• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于调强放射治疗(IMRT)和影像引导调强质子治疗(IMPT)治疗计划的无场景鲁棒优化算法

Scenario-free robust optimization algorithm for IMRT and IMPT treatment planning.

作者信息

Cristoforetti Remo, Hardt Jennifer Josephine, Wahl Niklas

机构信息

Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center - DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.

Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology - HIRO, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2025 Jul;52(7):e17905. doi: 10.1002/mp.17905. Epub 2025 May 25.

DOI:10.1002/mp.17905
PMID:40414693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12258008/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robust treatment planning algorithms for intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) allow for uncertainty reduction in the delivered dose distributions through explicit inclusion of error scenarios. Due to the curse of dimensionality, application of such algorithms can easily become computationally prohibitive.

PURPOSE

This work proposes a scenario-free probabilistic robust optimization algorithm that overcomes both the runtime and memory limitations typical of traditional robustness algorithms.

METHODS

The scenario-free approach minimizes cost-functions evaluated on expected-dose distributions and total variance. Calculation of these quantities relies on precomputed expected-dose-influence and total-variance-influence matrices, such that no scenarios need to be stored for optimization. The algorithm is developed within matRad and tested in several optimization configurations for photon and proton irradiation plans. A traditional robust optimization algorithm and a margin-based approach are used as a reference to benchmark the performance of the scenario-free algorithm in terms of plan quality, robustness, and computational workload.

RESULTS

The implemented scenario-free approach achieves plan quality similar to traditional robust optimization algorithms, and it reduces the distribution of standard deviation within selected structures when variance reduction objectives are defined. Avoiding the storage of individual scenario information allows for the solution of treatment plan optimization problems, including an arbitrary number of error scenarios. The observed computational time required for optimization is close to a nominal, non-robust algorithm and substantially lower compared to the traditional robust approach. Estimated gains in relative runtime range from approximately - times with respect to the traditional approach.

CONCLUSION

This work introduces a novel scenario-free optimization approach relying on the precomputation of probabilistic quantities while preserving compatibility with state-of-the-art uncertainty modeling. The measured runtime and memory footprint are independent of the number of included error scenarios and similar to those of non-robust margin-based optimization algorithms, while achieving the required dose and robustness specifications under multiple different optimization conditions. These properties make the scenario-free approach suitable and beneficial for 3D and 4D robust optimization involving a high number of error scenarios and/or CT phases.

摘要

背景

用于调强质子治疗(IMPT)和调强放射治疗(IMRT)的强大治疗计划算法,通过明确纳入误差情况,可减少所交付剂量分布的不确定性。由于维度灾难,此类算法的应用很容易在计算上变得难以承受。

目的

本研究提出一种无场景概率鲁棒优化算法,该算法克服了传统鲁棒算法典型的运行时和内存限制。

方法

无场景方法使基于预期剂量分布和总方差评估的成本函数最小化。这些量的计算依赖于预先计算的预期剂量影响矩阵和总方差影响矩阵,因此无需存储场景进行优化。该算法在matRad中开发,并在光子和质子照射计划的几种优化配置中进行测试。使用传统鲁棒优化算法和基于边缘的方法作为参考,在计划质量、鲁棒性和计算工作量方面对无场景算法的性能进行基准测试。

结果

所实现的无场景方法实现了与传统鲁棒优化算法相似的计划质量,并且当定义方差减少目标时,它减少了所选结构内的标准差分布。避免存储单个场景信息允许解决治疗计划优化问题,包括任意数量的误差情况。观察到的优化所需计算时间接近标称的非鲁棒算法,与传统鲁棒方法相比大幅降低。相对于传统方法,估计相对运行时的增益范围约为 - 倍。

结论

本研究引入了一种新颖的无场景优化方法,该方法依赖于概率量的预先计算,同时保持与最新不确定性建模的兼容性。测量的运行时和内存占用与所包含误差情况的数量无关,并且与基于边缘的非鲁棒优化算法相似,同时在多种不同优化条件下实现所需的剂量和鲁棒性规范。这些特性使无场景方法适用于并有利于涉及大量误差情况和/或CT相位的3D和4D鲁棒优化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/a8e7e62255cc/MP-52-0-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/57c070cb88c4/MP-52-0-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/c1a2cdcadeb6/MP-52-0-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/9b0c219f94af/MP-52-0-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/e2e511dd21a2/MP-52-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/6ada3e339a1c/MP-52-0-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/6e1c0f9f190b/MP-52-0-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/801e064971ff/MP-52-0-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/d168c9f7dbad/MP-52-0-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/7ca98606ed48/MP-52-0-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/5948a6b1433d/MP-52-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/4acd7b84203a/MP-52-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/31038ffc89a0/MP-52-0-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/1ec9788ee569/MP-52-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/6d306ea96b82/MP-52-0-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/059832d9c42b/MP-52-0-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/a8e7e62255cc/MP-52-0-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/57c070cb88c4/MP-52-0-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/c1a2cdcadeb6/MP-52-0-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/9b0c219f94af/MP-52-0-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/e2e511dd21a2/MP-52-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/6ada3e339a1c/MP-52-0-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/6e1c0f9f190b/MP-52-0-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/801e064971ff/MP-52-0-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/d168c9f7dbad/MP-52-0-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/7ca98606ed48/MP-52-0-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/5948a6b1433d/MP-52-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/4acd7b84203a/MP-52-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/31038ffc89a0/MP-52-0-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/1ec9788ee569/MP-52-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/6d306ea96b82/MP-52-0-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/059832d9c42b/MP-52-0-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5180/12258008/a8e7e62255cc/MP-52-0-g014.jpg

