Gao Hongfei, Qiao Xuning, Yang Yongju, Liu Liang, Zhang Jinyuan, Zhou Huimin, Zheng Qianxi
School of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, 454003, China.
Research Centre of Arable Land Protection and Urban-rural High-quality Development of Yellow River Basin, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, 454003, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 May 24;15(1):18116. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03009-4.
Urban land density analysis is central to urban expansion research. Different mathematical models have unique strengths and limitations in exploring land density, yet there is little systematic comparison between them. This paper addresses this gap by analyzing land use data from 2000 to 2020 in Zhengzhou City, using two models: the Gaussian function and the inverse S function. It quantifies changes in land density and expansion trends, while also comparing the models' applicability across expansion directions. The findings are as follows: (1) Both models show strong overall fitting abilities. However, the Gaussian model offers a more detailed understanding of urban expansion due to its multi-dimensional parameter settings. (2) In determining urban boundaries and zoning, the Gaussian model is more convenient, reflecting wave-like diffusion patterns that better match actual urban growth trends. (3) In terms of expansion direction, the urban compactness index reveals spatial heterogeneity. The inverse S function performs well, showing a clear compactness trend, while the Gaussian function's fitting degree is weaker, with less distinct compactness patterns. Overall, these two models complement each other in analyzing urban land density, unveiling the form and mechanisms of urban expansion, and providing valuable insights for sustainable urban development.
城市土地密度分析是城市扩张研究的核心。不同的数学模型在探索土地密度方面具有独特的优势和局限性,但它们之间几乎没有系统的比较。本文通过分析郑州市2000年至2020年的土地利用数据,使用高斯函数和反S函数两种模型来弥补这一差距。它量化了土地密度的变化和扩张趋势,同时还比较了模型在不同扩张方向上的适用性。研究结果如下:(1)两种模型都具有很强的整体拟合能力。然而,高斯模型由于其多维参数设置,能更详细地理解城市扩张。(2)在确定城市边界和分区时,高斯模型更方便,它反映出的波浪状扩散模式更符合实际城市增长趋势。(3)在扩张方向方面,城市紧凑度指数揭示了空间异质性。反S函数表现良好,呈现出明显的紧凑度趋势,而高斯函数的拟合度较弱,紧凑度模式不太明显。总体而言,这两种模型在分析城市土地密度、揭示城市扩张的形式和机制以及为城市可持续发展提供有价值的见解方面相互补充。