• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主流平台上儿科肺炎相关短视频的质量与可靠性:横断面研究

Quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia related short videos on mainstream platforms: cross-sectional study.

作者信息

He Fengqi, Yang Mei, Liu Jun, Gong Ting, Ma Jinhua, Yang Tian, Zhao Dandong, Li Shaunglian, Tian Daiyin

机构信息

Department of Respiratory of Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, No. 20, Jinyu Avenue, Liangjiang New District, Chongqing, 401122, China.

Chongqing Shapingba Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2025 May 23;25(1):1896. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22963-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-025-22963-2
PMID:40410758
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pediatric pneumonia remains a major global health concern, accounting for one of the leading causes of mortality among children under five years of age. With the prevalence of COVID-19, public attention to pediatric pneumonia has significantly increased. In recent years, short video platforms such as Bilibili, TikTok, and Kwai-boasting billions of global users-have emerged as critical channels for disseminating and accessing health-related information. This study systematically evaluates the quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia-related short videos on the aforementioned three platforms.

METHODS

We employed the Chinese keyword "Pneumonia in Children" to conduct searches on Bilibili, TikTok, and Kwai, selected the top 100 recommended related videos of each platform, and extracted and recorded the title, website, publisher, content, duration, days since published, and audience engagement metrics (Likes, Comments, Saves) of each video. The Global Quality Scale (GQS), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), and Medical Quality Video Evaluation Tool (MQ-VET) were used to evaluate video quality and reliability. Finally, statistical analyses were conducted to compare quality differences among different platforms, different types of publishers, and different video content.

RESULTS

Significant variations in audience engagement metrics (likes, comments, and saves) were observed across the three platforms (p < 0.01), with TikTok demonstrating the highest values for all metrics. The categorization of video content and publisher types exhibited statistically significant heterogeneity among the platforms (p < 0.001). Videos created by medical professionals exhibited significantly elevated quality and reliability assessment scores in comparison to content generated by non-medical practitioners (p < 0.001). Bilibili consistently achieved the highest scores across all evaluation tools (GQS, mDISCERN, and MQ-VET scores; p < 0.001), particularly for content produced by medical professionals. Compared with News and reports, videos focused on disease Disease knowledge and Treatment and prevention received significantly higher scores (p < 0.001). Notably, a negative correlation was identified between video quality scores and audience engagement metrics(p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The overall quality of video content on the three platforms Bilibili, TikTok, and Kwai is average, with low reliability, among which Bilibili's video quality and reliability are higher than the other two platforms. Meanwhile, videos published by medical professionals have better quality and higher reliability.

摘要

背景

小儿肺炎仍然是全球主要的健康问题,是五岁以下儿童主要死因之一。随着新冠疫情的流行,公众对小儿肺炎的关注度显著提高。近年来,哔哩哔哩、抖音和快手等拥有数十亿全球用户的短视频平台已成为传播和获取健康相关信息的重要渠道。本研究系统评估了上述三个平台上与小儿肺炎相关的短视频的质量和可靠性。

方法

我们使用中文关键词“小儿肺炎”在哔哩哔哩、抖音和快手上进行搜索,选取每个平台上推荐的前100个相关视频,并提取和记录每个视频的标题、网址、发布者、内容、时长、发布天数以及观众参与度指标(点赞、评论、收藏)。使用全球质量量表(GQS)、改良的辨别力量表(mDISCERN)和医学质量视频评估工具(MQ-VET)来评估视频质量和可靠性。最后,进行统计分析以比较不同平台、不同类型发布者和不同视频内容之间的质量差异。

结果

在三个平台上观察到观众参与度指标(点赞、评论和收藏)存在显著差异(p < 0.01),抖音在所有指标上的值最高。视频内容和发布者类型的分类在各平台之间表现出统计学上的显著异质性(p < 0.001)。与非医学从业者制作的内容相比,医学专业人员制作的视频在质量和可靠性评估得分上显著更高(p < 0.001)。哔哩哔哩在所有评估工具(GQS、mDISCERN和MQ-VET得分)上始终获得最高分(p < 0.001),特别是医学专业人员制作的内容。与新闻和报道相比,专注于疾病知识以及治疗和预防的视频得分显著更高(p < 0.001)。值得注意的是,视频质量得分与观众参与度指标之间存在负相关(p < 0.05)。

结论

哔哩哔哩、抖音和快手这三个平台上视频内容的整体质量一般,可靠性较低,其中哔哩哔哩的视频质量和可靠性高于其他两个平台。同时,医学专业人员发布的视频质量更好,可靠性更高。