相似文献

1
Scenario-free robust optimization algorithm for IMRT and IMPT treatment planning.用于调强放射治疗(IMRT)和影像引导调强质子治疗(IMPT)治疗计划的无场景鲁棒优化算法
Med Phys. 2025 Jul;52(7):e17905. doi: 10.1002/mp.17905. Epub 2025 May 25.
2
Development and experimental validation of an in-house treatment planning system with greedy energy layer optimization for fast IMPT.用于快速调强质子治疗的具有贪婪能量层优化的内部治疗计划系统的开发与实验验证。
Med Phys. 2025 Jul;52(7):e17941. doi: 10.1002/mp.17941.
3
Early generation dynamic and static proton arc treatment planning algorithms assessment in oropharyngeal cancer patients.早期一代动态和静态质子弧形治疗计划算法在口咽癌患者中的评估
Med Phys. 2025 Jul;52(7):e17916. doi: 10.1002/mp.17916.
4
Assessment of intra-fractional and inter-fractional motion in esophageal cancer treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy.调强质子治疗食管癌过程中分次内及分次间运动的评估
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):1112. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14504-2.
5
Actor critic with experience replay-based automatic treatment planning for prostate cancer intensity modulated radiotherapy.基于经验回放的演员-评论家算法用于前列腺癌调强放射治疗的自动治疗计划
Med Phys. 2025 Jul;52(7):e17915. doi: 10.1002/mp.17915. Epub 2025 May 31.
6
The Cut-Sort-Group algorithm for efficient delivery of collimated step-and-shoot proton arc therapy.用于高效递送准直步进式质子弧形治疗的切割-排序-分组算法。
Med Phys. 2025 Jul;52(7):e17889. doi: 10.1002/mp.17889. Epub 2025 May 19.
7
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
8
Evaluation of the efficacy of automated machine learning enhanced planning system and a comparative analysis with manual planning system.自动化机器学习增强型计划系统的疗效评估及与手动计划系统的对比分析。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2025 Apr 1;21(3):593-601. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1373_24. Epub 2025 Jul 5.
9
Efficient operator-splitting minimax algorithm for robust optimization.用于鲁棒优化的高效算子分裂极小极大算法。
Med Phys. 2025 Jul;52(7):e17929. doi: 10.1002/mp.17929. Epub 2025 Jun 8.
10
Point-cloud segmentation with in-silico data augmentation for prostate cancer treatment.用于前列腺癌治疗的基于计算机模拟数据增强的点云分割
Med Phys. 2025 Apr 3. doi: 10.1002/mp.17815.

本文引用的文献

1
Robustness evaluation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy treatment planning: A systematic review.笔形束扫描质子治疗计划的稳健性评估:系统评价。
Radiother Oncol. 2024 Aug;197:110365. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110365. Epub 2024 Jun 1.
2
Comparing Efficacy Between Robust and PTV Margin-based Optimizations for Interfractional Anatomical Variations in Prostate Tomotherapy.比较前列腺螺旋断层放疗中基于 PTV 边界和基于稳健性的优化方法在分次间解剖学变化中的疗效。
In Vivo. 2024 Jan-Feb;38(1):409-417. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13453.
3
Distributed and scalable optimization for robust proton treatment planning.
分布式可扩展的稳健质子治疗计划优化。
Med Phys. 2023 Jan;50(1):633-642. doi: 10.1002/mp.15897. Epub 2022 Sep 4.
4
Evaluation of plan robustness on the dosimetry of volumetric arc radiotherapy (VMAT) with set-up uncertainty in Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) radiotherapy.评估摆位不确定性对鼻咽癌容积弧形调强放疗(VMAT)剂量学的计划稳健性。
Radiat Oncol. 2022 Jan 3;17(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01970-8.
5
Robust treatment planning with 4D intensity modulated carbon ion therapy for multiple targets in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.采用 4D 强度调制碳离子治疗技术对 IV 期非小细胞肺癌多个靶区进行稳健的治疗计划。
Phys Med Biol. 2020 Nov 6;65(21):215012. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aba1a3.
6
Automated proton treatment planning with robust optimization using constrained hierarchical optimization.使用约束分层优化进行稳健优化的自动质子治疗计划
Med Phys. 2020 Jul;47(7):2779-2790. doi: 10.1002/mp.14148. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
7
Practical robustness evaluation in radiotherapy - A photon and proton-proof alternative to PTV-based plan evaluation.放疗中的实际稳健性评估 - 一种基于 PTV 的计划评估的光子和质子证明替代方法。
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Dec;141:267-274. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
8
Potential for Improvements in Robustness and Optimality of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer with 4-Dimensional Robust Optimization.基于四维稳健优化的肺癌调强质子治疗在稳健性和最优性方面的改善潜力。
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Jan 1;11(1):35. doi: 10.3390/cancers11010035.
9
Robust radiotherapy planning.稳健的放射治疗计划。
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Nov 12;63(22):22TR02. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aae659.
10
Analytical incorporation of fractionation effects in probabilistic treatment planning for intensity-modulated proton therapy.分析强度调制质子治疗计划中分割效应的综合影响。
Med Phys. 2018 Apr;45(4):1317-1328. doi: 10.1002/mp.12775. Epub 2018 Feb 27.