained. Introducing CAB in the present scenario would yield an increase of 573,007 QALYs at an additional cost of 2018 €16,754,471,790 (average cost-effectiveness ratio=29,239). Compared to TAF, the increase in QALYs would be 123,614 at an additional cost of 2018 €5,707,367,590, yielding an ICER of 2018 €46,170/QALY gained. A one-way sensitivity analysis and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis was carried out.

CONCLUSION

The present Spanish policy of PrEP is a cost-saving strategy. TAF/FTC and CAB are not cost-effective at current market prices.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在比较西班牙目前批准的每日暴露前预防用药(PrEP)方案,即替诺福韦酯富马酸盐加恩曲他滨(TDF/FTC),在男同性恋、双性恋和其他与男性发生性关系的男性(GBMSM)中的成本效益,与新的替代方案,如每日替诺福韦艾拉酚胺加恩曲他滨(TAF/FTC)或每两个月注射一次卡博特韦(CAB)。

方法

我们构建了一个动态的分区马尔可夫模型,该模型代表了西班牙GBMSM中HIV-1传播的动态情况。该模型经过校准,以复制2013年至2018年西班牙GBMSM中HIV流行的流行病学数据。我们采用国家卫生系统的视角,并应用40年的时间范围。质量调整生命年(QALYs)是健康结果变量,成本以2018年欧元(€)计算。我们的结果变量是PrEP的增量成本效益比(ICER)。我们将2018年西班牙人均国内生产总值(€25,854)用作支付意愿(WTP)阈值。

结果

2019年未实施PrEP的情景将产生17,424,891个QALYs,成本为2018年€17,345,310,254。目前每日使用TDF/FTC的情景产生18,615,325个QALYs,增加了1,190,434个QALYs,成本为2018年€15,354,878,534(减少了-2018年€1,990,431,719),每获得一个QALY的ICER为-2018年€1672。在当前情景中引入每日TAF/FTC将使QALYs增加449,392个,额外成本为2018年€13,634,260,217。因此,ICER将为每获得一个QALY 2018年€30,339。在当前情景中引入CAB将使QALYs增加573,007个,额外成本为2018年€16,754,471,790(平均成本效益比=29,239)。与TAF相比,QALYs增加123,614个,额外成本为2018年€5,707,367,590,每获得一个QALY的ICER为2018年€46,170。进行了单向敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析。

结论

西班牙目前的PrEP政策是一种节省成本的策略。TAF/FTC和CAB在当前市场价格下不具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of cabotegravir versus tenofovir alafenamide plus emtricitabine versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine for pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV-1 transmission in gay, bisexual and other men that have sex with men.卡博特韦与替诺福韦艾拉酚胺加恩曲他滨以及替诺福韦酯加恩曲他滨用于男同性恋、双性恋和其他与男性发生性行为者暴露前预防以防止HIV-1传播的成本效益比较
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2025 Aug-Sep;43(7):416-425. doi: 10.1016/j.eimce.2024.12.014. Epub 2025 May 22.
2
Cost-effective pricing of long-acting injectable HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis for adolescent girls and young women in South Africa: a model-based analysis.南非针对青春期女孩和年轻女性的长效注射用艾滋病毒暴露前预防药物的成本效益定价:基于模型的分析
Lancet Glob Health. 2025 May 26. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00119-6.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Long-Acting Injectable HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis in the United States : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.长效注射型 HIV 暴露前预防在美国的成本效益:成本效益分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Apr;175(4):479-489. doi: 10.7326/M21-1548. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
4
Relative cost-effectiveness of long-acting injectable cabotegravir versus oral pre-exposure prophylaxis in South Africa based on the HPTN 083 and HPTN 084 trials: a modelled economic evaluation and threshold analysis.基于 HPTN 083 和 HPTN 084 试验的南非长效注射型卡替拉韦与口服暴露前预防的相对成本效益:模型经济评估和阈值分析。
Lancet HIV. 2022 Dec;9(12):e857-e867. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(22)00251-X. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
5
Efficacy and safety of long-acting cabotegravir compared with daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine to prevent HIV infection in cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men 1 year after study unblinding: a secondary analysis of the phase 2b and 3 HPTN 083 randomised controlled trial.长效卡替拉韦与每日口服替诺福韦酯富马酸二吡呋酯/恩曲他滨相比预防无对照研究 1 年后与男性发生性行为的顺性别男性和跨性别女性感染 HIV 的疗效和安全性:HPTN 083 随机对照 2b 期和 3 期试验的二次分析。
Lancet HIV. 2023 Dec;10(12):e767-e778. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(23)00261-8. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
6
Comparative Pricing of Branded Tenofovir Alafenamide-Emtricitabine Relative to Generic Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate-Emtricitabine for HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.品牌替诺福韦艾拉酚胺/恩曲他滨与替诺福韦二吡呋酯/恩曲他滨仿制药用于 HIV 暴露前预防的比较定价:成本效果分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 May 5;172(9):583-590. doi: 10.7326/M19-3478. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
7
Optimising HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis and testing strategies in men who have sex with men in Australia, Thailand, and China: a modelling study and cost-effectiveness analysis.在中国、澳大利亚和泰国优化男男性行为者的 HIV 暴露前预防和检测策略:一项建模研究和成本效益分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2024 Feb;12(2):e243-e256. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00536-3.
8
Tenofovir alafenamide is superior to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and entecavir in cost-effectiveness of treatment of chronic hepatitis B in china with new volume-based procurement policy.在中国新的按采购量计价政策下,替诺福韦艾拉酚胺在慢性乙型肝炎治疗的成本效益方面优于富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯和恩替卡韦。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 11;20(7):e0327298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327298. eCollection 2025.
9
Maintenance therapy with dolutegravir and lamivudine versus bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide in people with HIV (PASO-DOBLE): 48-week results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority trial.多替拉韦与拉米夫定维持治疗对比比克替拉韦、恩曲他滨和替诺福韦艾拉酚胺用于HIV感染者(PASO-DOBLE):一项随机、多中心、开放标签、非劣效性试验的48周结果
Lancet HIV. 2025 Jul;12(7):e473-e484. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(25)00105-5. Epub 2025 Jun 7.
10
Long-term safety and efficacy of emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis: week 96 results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.恩曲他滨和丙酚替诺福韦艾拉酚胺与恩曲他滨和替诺福韦二吡呋酯用于 HIV-1 暴露前预防的长期安全性和有效性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、3 期临床试验的第 96 周结果。
Lancet HIV. 2021 Jul;8(7):e397-e407. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00071-0.