相似文献

1
Quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia related short videos on mainstream platforms: cross-sectional study.主流平台上儿科肺炎相关短视频的质量与可靠性:横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 23;25(1):1896. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22963-2.
2
Assessment of the reliability and quality of breast cancer related videos on TikTok and Bilibili: cross-sectional study in China.TikTok和哔哩哔哩上乳腺癌相关视频的可靠性和质量评估:中国的横断面研究
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 22;11:1296386. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1296386. eCollection 2023.
3
YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok videos as sources of medical information on laryngeal carcinoma: cross-sectional content analysis study.YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok 视频作为喉癌医学信息来源:横断面内容分析研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):1594. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19077-6.
4
Quality and reliability evaluation of pancreatic cancer-related video content on social short video platforms: a cross-sectional study.社交短视频平台上胰腺癌相关视频内容的质量与可靠性评估:一项横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 24;25(1):1919. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23130-3.
5
Quality and Reliability of Liver Cancer-Related Short Chinese Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study.肝癌相关短视频在 TikTok 和 Bilibili 上的质量与可靠性:一项横断面内容分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 5;25:e47210. doi: 10.2196/47210.
6
The Quality of Short Videos as a Source of Coronary Heart Disease Information on TikTok: Cross-Sectional Study.短视频质量作为 TikTok 冠心病信息来源的研究:横断面研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Sep 3;8:e51513. doi: 10.2196/51513.
7
Video Quality Assessment and Analysis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study.抖音和哔哩哔哩上胃食管反流病的视频质量评估与分析:横断面研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Dec 11;17:5927-5939. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S485781. eCollection 2024.
8
Quality of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Videos Available on TikTok and Bilibili: Content Analysis.抖音和哔哩哔哩上胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤视频的质量:内容分析
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 11;8:e60033. doi: 10.2196/60033.
9
The reliability and quality of short videos as health information of guidance for lymphedema: a cross-sectional study.作为淋巴水肿指导健康信息的短视频的可靠性和质量:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 3;12:1472583. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1472583. eCollection 2024.
10
The quality and reliability of short videos about thyroid nodules on BiliBili and TikTok: Cross-sectional study.哔哩哔哩和抖音上关于甲状腺结节短视频的质量与可靠性:横断面研究
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 7;10:20552076241288831. doi: 10.1177/20552076241288831. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Health Communication on the Internet: Promoting Public Health and Exploring Disparities in the Generative AI Era.互联网上的健康传播:在生成式人工智能时代促进公众健康并探索差异
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 6;27:e66032. doi: 10.2196/66032.
2
A Review of ChatGPT as a Reliable Source of Scientific Information Regarding Endodontic Local Anesthesia.关于ChatGPT作为牙髓病局部麻醉科学信息可靠来源的综述
J Endod. 2025 May;51(5):571-576. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2025.02.002. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
3
Opportunities and Challenges of Chatbots in Ophthalmology: A Narrative Review.
眼科领域中聊天机器人的机遇与挑战:一篇叙述性综述
J Pers Med. 2024 Dec 21;14(12):1165. doi: 10.3390/jpm14121165.
4
Video Quality Assessment and Analysis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study.抖音和哔哩哔哩上胃食管反流病的视频质量评估与分析:横断面研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Dec 11;17:5927-5939. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S485781. eCollection 2024.
5
Quality of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Videos Available on TikTok and Bilibili: Content Analysis.抖音和哔哩哔哩上胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤视频的质量:内容分析
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 11;8:e60033. doi: 10.2196/60033.
6
Comparative analysis of NAFLD-related health videos on TikTok: a cross-language study in the USA and China.TikTok上非酒精性脂肪性肝病相关健康视频的比较分析:美国和中国的跨语言研究
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 4;24(1):3375. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20851-9.
7
Analyzing dissemination, quality, and reliability of Chinese brain tumor-related short videos on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-sectional study.分析TikTok和哔哩哔哩上与脑肿瘤相关的中文短视频的传播、质量和可靠性:一项横断面研究。
Front Neurol. 2024 Oct 18;15:1404038. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1404038. eCollection 2024.
8
A SIMBA CoMICs Initiative to Cocreating and Disseminating Evidence-Based, Peer-Reviewed Short Videos on Social Media: Mixed Methods Prospective Study.SIMBA 合作创作和传播社交媒体上基于证据的同行评审短视频倡议:混合方法前瞻性研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Oct 30;10:e52924. doi: 10.2196/52924.
9
Quality Assessment of YouTube Videos on Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) for Cancer Using a Newly Developed Tool.使用新开发工具评估关于癌症的补充和替代医学(CAM)的 YouTube 视频的质量。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2024 Jan-Dec;23:15347354241293417. doi: 10.1177/15347354241293417.
10
The quality and reliability of short videos about thyroid nodules on BiliBili and TikTok: Cross-sectional study.哔哩哔哩和抖音上关于甲状腺结节短视频的质量与可靠性:横断面研究
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 7;10:20552076241288831. doi: 10.1177/20552076241288831. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.