• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冰岛纯素食和杂食饮食与营养摄入及温室气体排放的关系

Vegan and omnivore diets in relation to nutrient intake and greenhouse gas emissions in Iceland.

作者信息

Gudmannsdottir Ragnhildur, Gunnarsdottir Steina, Kenderesi Emese, Thorgeirsdottir Holmfridur, Torfadottir Johanna Eyrun, Gunnarsdottir Ingibjorg, Thorsdottir Inga, Wood Amanda, Geirsdottir Olof Gudny, Birgisdottir Bryndis Eva, Halldorsson Thorhallur Ingi

机构信息

Faculty of Food Science and Nutrition, School of Health Science, University of Iceland, Saemundargata 12, Reykjavik, 102, Iceland.

Unit for Nutrition Research, University of Iceland, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 May 25;15(1):18190. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03193-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-03193-3
PMID:40414965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12104359/
Abstract

Plant-rich diets have gained recognition for their environmental sustainability. However, relatively few studies have compared dietary habits of vegans and omnivores in terms of compliance with nutritional recommendations and dietary greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, which this study aimed to assess. We used data on 651 omnivores and 68 vegans from the Icelandic National Dietary Survey (2019-2021) and a comparable survey on vegans (2022-2023), respectively. The median dietary GHG emissions was substantially lower among vegans than omnivores (2.6 vs. 5.3 kg CO-eq/day). Compared to omnivores, vegans had a proportionally higher intake of energy from carbohydrates (48% vs. 39%) but a lower intake from fat (35% vs. 40%) and proteins (12% vs. 18%). More vegans compared to omnivores fell within the dietary recommendations for fiber (74% vs. 8%) and saturated fat (56% vs. 7%) while vegans were less likely to have protein intake in line with the recommended ≥ 0.83 g/kg body weight (52% vs. 79%). Despite frequent use of dietary food supplements among vegans (97%) and omnivores (72%) the prevalence of those reaching the recommended intake of iodine, calcium and vitamin D, was low (40-60%) in both groups. In conclusion, vegans were overall more compliant with macronutrient recommendations and had substantially lower dietary GHG emissions compared to omnivores. In terms of meeting dietary recommendations, room for improvements was observed in both groups.

摘要

富含植物的饮食因其环境可持续性而得到认可。然而,相对较少的研究从符合营养建议和饮食温室气体(GHG)排放方面比较纯素食者和杂食者的饮食习惯,本研究旨在对此进行评估。我们分别使用了冰岛国家饮食调查(2019 - 2021年)中651名杂食者和68名纯素食者的数据,以及一项针对纯素食者的可比调查(2022 - 2023年)的数据。纯素食者的饮食温室气体排放中位数显著低于杂食者(2.6 vs. 5.3千克二氧化碳当量/天)。与杂食者相比,纯素食者碳水化合物的能量摄入量比例更高(48% vs. 39%),但脂肪(35% vs. 40%)和蛋白质(12% vs. 18%)的摄入量更低。与杂食者相比,更多纯素食者的膳食纤维(74% vs. 8%)和饱和脂肪(56% vs. 7%)摄入量符合饮食建议,而纯素食者蛋白质摄入量符合建议的≥0.83克/千克体重的可能性较小(52% vs. 79%)。尽管纯素食者(97%)和杂食者(72%)都经常使用膳食补充剂,但两组中达到碘、钙和维生素D推荐摄入量的比例都很低(40 - 60%)。总之,与杂食者相比,纯素食者总体上更符合宏量营养素建议,且饮食温室气体排放显著更低。在满足饮食建议方面,两组都有改进空间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/953b/12104359/ae77b84d3cdb/41598_2025_3193_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/953b/12104359/4e3a62fafbd5/41598_2025_3193_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/953b/12104359/ae77b84d3cdb/41598_2025_3193_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/953b/12104359/4e3a62fafbd5/41598_2025_3193_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/953b/12104359/ae77b84d3cdb/41598_2025_3193_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Vegan and omnivore diets in relation to nutrient intake and greenhouse gas emissions in Iceland.冰岛纯素食和杂食饮食与营养摄入及温室气体排放的关系
Sci Rep. 2025 May 25;15(1):18190. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03193-3.
2
A cross-sectional study of nutritional status in healthy, young, physically-active German omnivores, vegetarians and vegans reveals adequate vitamin B status in supplemented vegans.一项针对健康、年轻、活跃的德国杂食者、素食者和严格素食者营养状况的横断面研究表明,补充剂素食者的维生素 B 状况充足。
Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2269969. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2269969. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
3
Nutrient Intake and Status of German Children and Adolescents Consuming Vegetarian, Vegan or Omnivore Diets: Results of the VeChi Youth Study.德国儿童和青少年的营养摄入和状况:素食、纯素或杂食饮食的研究结果。
Nutrients. 2021 May 18;13(5):1707. doi: 10.3390/nu13051707.
4
Micronutrient intake and status in young vegans, lacto-ovo-vegetarians, pescatarians, flexitarians, and omnivores.微量营养素摄入和年轻人素食者、乳蛋素食者、鱼素食者、杂食者和杂食者的状况。
Eur J Nutr. 2024 Oct;63(7):2725-2741. doi: 10.1007/s00394-024-03453-4. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
5
Analyzing dietary exposure to critical nutrients on a plant-based diet using the food- and total nutrient index.使用食物和总营养素指数分析以植物性饮食为主的人群对关键营养素的膳食暴露情况。
Nutr J. 2025 Mar 12;24(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12937-025-01105-9.
6
Micronutrient status and intake in omnivores, vegetarians and vegans in Switzerland.瑞士杂食者、素食者和纯素食者的微量营养素状况与摄入量。
Eur J Nutr. 2017 Feb;56(1):283-293. doi: 10.1007/s00394-015-1079-7. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
7
Food groups, macronutrient intake and objective measures of total carotenoids and fatty acids in 16-to-24-year-olds following different plant-based diets compared to an omnivorous diet.与杂食性饮食相比,不同植物性饮食的16至24岁人群的食物类别、宏量营养素摄入量以及总类胡萝卜素和脂肪酸的客观测量指标。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 17;20(1):e0311118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311118. eCollection 2025.
8
Nutrient Intake and Nutrition Status in Vegetarians and Vegans in Comparison to Omnivores - the Nutritional Evaluation (NuEva) Study.与杂食者相比,素食者和纯素食者的营养摄入与营养状况——营养评估(NuEva)研究。
Front Nutr. 2022 May 16;9:819106. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.819106. eCollection 2022.
9
Urine Metabolite Profiles and Nutrient Intake Based on 4-Day Weighed Food Diary in Habitual Vegans, Vegetarians, and Omnivores.基于 4 天称重食物日记的习惯性素食者、素食者和杂食者的尿代谢物谱和营养素摄入量。
J Nutr. 2021 Jan 4;151(1):30-39. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxaa019.
10
Intake of Dietary Salicylates from Herbs and Spices among Adult Polish Omnivores and Vegans.成人波兰杂食者和素食者摄入草药和香料中的水杨酸盐。
Nutrients. 2020 Sep 6;12(9):2727. doi: 10.3390/nu12092727.

