Verbeken Gilbert, Convents Lieke, Delmotte Nicolas, Draye Jean-Pierre, Jennes Serge, Vanderkelen Alain, Nijs Griet, Lewalle Philippe, Baudoux Etienne, Cornu Olivier, Vanlaere Ineke, Pierlot Anne, Rose Thomas, Pirnay Jean-Paul
Laboratory for Molecular and Cellular Technology, Queen Astrid Military Hospital, Brussel, Belgium.
Burn Wound Centre, Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Gilly, Belgium.
Wound Repair Regen. 2025 May-Jun;33(3):e70039. doi: 10.1111/wrr.70039.
The late 1980s saw the emergence of experimental therapies based on human cell and tissue products (HCTPs) within academic and hospital settings, several of them wound healing related. In 2008, the European Commission introduced the Regulation on advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs), defining many of these HCTPs as ATMPs, and more specifically as somatic cell therapy medicinal products (sCTMPs) or tissue-engineered products (TEPs). In 2013, we predicted that the ATMP regulation would adversely impact Member States' health care systems and would threaten the sustainability of many HCTPs provided by public health institutions. To assess the current ATMP state of play and investigate whether these predictions ultimately came true, we consulted relevant scientific and trade literature and official competent authority reports and surveyed the former Belgian HCTP producers. We found that the ATMP Regulation produced 19 authorised ATMPs, with 16 of them (84.2%) belonging to the gene therapy medicinal product (GTMP) class and only 3 HCTPs (15.8%), 2 TEPs and 1 sCTMP. List prices varied according to the ATMP class, with public health insurances struggling to reimburse ATMPs, especially the exuberantly priced GTMPs. This led to marketing authorization withdrawals, and crowd funding approaches and lotteries to determine who would receive lifesaving treatments. A hospital exemption (HE) scheme was enacted to protect ATMPs not intended for commercial exploitation. Whilst limited financial resources generally hampered HE utilisation by public actors, stringent regulatory policies made it virtually impossible in Belgium, resulting in meaningful HCTPs no longer being available to surgeons and their patients.
20世纪80年代末,基于人类细胞和组织产品(HCTP)的实验性疗法在学术和医院环境中出现,其中一些与伤口愈合有关。2008年,欧盟委员会出台了先进治疗药品(ATMP)法规,将许多此类HCTP定义为ATMP,更具体地说是体细胞治疗药品(sCTMP)或组织工程产品(TEP)。2013年,我们预测ATMP法规将对成员国的医疗保健系统产生不利影响,并威胁到公共卫生机构提供的许多HCTP的可持续性。为了评估当前ATMP的发展状况,并调查这些预测是否最终成真,我们查阅了相关的科学和贸易文献以及官方主管当局的报告,并对前比利时HCTP生产商进行了调查。我们发现,ATMP法规产生了19种获批的ATMP,其中16种(84.2%)属于基因治疗药品(GTMP)类别,只有3种HCTP(15.8%)、2种TEP和1种sCTMP。标价因ATMP类别而异,公共医疗保险难以报销ATMP,尤其是价格高昂的GTMP。这导致了上市许可的撤回,以及通过众筹和抽签来决定谁将接受救命治疗。为了保护非用于商业开发的ATMP,制定了医院豁免(HE)计划。虽然有限的财政资源通常阻碍了公共行为体对HE的利用,但严格的监管政策使得在比利时几乎不可能实施,导致外科医生及其患者无法再获得有意义的HCTP。