• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾脏病学提供者对推荐流感疫苗和新冠疫苗的看法:一项全国性调查。

Nephrology Provider Perceptions about Recommending Influenza and COVID-19 Vaccines: A Nationwide Survey.

作者信息

Zou Guangchen, Appel Lawrence, Crews Deidra C, Dowdy David, Matsushita Kunihiro, Riekert Kristin A, Jaar Bernard G, Ishigami Junichi

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Mercy Hospital Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA,

Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Am J Nephrol. 2025 May 23:1-13. doi: 10.1159/000544935.

DOI:10.1159/000544935
PMID:40414217
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12354274/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Vaccination rates for influenza and COVID-19 remain low among people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Nephrology care offers an opportunity to boost vaccination rates. Understanding provider perceptions can be key to developing effective intervention programs.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide survey among nephrology care providers. In a questionnaire, we assessed the providers' agreement with potential barriers to recommending influenza and COVID-19 vaccines and perceptions of selected vaccination programs on their acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility.

RESULTS

Between February and June 2023, 312 providers responded to the survey. Most providers agreed that there is sufficient evidence for influenza vaccines (270/311, 86.8%) and that vaccines reduce the risk of serious complications of influenza (277/310, 89.4%). However, 40/312 (12.8%) felt that recommending influenza vaccines is less important than other issues they must address. By profession, more physicians agreed with the evidence (112/123 or 91.1% vs. 39/49 or 79.5% for NPs and 83/101 or 82.2% for RNs, p = 0.007) than nurse practitioners (NPs) or nurses (RNs). The most perceived barrier was lack of self-efficacy: 95/311 (30.5%) felt that many patients will not get vaccinated even if they recommend it. Similar responses were seen for COVID-19 vaccines. Regarding vaccination programs, 209/235 (88.9%), 197/224 (87.9%), and 183/222 (82.4%) providers considered provider reminders acceptable, appropriate, and feasible. 209/239 (87.4%), 198/226 (87.6%), and 187/224 (83.5%) did so for standing orders. Onsite/walk-in vaccinations were viewed as acceptable by 192/242 (79.3%) but less feasible (137/222 or 61.7%). Fewer than 33% of providers perceived patient incentives as acceptable, appropriate, or feasible.

CONCLUSIONS

Most nephrology care providers believe that influenza and COVID-19 vaccinations offer evidence-based benefits, with slightly higher belief among physicians compared to NPs or RNs. However, important barriers to vaccination remain. Standing orders, provider reminders, and onsite/walk-in vaccination are favorably perceived by providers.

摘要

引言

慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者中流感疫苗和新冠疫苗的接种率仍然很低。肾脏病护理提供了提高接种率的机会。了解医护人员的看法对于制定有效的干预计划可能至关重要。

方法

我们对肾脏病护理提供者进行了一项全国性调查。在一份问卷中,我们评估了医护人员对推荐流感疫苗和新冠疫苗的潜在障碍的认同度,以及他们对选定的疫苗接种计划在可接受性、适宜性和可行性方面的看法。

结果

在2023年2月至6月期间,312名医护人员回复了调查。大多数医护人员认为有足够的证据支持流感疫苗接种(270/311,86.8%),并且疫苗可降低流感严重并发症的风险(277/310,89.4%)。然而,40/312(12.8%)的医护人员认为推荐流感疫苗不如他们必须处理的其他问题重要。按职业划分,与执业护士(NP)或护士(RN)相比,更多医生认同这些证据(112/123或91.1%,而NP为39/49或79.5%,RN为83/101或8

相似文献

1
Nephrology Provider Perceptions about Recommending Influenza and COVID-19 Vaccines: A Nationwide Survey.肾脏病学提供者对推荐流感疫苗和新冠疫苗的看法:一项全国性调查。
Am J Nephrol. 2025 May 23:1-13. doi: 10.1159/000544935.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
5
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
6
Immunogenicity and seroefficacy of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.肺炎球菌结合疫苗的免疫原性和血清效力:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jul;28(34):1-109. doi: 10.3310/YWHA3079.
7
Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children.用于预防健康儿童流感的疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 1;2(2):CD004879. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004879.pub5.
8
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
9
Face-to-face interventions for informing or educating parents about early childhood vaccination.针对向父母宣传或教育幼儿疫苗接种情况的面对面干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 8;5(5):CD010038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010038.pub3.
10
Group-based interventions to reduce gambling involvement among male football fans: a synopsis of findings from a feasibility study.基于群体的干预措施以减少男性足球迷的赌博行为:一项可行性研究结果概述
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jul;13(6):1-24. doi: 10.3310/SWWP9393.

本文引用的文献

1
One year later: What role did trust in public officials and the medical profession play in decisions to get a booster and to overcome vaccine hesitancy?一年后:对政府官员和医疗行业的信任在人们决定接种加强针以及克服疫苗犹豫方面起到了什么作用?
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Jan 20;38:102626. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102626. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Vaccine knowledge, attitudes, and recommendation practices among health care providers in New York State.纽约州卫生保健提供者的疫苗知识、态度和推荐实践。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Dec 31;19(1):2173914. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2173914. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
3
Motivational interview training improves self-efficacy of GP interns in vaccination consultations: A study using the Pro-VC-Be to measure vaccine confidence determinants.动机性访谈培训提高全科住院医师在疫苗咨询中的自我效能感:一项使用 Pro-VC-Be 测量疫苗信心决定因素的研究。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Dec 31;19(1):2163809. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2163809. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
4
Financial incentives for vaccination do not have negative unintended consequences.接种疫苗的经济激励没有产生负面的意外后果。
Nature. 2023 Jan;613(7944):526-533. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05512-4. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
5
HPV Vaccination Training of Healthcare Providers and Perceived Self-Efficacy in HPV Vaccine-Hesitancy Counseling.医疗保健提供者的HPV疫苗接种培训与HPV疫苗犹豫咨询中的自我效能感认知
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Nov 26;10(12):2025. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10122025.
6
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.基于用户反馈的更新的实施研究综合框架。
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.
7
Impact of a physician recommendation on COVID-19 vaccination intent among vaccine hesitant individuals.医生推荐对疫苗犹豫者 COVID-19 疫苗接种意愿的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Jan;106:107-112. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.09.013. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
8
Characterization of US State COVID-19 Vaccine Incentive Programs.美国各州新冠疫苗激励计划的特征
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2235328. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.35328.
9
Association of Influenza Vaccination With Cardiovascular Risk: A Meta-analysis.流感疫苗接种与心血管风险的关联:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e228873. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8873.
10
Cash incentives, ethics, and COVID-19 vaccination.现金激励、伦理道德与 COVID-19 疫苗接种。
Science. 2021 Nov 12;374(6569):819-820. doi: 10.1126/science.abm6400. Epub 2021 Nov 11.