本文引用的文献

1
Integrating environmental sustainability into food-based dietary guidelines in the Nordic countries.将环境可持续性纳入北欧国家基于食物的膳食指南。
Food Nutr Res. 2024 Oct 25;68. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v68.10792. eCollection 2024.
2
Ultra-processed food exposure and adverse health outcomes: umbrella review of epidemiological meta-analyses.超加工食品暴露与健康不良结局:流行病学荟萃分析的伞式综述。
BMJ. 2024 Feb 28;384:e077310. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077310.
3
Adherence to different forms of plant-based diets and pregnancy outcomes in the Danish National Birth Cohort: A prospective observational study.
丹麦国家出生队列研究:不同形式的植物性饮食与妊娠结局的关系:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Jun;103(6):1046-1053. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14778. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
4
A comparison of the bioaccessible calcium supplies of various plant-based products relative to bovine milk.比较各种植物性产品相对于牛奶的生物可利用钙供应。
Food Res Int. 2024 Jan;175:113795. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113795. Epub 2023 Dec 3.
5
Evidence of a vegan diet for health benefits and risks - an umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational and clinical studies.素食饮食对健康的益处和风险的证据——对观察性和临床研究荟萃分析的伞式综述。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2023;63(29):9926-9936. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2075311. Epub 2022 May 16.
6
Iodine and plant-based diets: a narrative review and calculation of iodine content.碘与植物性饮食:叙述性综述及碘含量计算。
Br J Nutr. 2024 Jan 28;131(2):265-275. doi: 10.1017/S0007114523001873. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
7
Vegans, vegetarians, fish-eaters and meat-eaters in the UK show discrepant environmental impacts.英国的纯素食者、素食者、食鱼者和肉食者表现出不同的环境影响。
Nat Food. 2023 Jul;4(7):565-574. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00795-w. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
8
Popular diets as selected by adults in the United States show wide variation in carbon footprints and diet quality.美国成年人选择的流行饮食在碳足迹和饮食质量方面存在广泛差异。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2023 Apr;117(4):701-708. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.01.009. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
9
Reliability and validity of assigning ultraprocessed food categories to 24-h dietary recall data.超加工食品类别分配给 24 小时膳食回忆数据的可靠性和有效性。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2023 Jan;117(1):182-190. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2022.10.016. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
10
The ultra-processed foods hypothesis: a product processed well beyond the basic ingredients in the package.超加工食品假说:一种经过远超包装内基本成分加工的产品。
Nutr Res Rev. 2023 Dec;36(2):340-350. doi: 10.1017/S0954422422000117. Epub 2022 Jun 22.