Qin Lina, Yu Yunfeng, Yu Rong
The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.
First Clinical College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.
Front Nutr. 2025 May 9;12:1482719. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1482719. eCollection 2025.
The influence of artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs) on metabolic risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) remains unclear. This study aimed to systematically review the literature concerning whether the effects of ASBs on body weight and metabolic risk factors are equivalent to those of unsweetened beverages (USBs).
We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from their establishment until March 3, 2025. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ASBs and USBs were included. Literature screening, data extraction, and bias evaluations were performed. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 15.0 software.
Nine RCTs involving 1,457 individuals were included. Meta-analysis findings indicated no statistically significant differences between ASB and USB groups in terms of weight, waist circumference, fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance, total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure (all > 0.05).
The study findings do not support the hypothesis that ASBs pose significant risks or benefits in terms of metabolic risk factors for NCDs. However, given this study applied a heterogeneous ASB formula, it could not adequately consider the role of specific artificial sweeteners. Further research is needed to evaluate the potential effect of different artificial sweeteners and their doses on health.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk, identifier CRD420251027794.
人工甜味饮料(ASB)对非传染性疾病(NCD)代谢危险因素的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在系统回顾关于ASB对体重和代谢危险因素的影响是否等同于无糖饮料(USB)的文献。
我们检索了PubMed、Embase、科学网和Cochrane图书馆数据库,检索时间从各数据库建立至2025年3月3日。仅纳入比较ASB和USB的随机对照试验(RCT)。进行文献筛选、数据提取和偏倚评估。使用Review Manager 5.4和Stata 15.0软件进行统计分析。
纳入9项涉及1457名个体的RCT。荟萃分析结果表明,ASB组和USB组在体重、腰围 fasting blood glucose、糖化血红蛋白、胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估、总胆固醇、甘油三酯、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、收缩压和舒张压方面均无统计学显著差异(均P>0.05)。
研究结果不支持ASB在NCD代谢危险因素方面存在重大风险或益处的假设。然而,鉴于本研究采用了异质的ASB配方,未能充分考虑特定人工甜味剂的作用。需要进一步研究以评估不同人工甜味剂及其剂量对健康的潜在影响。